<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533</id><updated>2012-02-15T23:51:00.116-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Political Snitch</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>7616</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-8510753777103931865</id><published>2012-01-25T04:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T04:30:05.248-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama outlines 'mission' of rebuilding American dream, as hurdles await his election-year agenda</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="http://a57.foxnews.com/video.foxnews.com/thumbnails/012412/640/360/640/360/012412_sotu_1_640.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;President Obama heads out on the road Wednesday to visit battlegrounds states where he will try to sell his agenda, and his reelection bid, outlined in a lengthy address to Congress and the nation on Tuesday night.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In his annual State of the Union address, President Obama suggested Americans try to follow the lead of U.S. military forces. He said Americans must get past personal ambition and partisan obsession to "focus on the mission at hand": keeping alive the American dream by restoring the U.S. economy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Â The president said that the "defining issue of our time" is finding the means to uphold the promise that if people work hard, they will succeed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"No challenge is more urgent. No debate is more important. We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share and everyone plays by the same set of rules," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the devil is in the details, and Republicans are unlikely to agree to many of the proposals the president laid out. Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who delivered the GOP response, said that the president's rigid adherence to ideology was suffocating innovation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The extremism that stifles the development of homegrown energy, or cancels a perfectly safe pipeline that would employ tens of thousands, or jacks up consumer utility bills for no improvement in either human health or world temperature, is a pro-poverty policy," Daniels said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"We do not accept that ours will ever be a nation of haves and have nots; we must always be a nation of haves and soon to haves," Daniels said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a speech heavy in focus on manufacturing, job training and tax reform, Obama said Tuesday that the most immediate priority for a divided Congress is to stop a tax hike on 160 million working Americans and prolong a payroll tax cut set to expire next month.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;At the same time, Obama proposed raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans. He said anyone who makes more than $1 million a year should not pay less than 30 percent in federal taxes and should get no special subsidies or deductions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans? Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else? ... Because if we're serious about paying down our debt, we can't do both," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Saying that the country can get its mojo back, the president said the "house of cards" collapsed in 2008 as a result of mortgages being sold to people "who couldn't afford or understand them," banks that bet using other people's money and profited either way and regulators who looked the other way or didn't have the authority to stop the bad behavior.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Since then, he said, American manufacturers are hiring again and new rules have been put in place to hold Wall Street accountable.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The state of our union is getting stronger, and we've come too far to turn back now" Obama said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;While the president wants to look at the "sunny side," Daniels said the president was elected to fix problems he did not cause, but "he cannot claim that the last three years have made things anything but worse."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"When President Obama claims that the state of our union is anything but grave, he must know in his heart that this is not true," Daniels said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Daniels also focused heavily on the entitlement system that is paying out far beyond what it can afford.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It's absolutely so that everyone should contribute to our national recovery, including of course the most affluent among us. There are smart ways and dumb ways to do this: the dumb way is to raise rates in a broken, grossly complex tax system, choking off growth without bringing in the revenues we need to meet our debts. The better course is to stop sending the wealthy benefits they do not need, and stop providing them so many tax preferences that distort our economy and do little or nothing to foster growth," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president said a new American economy must be "built to last" through government and financial systems that play by the rules and give everyone a fair shot. Borrowing the slogan from General Motors, the president called for restoring the economy and ending favoritism.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"What's at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values. We have to reclaim them," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Offering an array of suggestions for getting businesses to start hiring in the U.S. again, the president suggested incentivizing in-sourcing by doubling tax deductions for high-tech manufacturers that make products in the U.S., and extra help with financing for relocating in hard-hit communities.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Ask yourselves what you can do to bring back jobs to your country and your country will do everything it can to help you succeed," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president added that companies that outsource jobs should not get a tax break while every "multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax."Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president challenged lawmakers to pass several proposals that are unlikely to get any pick-up this election year. Obama called for Congress to pass comprehensive immigration laws, make college education cheaper and "double down" on clean energy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Recognizing that differences in Congress are too deep to pass climate change legislation, Obama said he is directing the development of clean energy on public land and announced that the Navy will purchase enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes each year..&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He called on Congress to fund "great projects" using half the money "we're no longer spending at war" and use the other half to pay down the debt.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Though he requested Congress grant him authority to take several action, the president, who rehearsed his presentation with a weekend video to supporters that was prepared by his re-election team, acknowledged that the cynicism for action is great. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He said while he's willing to cooperate with Congress, he will notÂ let Republicans hold up his plans.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"I intend to fight obstruction with action," he said.Â "With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow. But I can do a whole lot more with your help."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will follow up Tuesday night's address with a three-day tour of five states key to his re-election bid. On Wednesday he'll visit Iowa and Arizona to promote ideas to boost American manufacturing; on Thursday in Nevada and Colorado he'll discuss energy, and in Michigan on Friday he'll talk about college affordability, education and training.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a flag-waving defense of American power and influence abroad, Obama said the U.S. will safeguard its own security "against those who threaten our citizens, our friends and our interests." On Iran, he said that while all options are on the table to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon -- an implied threat to use military force -- "a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Adding that the flag that the Navy SEALs team took with it on the mission to get bin Laden is his proudest possession, the president said inevitably it falls on everyone to help lift the country.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"This nation is great because we get each other's backs," he said.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="sect"&gt;       &lt;dl id="related-media" class="related-mod"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;span&gt;Related&lt;/span&gt; Stories&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/24/fact-check-obamas-2012-state-union/?intcmp=related"&gt;FACT CHECK: Obama's 2012 State of the Union&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dd&gt; &lt;dd&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/24/transcript-obamas-2012-state-union/?intcmp=related"&gt;TRANSCRIPT: Obama's 2012 State of the Union&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dd&gt; &lt;dd&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/24/obama-proposes-broad-refinancing-for-homeowners/?intcmp=related"&gt;Obama proposes broad refinancing for homeowners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dd&gt; &lt;dd&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/24/giffords-at-state-union-greeted-by-emotional-welcomes-presidential-hug/?intcmp=related"&gt;Giffords at State of Union greeted by emotional welcomes, presidential hug&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dd&gt; &lt;dd&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/24/transcript-gop-rebuttal-to-state-union/?intcmp=related"&gt;TRANSCRIPT: GOP Rebuttal to State of the Union&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-8510753777103931865?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/8510753777103931865/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-outlines-mission-of-rebuilding.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/8510753777103931865'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/8510753777103931865'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-outlines-mission-of-rebuilding.html' title='Obama outlines &apos;mission&apos; of rebuilding American dream, as hurdles await his election-year agenda'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-2168519252320442654</id><published>2012-01-25T04:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T04:00:08.280-08:00</updated><title type='text'>State of the Union, SOTU on OTUS, Class Confrontation, Mitt's Millions, Warren Buffett's Secretary, Planet Obama (PM Note)</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;ABC Newsâ Z. Byron Wolf (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/zbyronwolf"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;@zbyronwolf&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;) reports:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tonight: State of the Union&lt;/strong&gt; â" Thatâs SOTU in DC Speak. Keep up with it on OTUS News &lt;a href="http://http/bit.ly/sj5NiO"&gt;http://http://bit.ly/sj5NiO&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Weâll be on a new frontier of user engagement with Snappy TV. Make your own clips of the speech. See ours in real time.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Also at OTUSnews.com&lt;/strong&gt; â" Live analysis from Nightline Anchor Terry Moran, ABC Political Director Amy Walter and Yahoo DC Bureau Chief David Chalian.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Secretaries at SOTU&lt;/strong&gt; â" Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Warren Buffettâs Secretary: &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/xDrvq3"&gt;http://abcn.ws/xDrvq3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Confrontation on Tax Fairness:&lt;/strong&gt; Obama to Congress â" from Devin Dwyer â" Obama will use his third State of the Union Address to promote what aides describe as a populist economic agenda that heâs already spent weeks pitching directly to voters, insisting the ideas deserve bipartisan support. Now, in the face of what heâs framed as Republican obstruction, Obama will draw an election-year line in the sand. This is a âmake-or-break moment for the middle class and folks trying to work their way into the middle class,â Obama said, previewing the address in a video posted on his re-election campaign website and emailed to supporters. âBecause we can go in two directions: One is towards less opportunity and less fairness, or we can fight for where I think we need to go: building an economy that works for everyone, not just a wealthy few.â &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/AaESWQ"&gt;http://abcn.ws/AaESWQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Theme: America Built to Last â" Sounds like a car commercial.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;First Ladyâs Box&lt;/strong&gt; â" An Astronaut, a science teacher -Â  Michelle Obama will watch her husbandâs State of the Union address surrounded by some familiar (and not-so-familiar) names â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/xVEHMY"&gt;http://abcn.ws/xVEHMY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Hottest Seat in Town&lt;/strong&gt; â" Jon Karl on how lawmakers get an aisle seat â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/zAUNFh"&gt;http://abcn.ws/zAUNFh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Different World&lt;/strong&gt; â" Boehner calls politics of the Obama administration âalmost un-American,â says he and the president hail from different metaphorical planets and speak a different language.Â  More from Jonathan Karl â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/whYhH5"&gt;http://abcn.ws/whYhH5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Planet Obama&lt;/strong&gt; â" Newt Gingrich draws largest crowd of his campaign and mocks âPlanet Obamaâ â" From Falcone/Saenz â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/w6xNt5"&gt;http://abcn.ws/w6xNt5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Sensing an Obama as alien theme from the current and former speakerâ¦&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RSVPeeved&lt;/strong&gt; â" Who is snubbing President Obama? From defensive linemen to supreme court justices, our report from Amy Bingham. â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/xW888E"&gt;http://abcn.ws/xW888E&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OTUS Political Stock Market&lt;/strong&gt; â" Newt Gingrich is within about 4 of Mitt Romney at our OTUS political stock market. Thatâs a new high for Gingrich. But both men are well behind Obama. &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/sj5NiO"&gt;http://bit.ly/sj5NiO&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mittâs Millions&lt;/strong&gt; -$42 million â10, â11 Income, 13.9 percent tax rate â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/wJKrIu"&gt;http://abcn.ws/wJKrIu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tax Rates Thru Time&lt;/strong&gt;: What Mitt Romney would have paid under past Presidents â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/zsxEOW"&gt;http://abcn.ws/zsxEOW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;â¦the .006 Percentâ¦ &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/yTVPvX"&gt;http://abcn.ws/yTVPvX&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What $21 Million Buys&lt;/strong&gt; â" What could Romneyâs $21.7 million yearly income buy? &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/zjZ9ig"&gt;http://abcn.ws/zjZ9ig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Newt Gingrich: The Lobbyist Who Wasnât There&lt;/strong&gt; â" Matt Negrinâs report on what we know about Newtâs involvement with Freddie Macâ¦ The technicalities are a bit arcane and muddied. Gingrich never officially registered himself as a lobbyist, but he did meet with elected officials to talk about legislation related to Freddie Mac. According to the federal governmentâs lobbying rules, people who spend at least 20 percent of their time lobbying are officially lobbyists. But itâs virtually impossible to measure or enforce that. âItâs totally fudge-able and totally nebulous,â said Meredith McGehee, the policy director at the Campaign Legal Center, which advocates for ethics changes. &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/ylNccg"&gt;http://abcn.ws/ylNccg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Romney Defines âInfluence Peddlingâ&lt;/strong&gt; â" Per Emily Friedman, hereâs what he said at a foreclosed-upon house in Lehigh Acres, Florida: One thing I know he was doing is that he was standing up as the former speaker of the house and someone who many people respected as a conservative leader, he was standing up and defending Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and so conservatives in congress and conservatives around the country instead of arguing to get rid of these entities to scale them back and let the free market work they said well if Newt Gingrich thinks itâs a good idea why we oughtta go along with it. Thatâs whatâs known as influence peddling. You get paid and then you go out and say things that influence other people&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;June Nominee? â"&lt;/strong&gt; Jake Tapper explains why the GOP race could last until June, and why Democrats would be thrilledÂ  â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/AqZK75"&gt;http://abcn.ws/AqZK75&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Power Players â"&lt;/strong&gt; Jake Tapper Behind the Scenes on Obamaâs Disney Trip â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/ydgi09"&gt;http://abcn.ws/ydgi09&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Newt Gingrich uses anti-Charlie Crist rhetoric to bash Mitt Romney in Florida â" Arlette Saenz â" Â &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/zLLfCC"&gt;http://abcn.ws/zLLfCC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mitt Romney on Tuesday charged that Obamaâs State of the Union would be nothing more than re-election rhetoric from a âdesperate chief.â More from Emily Friedman â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/xQei4l"&gt;http://abcn.ws/xQei4l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ABCâs Matthew Dowd on the mood of the country â" A Yearning for the Past?&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/zLIkEA"&gt;http://abcn.ws/zLIkEA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The State of the Union Isâ¦?&lt;/strong&gt; Â Republicans speculate on the contents of President Obamaâs address, as well as offer their own opinions on state of the union. &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/yxawPr"&gt;http://abcn.ws/yxawPr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Senate GOP Hammers Obamaâs State of Union, Pre-Delivery â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/A9CeP1"&gt;http://abcn.ws/A9CeP1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Santorum says Obamaâs speech will just be âflowery rhetoricâ â" &lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/ABs3QG"&gt;http://abcn.ws/ABs3QG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;ABCâs Alexa Keyes contributed to this report.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-2168519252320442654?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/2168519252320442654/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/state-of-union-sotu-on-otus-class.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/2168519252320442654'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/2168519252320442654'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/state-of-union-sotu-on-otus-class.html' title='State of the Union, SOTU on OTUS, Class Confrontation, Mitt&apos;s Millions, Warren Buffett&apos;s Secretary, Planet Obama (PM Note)'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-4229027353790909186</id><published>2012-01-25T03:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T03:30:03.605-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Santorum: 'I Wish I'd Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year'</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="innerbody"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jan 24, 2012 7:29pm&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" title="Santorum: &amp;#x2018;I Wish I&amp;#x2019;d Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year&amp;#x2019;" description="PUNTA GORDA, FLA. &amp;#x2014; GOP contender Rick Santorum does not begrudge Mitt Romney&amp;#x2019;s recently revealed wealth, telling a Tea Party crowd here that he wishes he had also made a &amp;#x201C;gazillion dollars.&amp;#x201D; &amp;#x201C;People ask me, &amp;#x2018;What do you think about Mitt Romney, you know, making..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" title="Santorum: &amp;#x2018;I Wish I&amp;#x2019;d Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year&amp;#x2019;" description="PUNTA GORDA, FLA. &amp;#x2014; GOP contender Rick Santorum does not begrudge Mitt Romney&amp;#x2019;s recently revealed wealth, telling a Tea Party crowd here that he wishes he had also made a &amp;#x201C;gazillion dollars.&amp;#x201D; &amp;#x201C;People ask me, &amp;#x2018;What do you think about Mitt Romney, you know, making..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" title="Santorum: &amp;#x2018;I Wish I&amp;#x2019;d Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year&amp;#x2019;" description="PUNTA GORDA, FLA. &amp;#x2014; GOP contender Rick Santorum does not begrudge Mitt Romney&amp;#x2019;s recently revealed wealth, telling a Tea Party crowd here that he wishes he had also made a &amp;#x201C;gazillion dollars.&amp;#x201D; &amp;#x201C;People ask me, &amp;#x2018;What do you think about Mitt Romney, you know, making..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="font-toggle"&gt; &lt;p&gt;PUNTA GORDA, FLA. â" GOP contender Rick Santorum does not begrudge Mitt Romneyâs recently revealed wealth, telling a Tea Party crowd here that he wishes he had also made a âgazillion dollars.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âPeople ask me, âWhat do you think about Mitt Romney, you know, making a gazillion dollars last year?â Good for him, thatâs what I say, good Â for him. I wish Iâd made some gazillion dollars last year. Iâd be in a little better shape financing my own campaign,â he said just hours after Romney released his much anticipated 2010 and 2011 tax returns.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney, who has faced pressure for weeks to release his returns, revealed he had made $42.5 million in the past two years. But he paid only 13.9 percent in taxes on the 2010 income, and the rate for his 2011 income is a projected 15.3%.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Addressing a crowd of about 300 people under a balmy Florida sun, Â Santorum did not wear his signature sweater vest and tried to get away from the persona that he is a buttoned-up Mr. Nice Guy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Instead, Santorum insisted he could be âmeanâ and had earned a reputation as a âbomb throwerâ during his two terms in the Senate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âThank you for thinking Iâm such a nice guy,â Santorum told a woman who asked if he was tough enough to âkick some buttâ in Washington. Â âThe attitude, itâs so funny because when I was in Congress I was Â known as a bomb thrower. I was known as the guy that would come in and blow things up.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Asked to comment on Sen. Rand Paulâs reported detention by the TSA before catching a flight to Washington, Santorum admitted he joked with Paulâs father-candidate, Ron Paul, at Monday nightâs GOP debate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Santorum said that rather than shaking Ron Paulâs hand before the debate started, he instead played a joke, pretending to frisk him Â instead.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âYou know, I said hello to Romney, and I said hello to Newt, and then I Â saw Ron Paul and I went over and I frisked him. And said I want to make sure Iâm safe with you here, Ron, todayâ¦. We both had a big laugh at that,â he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" title="Santorum: &amp;#x2018;I Wish I&amp;#x2019;d Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year&amp;#x2019;" description="PUNTA GORDA, FLA. &amp;#x2014; GOP contender Rick Santorum does not begrudge Mitt Romney&amp;#x2019;s recently revealed wealth, telling a Tea Party crowd here that he wishes he had also made a &amp;#x201C;gazillion dollars.&amp;#x201D; &amp;#x201C;People ask me, &amp;#x2018;What do you think about Mitt Romney, you know, making..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" title="Santorum: &amp;#x2018;I Wish I&amp;#x2019;d Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year&amp;#x2019;" description="PUNTA GORDA, FLA. &amp;#x2014; GOP contender Rick Santorum does not begrudge Mitt Romney&amp;#x2019;s recently revealed wealth, telling a Tea Party crowd here that he wishes he had also made a &amp;#x201C;gazillion dollars.&amp;#x201D; &amp;#x201C;People ask me, &amp;#x2018;What do you think about Mitt Romney, you know, making..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" title="Santorum: &amp;#x2018;I Wish I&amp;#x2019;d Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year&amp;#x2019;" description="PUNTA GORDA, FLA. &amp;#x2014; GOP contender Rick Santorum does not begrudge Mitt Romney&amp;#x2019;s recently revealed wealth, telling a Tea Party crowd here that he wishes he had also made a &amp;#x201C;gazillion dollars.&amp;#x201D; &amp;#x201C;People ask me, &amp;#x2018;What do you think about Mitt Romney, you know, making..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/i-wish-id-made-a-gazillion-dollars-last-year/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-4229027353790909186?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/4229027353790909186/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/santorum-i-wish-id-made-gazillion.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4229027353790909186'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4229027353790909186'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/santorum-i-wish-id-made-gazillion.html' title='Santorum: &apos;I Wish I&apos;d Made a Gazillion Dollars Last Year&apos;'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-3068984644761420468</id><published>2012-01-25T03:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T03:00:05.979-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama State of the Union Makes Case for Economic 'Fairness'</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="storyText"&gt;     &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/obama-state-union-congress-campaign-hits-capitol-hill/story?id=15424001#.Tx9M2YHNltk"&gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt; tonight presented an argument for his presidency and a second term with a State of the Union address that outlined a sweeping vision for American exceptionalism sustained by an economy rooted in "fairness."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive. No challenge is more urgent. No debate is more important," Obama said of the need to enact an agenda that bolsters the middle class.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"What's at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values," he added. "We have to reclaim them."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama's moment in the spotlight and on the national stage came at &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-split-screen-mixed-messages-from-washington-and-florida-the-note/"&gt;a crucial moment&lt;/a&gt; in his first term, with the economy showing continued signs of progress, his job approval ratings up slightly, and his Republican rivals divided over choosing their nominee.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama seized the opportunity to highlight his accomplishments over the past three years and "set the tone" for his re-election campaign, tacitly framing the November election as a choice between two starkly different political philosophies, rather than a referendum on his controversial tenure.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_image_feature"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="leftRail.showStoryPhoto('rel_image_feature');" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Image]&amp;amp;lid=view[Image]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/gty_obama_sotu_2_thg_120124_wg.jpg" width="199" height="112" class="c3" border="0" alt="PHOTO: US President Barack Obama delivers his annual State of the Union Address before a joint session of Congress and the Supreme Court, Jan. 24, 2012 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC." title=""/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="photo_caption"&gt;US President Barack Obama delivers his annual... &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="leftRail.showStoryPhoto('rel_image_feature');" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Image]&amp;amp;lid=view[Image]"&gt;View Full Size&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/gty_obama_sotu_2_thg_120124_wg.jpg" width="640" height="360" class="c1" border="0" alt="PHOTO: US President Barack Obama delivers his annual State of the Union Address before a joint session of Congress and the Supreme Court, Jan. 24, 2012 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC." title=""/&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_1"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_1','15434552',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_1]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/abc_sotu_3_jobs_120124_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;President Obama Details Job Creation Plan &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_1','15434552',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_1');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_2"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_2','15434609',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_2]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/abc_sotu_4_education_120124_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;Obama: Give Schools Flexibility in Education &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_2','15434609',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_2');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_3"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_3','15434414',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_3]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/abc_sotu_2_manufacture_120124_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;State of the Union: Obama on Manufacturing &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_3','15434414',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_3');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The president accentuated themes from a &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/obama-to-invoke-roosevelts-square-deal-in-kansas-tax-cut-pitch/"&gt;fiery populist speech&lt;/a&gt; he delivered in Kansas in December, telling his audience because of his economic and foreign policies "the state of our Union is getting stronger."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"We've come too far to turn back now," he said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;At the heart of Obama's case for the restoration of "American values" was formally imposing the so-called &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/president-obama-to-propose-millionaires-tax-called-buffett-rule/"&gt;Buffett Rule&lt;/a&gt; -- the idea that millionaires and billionaires should not pay a lower percentage rate in taxes than members of the middle class.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"You can call this class warfare all you want. But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense," he said, calling for a new legal requirement that Americans making more than $1 million a year pay a minimum effective tax rate of at least 30 percent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The secretary of billionaire investor Warren Buffett was a the guest of first lady Michelle Obama this evening so as to illustrate that point made by her boss. (&lt;a href="http://abcn.ws/xVEHMY"&gt;See the full list of guests in the first lady's box&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama also discussed proposals to boost American manufacturing, invigorate energy production and expand the skill sets of U.S. workers that included a series of new taxes and new spending measures as well as at least two new government departments.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He called for an end to tax deductions for housing, health care, retirement and child care for millionaires and the elimination of federal subsidies, such as food stamps, for the same, an idea put forth by Republican Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Adding details to &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-hails-insourcing-trend-hints-at-new-tax-breaks/"&gt;an idea he hinted at last week&lt;/a&gt;, Obama called for an end to tax incentives for companies that move work overseas or shut down their factories, while proposing new, lower overall tax rates for U.S. manufacturers, particularly those that relocate factories to economically hard-hit communities.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It's time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America," he said. "Send me these tax reforms, and I'll sign them right away."&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-3068984644761420468?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/3068984644761420468/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-state-of-union-makes-case-for.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3068984644761420468'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3068984644761420468'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-state-of-union-makes-case-for.html' title='Obama State of the Union Makes Case for Economic &apos;Fairness&apos;'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-395090866533300654</id><published>2012-01-25T02:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T02:30:04.089-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama State of the Union Address to Make Pitch for Economic Fairness</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;WASHINGTON â" &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Barack Obama." class="meta-per"&gt;President Obama&lt;/a&gt;, confronting a Congress where Republicans have been determined to stymie him, will use his third &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/state_of_the_union_message_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about the State of the Union address." class="meta-classifier"&gt;State of the Union address&lt;/a&gt; on Tuesday night to offer a populist pitch for greater economic fairness as part of his re-election campaign.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âWe can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by,â Mr. Obama says in brief excerpts of the speech released by the White House Tuesday evening. âOr we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;For weeks, Mr. Obama and his aides have been signaling that the theme of Tuesdayâs speech, scheduled to begin at 9 p.m. Eastern time, would be that the richest Americans should shoulder more of the nationâs tax burden, that the middle class should have a shot at prosperity and that the disadvantaged should be provided social scaffolding to help them climb upward.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;And while Mr. Obamaâs themes are cast in terms of seemingly universal appeal, like economic fairness, fiscal frugality, efficiency in government and national pride, on almost every point there are profound differences between the political parties that no number of applause lines can really bridge.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;And he will repeat â" this time, directly to a Congressional audience â" his frequent warnings on the campaign trail that he would use executive powers to force action where he can.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âI intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place,â he will say.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Indeed, there is little prospect that the administration will be able to break the pervasive gridlock with Congress on many of the substantive issues the speech highlights. Still, the speech, which is expected to be watched by one of the biggest audiences the president may receive before the November election, comes just as the election campaign reaches a boil, with his leading Republican opponents in a full-throated competition over how best to defeat the president.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;House Speaker John A. Boehner, who will sit behind Mr. Obama, said after a meeting of his caucus on Tuesday that he expected the presidentâs speech to be âa rerun of what we have seen before.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Some of the themes in the speech were personified in the guests invited by the White House to sit in Michelle Obamaâs box overlooking the cavernous House chamber. There will be Debbie Bosanek, the secretary to Warren E. Buffett, a poster-child for Mr. Obamaâs thesis that it is unfair to tax an ordinary worker at higher effective rates than her billionaire boss. Alongside her will be 20 extraordinary and ordinary people drawn from commerce, education, technology, politics, the military and the struggling working class.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Not to be outdone, Mr. Boehner announced that he would welcome as visitors to the Capitol tonight a group of energy business managers whose enterprises are being hurt by the Obama administrationâs refusal to approve the cross-country &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/k/keystone_pipeline/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about the Keystone XL pipeline." class="meta-classifier"&gt;Keystone XL&lt;/a&gt; pipeline.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;So it will go, blow by blow, in an event that for all its ceremonial staging is also a political prize fight.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âTonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy thatâs built to last â" an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values,â Mr. Obama will say.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âWhatâs at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values,â he plans to say, âbut American values.â But the differences between the parties are in fact as sharp as ever, especially on the subject of taxes, where his proposals â" the latest formulation of a policy that would limit tax breaks for millionaires without raising taxes on the less wealthy â" run directly counter to those of the Republicans.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;And if both sides agree, for example, that American reserves of natural gas should be exploited, there is much less agreement on how the nationâs fossil fuels should be developed and transported, or about how alternative forms of energy should be encouraged.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;If Mr. Obama chooses, as expected, to support consumer protections and enforcement actions taken under landmark &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/credit_crisis/financial_regulatory_reform/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about financial regulatory reform." class="meta-classifier"&gt;financial regulations&lt;/a&gt; passed during his first term, or to recommend new efficiencies in government, Republicans counter with calls to repeal the law â" and to abolish entire federal agencies.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The formal Republican response is to come from Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana, chosen by the Republican leaders because of his record on taxes and spending.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Not waiting for Mr. Obama to speak, they responded in some detail hours before his delivery.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mitt Romney, a leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination, said in a speech of his own on Tuesday that the presidentâs address was nothing but âpartisan plans for his re-election campaignâ and âtall tales about America.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âPresident Obama has amassed an actual record of debt, decline and disappointment,â Mr. Romney said. âInstead of solving the housing crisis and getting Americans back to work, President Obama has been building a European-style welfare state.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Boehner said, âThe presidentâs policies have made our economy worseâ and predicted that Mr. Obama would âdouble down on what hasnât worked.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Lawmakers sometimes call a truce on the occasion of the presidentâs annual address to Congress. But Republican comments on Tuesday suggested that the president would receive a cool reception from some prominent members of the party.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âThe presidentâs policies have failed,â said Representative Jeb Hensarling of Texas, the chairman of the House Republican Conference. âThatâs why heâs resorting to policies of envy and division.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;All day long, the White House signaled that the president would insist, as he has done many times before, that wealthier households should be shouldering more of the burden.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âWe are going to outline that specifically tonight,â said David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, on ABCâs âGood Morning America.â âThe point is, we need to change our tax system. We need to make sure that middle-class workers are not paying more in effective tax rates than people who are making forty, fifty, a hundred million dollars a year.â&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-395090866533300654?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/395090866533300654/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-state-of-union-address-to-make.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/395090866533300654'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/395090866533300654'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-state-of-union-address-to-make.html' title='Obama State of the Union Address to Make Pitch for Economic Fairness'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-8066014564000197006</id><published>2012-01-25T02:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T02:00:05.777-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Editorial Board: State of the Union speech is full of soaring rhetoric but skips over some major challenges</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;A&lt;span&gt;â&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/state-of-the-union"&gt;STATE OF THE UNION&lt;/a&gt; address from a president seeking reelection is always an odd event. Especially in the face of a divided Congress, the presidentâs proclaimed program stands little chance of enactment. The ambitious agenda of years past gives way to the knowledge, born of painful experience, of how difficult that will be to achieve. Meanwhile, the presidentâs proposals are made in the context of the race about to be joined, stacked up against the pie-in-the-sky promises of his opponents. The subtext is, inevitably, less a blueprint of the year to come than an explanation of why the president deserves reelection and a sneak preview of a second-term agenda.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In that context, President Obamaâs speech Tuesday night combined soaring rhetoric with crowd-pleasing, often small-bore proposals. Mr. Obama spoke movingly about the eroding economic security of much of the middle class. Building on themes he sounded a few months ago in &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-new-square-deal/2011/12/07/gIQAxL17cO_story.html"&gt;Osawatomie&lt;/a&gt;, Kan., the president argued against, as he put it, âsettl[ing] for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by.â To raise this issue is not, as former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (R) asserted even before the presidentâs speech, â&lt;a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/romney-prebuttal-to-sotu-divisive-rhetoric-from-a-desperate-obama-20120124?mrefid=election2012"&gt;divisive rhetoric&lt;/a&gt; from a desperate campaigner in chief.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="article-side-rail"&gt;    &lt;div class="article-video border-top padding-top padding-bottom margin-bottom flipboard-remove module s1 img-border"&gt; &lt;p class="heading heading2"&gt;Washington Post Editorials&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;h2 class="no-left"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/the-posts-view/2011/12/07/gIQAoEIscO_page.html"/&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Editorials represent the views of The Washington Post as an institution, as determined through debate among members of the editorial board. News reporters and editors never contribute to editorial board discussions, and editorial board members donât have any role in news coverage.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;p class="clear margin-top align-right"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/the-posts-view/2011/12/07/gIQAoEIscO_page.html" class="icon right-arrow"&gt;Read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="article-video border-top padding-top padding-bottom margin-bottom flipboard-remove"&gt; &lt;div class="module s1 img-border"&gt; &lt;p class="heading heading2"&gt;Latest Editorials&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/state-of-the-union-speech-is-full-of-rhetoric-but-skimpy-on-some-tricky-details/2012/01/24/gIQA3GlzOQ_story.html"&gt;&lt;img class="left" src="http://img2.wpdigital.net/rf/image_90x60/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/01/25/Web-Resampled/2012-01-24/_tn_1000.3.1985570094_Z54C3EcFEeGZcsX2K1rJyg_Obama_State_of_the_Union_017ce-9742--90x60.jpg" alt="Grand rhetoric, smaller ideas"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;div class="margin-left-100"&gt; &lt;p class="byline"&gt;Editorial Board &lt;span class="timestamp pre" id="ts_35643269733797514_1327469655407" epochtime="1327461710000" channel="" contenttype="article"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The State of the Union served less as a policy blueprint than a case for reelection.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="module s1 img-border"&gt;  &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dc-lottery-probe-findings-highlight-a-need-for-further-investigation/2012/01/24/gIQAN11gOQ_story.html"&gt;&lt;img class="left" src="http://img2.wpdigital.net/rf/image_90x60/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2011/10/12/Local/Images/20420750.jpg" alt="Lotto questions"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;div class="margin-left-100"&gt; &lt;p class="byline"&gt;Editorial Board &lt;span class="timestamp pre" id="ts_6481752549043987_1327469039410" epochtime="1327454665000" channel="" contenttype="article"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Inspector generalâs report calls into question how the city approved online gambling.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="module s1 img-border"&gt;  &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-prime-time-call-for-gun-control-would-honor-rep-gabrielle-giffords/2012/01/23/gIQAs7m0LQ_story.html"&gt;&lt;img class="left" src="http://img2.wpdigital.net/rf/image_90x60/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/01/23/Web-Resampled/2012-01-23/Giffords-Resign_Resign.JPEG-0e551--90x60.jpg" alt="For Rep. Giffords&amp;#x2019;s sake"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;div class="margin-left-100"&gt; &lt;p class="byline"&gt;Editorial Board &lt;span class="timestamp pre" id="ts_14000423983531651_1327469039571" epochtime="1327363094000" channel="" contenttype="article"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama needs to speak up about gun control.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;The presidentâs biggest new idea was attaching a number to his previously articulated â&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/beyond-the-buffett-rule-how-the-sage-of-omaha-can-help-obama-and-the-economy/2011/09/21/gIQAvIenrK_story.html"&gt;Buffett Rule&lt;/a&gt;â â" billionaire Warren Buffettâs position that he should not pay a smaller share of his income in taxes than his secretaryâs; she was in attendance in the first ladyâs box. Mr. Obama announced that not only billionaires but all those earning $1 million or more a year should pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes. Think of this as a new version of the alternative minimum tax.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This position sets up a politically useful contrast between Mr. Obama and Mr. Romney. It is not a fleshed-out proposal that the administration expects, for example, to produce as a line item in the forthcoming budget. Administration officials could not tell us how much revenue such a change would produce. But Mr. Obama is right to take on the unlevel and distorting playing field of a code that taxes ordinary earned income at a much higher rate than investment income.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mr. Obama has said he wants to make the tax code simpler, but his proposals would further complicate it, adding or reshuffling preferences for manufacturing. This kind of picking and choosing between manufacturing and other businesses, or between different kinds of manufacturers (the president said he wants to double the deduction for high-tech manufacturers), or between towns that have lost factories and towns that havenât, introduces needless complexity into an already unwieldy code. It also relies on a vision of manufacturing as an engine of jobs that may not be realistic in an age of increasingly automated factories.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Once again Mr. Obama slighted the threat that the federal deficit poses to the growth he said he wants. As with &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/2011-state-of-the-union/index.html"&gt;last yearâs State of the Union speech&lt;/a&gt;, when he relegated the debt to a near-aside late in the speech, Mr. Obama did not go beyond a rhetorical nod to the issue. Indeed, in arguing for increased investment in U.S. infrastructure â" a worthy idea â" Mr. Obama gave up on the traditional approach of paying with an increase in the gasoline tax or similar user fees. Instead, he relied on the dodge of âpaying forâ those costs by using some of the savings from winding down operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The administration is right to be frustrated by congressional unwillingness to consider real pay-fors, but wrong to respond with a measure that would just make the deficit worse.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mr. Obamaâs discussion of foreign policy focused on the two achievements likely to be a major focus of his election campaign, the withdrawal of the last troops from Iraq and the killing of Osama bin Laden. He vowed that America would remain (borrowing President Clintonâs phrase) the one âindispensableâ nation, even as he cuts &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/president-obamas-defense-strategy/2012/01/06/gIQAKm5pfP_story.html"&gt;a half-trillion dollars&lt;/a&gt; from the military budget. The president did not hint at any significant foreign policy initiatives for the coming year; even on Iraq, he failed to discuss future relations with that strategic oil producer, which has headed toward &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-iraq-a-return-to-old-enmities/2011/12/20/gIQAtIxz7O_story.html"&gt;renewed internal conflict&lt;/a&gt; since the last U.S. soldiers pulled out.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, delivering the Republican rebuttal, had the fiscal question right when he said: âIf we drift, quarreling and paralyzed, over a Niagara of debt, we will all suffer, regardless of income, race, gender, or other category.â But his eloquence is undercut by his partyâs refusal, far more doctrinaire than Mr. Obamaâs, to entertain responsible proposals to pay for the nationâs needs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-8066014564000197006?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/8066014564000197006/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/editorial-board-state-of-union-speech.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/8066014564000197006'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/8066014564000197006'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/editorial-board-state-of-union-speech.html' title='Editorial Board: State of the Union speech is full of soaring rhetoric but skips over some major challenges'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-8868827652529427969</id><published>2012-01-25T01:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T01:30:04.199-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama cranks up populist pitch</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="el-article-div"&gt;&lt;span id="startOfPage"/&gt; &lt;p&gt;President Obama used his election-year State of the Union address to issue a loud call for economic equality based on âresponsibility from everybody,â a theme prefacing his 2012 campaign message.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Cranking up the volume on the populist message that the wealthy should pay higher taxes, Obama said the goal of economic equality was a return to American values and âthe defining issue of our time.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the addressâ"dubbed a âBlueprint for America Built to Lastââ" a pugnacious Obama used the power of the bully pulpit before a sharply divided joint session of Congress to take the offensive and pledge that while he would work with lawmakers, he also intended to âfight obstruction with action.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Repeating that he would not âback down,â Obama said, âno challenge is more urgentâ than to support the middle class.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWe can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules,â Obama said. âWhatâs at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values but American values. We have to reclaim them.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The address has been dubbed as the presidentâs first major stump speech of the year, and Obama took an indirect swing at GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romneyâ"who released his much anticipated tax returns earlier in the day-â"by renewing his call for the so-called âBuffett Rule,â named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The rule seeks to ensure that middle-class workers do not pay a higher tax rate than their well-to-do bosses and Obamaâs proposal dictates that those making more than $1 million would pay a minimum effective rate of at least 30 percent, more than double the rate Romney expects to pay this year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;It would also eliminate tax deductions for those making more than $1 millionâ"including for housing, health care, retirement and child careâ"and would end federal subsidies such as food stamps and unemployment benefits for millionaires.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;To drive the message home, Obama invited Buffettâs secretary Debbie Bosanek to attend; she sat with first lady Michelle Obama.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âNow you can call this class warfare all you want,â a feisty Obama said. âBut asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWe donât begrudge financial success in this country,â the president continued. âWe admire it. When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, itâs not because they envy the rich. Itâs because they understand that when I get tax breaks I donât need and the country canât afford, it either adds to the deficit or somebody else has to make up the differenceâ¦Thatâs not right. Americans know itâs not right.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney, who has seen his command of the GOP race unravel due to a surge in support for Newt Gingrich, offered a retort to Obama a half-day before the president delivered his address, ripping the president as the âCampaigner-in-Chiefâ to an audience in Florida for using the State of the Union to âdivide our nation.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who delivered the formal GOP response to Obama, also criticized the president for his divisive rhetoric. He said Itâs ânot fair and itâs not trueâ for Obama to cast congressional Republicans as obstacles.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The address on Tuesday night had a much different air from the one which took place last year, in the days after the attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) when lawmakers in both parties sought to ease tensions and put aside the vitriol that became commonplace on Capitol Hill.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;While the chamber gave Giffords a rousing standing ovation upon her arrival on Tuesday night, Obama was met with a partly grim-faced crowd when he discussed his prioritiesâ"including a renewed call to prevent a tax hike on a 160 working class Ameircans-- with a partly-combative tone.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âPeople cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year,â he said. âThere are plenty of ways to get this done. So letâs agree right here, right now: No side issues. No drama. Pass the payroll tax cut without delay. Letâs get it done!â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obamaâs speech expanded on the vision he sketched out in an address last month in Kansas. He set out to provide Congress with a wish list of sorts to achieve a sound economy, and his hour-long address included four major cornerstones: manufacturing, energy, education and values.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Think about the America within our reach, a country that leads the world in educating its people. An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high paying jobs," Obama said. "A future where we're in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren't so tied to unstable parts of the world. An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama provided new details in the speech on how to invest in jobs domestically though âinsourcing.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He proposed eliminating tax deductions for companies that move U.S. jobs overseas and called for an âinternational minimum taxâ to be imposed on a companyâs overseas profits. He also proposed a tax credit for companies that move jobs back to the U.S.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president also unveiled a new mortgage crisis unit that will be directed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. The new office would be created within the Unit on Mortgage Origination and Securitization that investigates misconduct and illegal activity in the housing market. He also announced that he would be creating a Trade Enforcement Unit that will investigate âunfairâ trade practices in countries like China.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a nod to the Hispanic voters who will be a key factor in the fall campaign, Obama called for building a 21st century immigration system intended to give âresponsible young peopleâ a chance to earn their citizenship.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWe should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now,â Obama said. âBut if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, letâs at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses and defend this country.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;While the focus of the address is on the economy, Obama also touted his foreign policy accomplishments. Keeping up with his campaign pledge, Obama said he brought the troops home from Iraq. He also said he delivered justice to 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden and that the nation has made important progress in Afghanistan and joined with allies and partners to protect the Libyan regime of Moammar Gadhafi.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The presidentâ"who has chided Congress in recent months for refusing to actâ"most recently in the payroll tax debate, has demonstrated that he will go it alone, using a string of "We Can't Wait" initiatives to move ahead with his proposals. Earlier this month, he angered GOP lawmakers by recess-appointing three people to the National Labor Relations Board and Richard Cordray, who was invited to the State of the Union, to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In his address on Tuesday, Obama vowed to work with "anyone in this chamber" to build on momentum to achieve a sound economy. But at the same time, he added, "I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWith or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow,â Obama warned.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He did just that when he informed the chamber that he would be signing an executive order that would clear away that red tape that stalls construction projects.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And he did it again when he said he was directing his administration âto allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes.â Obama said the Department of Defenseâ"the worldâs largest consumer of energyâ"would make a commitment to clean energy by having the Navy purchase enough capacity to power more than 200,000 homes a year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âThe differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change,â Obama said. âBut thereâs no reason why Congress shouldnât at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation. So far you havenât acted. Well tonight, I will.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;While some are dubbing the address as the first major stump speech of the year, the White House has refuted the suggestion, calling it a policy heavy speech that largely steers clear of politics.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;On Wednesday, Obama will attempt to sell the points of his address in a three-day road trip to five battleground states in Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Michigan.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This story was posted at 9:15 p.m. and updated at 10:47 p.m.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;hr/&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-8868827652529427969?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/8868827652529427969/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-cranks-up-populist-pitch.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/8868827652529427969'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/8868827652529427969'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-cranks-up-populist-pitch.html' title='Obama cranks up populist pitch'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-3573986861837794496</id><published>2012-01-25T01:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T01:00:08.001-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Gingrich, to Huge Crowd, Mocks 'Planet Obama'</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="innerbody"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jan 24, 2012 4:36pm&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" title="Newt Gingrich Draws Largest Crowd Of His Campaign And Mocks &amp;#x2018;Planet Obama&amp;#x2019;" description="ABC News&amp;#x2019; Michael Falcone and Arlette Saenz report: SARASOTA, Fla. &amp;#x2014; It was easy to see the symbols of Newt Gingrich&amp;#x2019;s momentum in the Republican presidential race: they filled three-quarters of a 27,000 square foot airplane hanger here on balmy Tuesday afternoon. &amp;#x201C;You have to..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" title="Newt Gingrich Draws Largest Crowd Of His Campaign And Mocks &amp;#x2018;Planet Obama&amp;#x2019;" description="ABC News&amp;#x2019; Michael Falcone and Arlette Saenz report: SARASOTA, Fla. &amp;#x2014; It was easy to see the symbols of Newt Gingrich&amp;#x2019;s momentum in the Republican presidential race: they filled three-quarters of a 27,000 square foot airplane hanger here on balmy Tuesday afternoon. &amp;#x201C;You have to..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" title="Newt Gingrich Draws Largest Crowd Of His Campaign And Mocks &amp;#x2018;Planet Obama&amp;#x2019;" description="ABC News&amp;#x2019; Michael Falcone and Arlette Saenz report: SARASOTA, Fla. &amp;#x2014; It was easy to see the symbols of Newt Gingrich&amp;#x2019;s momentum in the Republican presidential race: they filled three-quarters of a 27,000 square foot airplane hanger here on balmy Tuesday afternoon. &amp;#x201C;You have to..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="font-toggle"&gt; &lt;div class="wp-caption alignnone c3"&gt;&lt;img title="Republican presidential candidate and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich speaks during a campaign event at Tick Tock Restaurant on Jan. 24, 2012 in Tampa, Fl. Newt Gingrich campaigns for votes in Florida before the Jan. 31st primary." src="http://www.abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/gty_newt_gingrich_thg_120124_main.jpg" alt="gty newt gingrich thg 120124 main Newt Gingrich Draws Largest Crowd Of His Campaign And Mocks Planet Obama" width="413" height="310"/&gt;&lt;p class="wp-caption-text"&gt;Joe Raedle/Getty Images&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;ABC Newsâ Michael Falcone and Arlette Saenz report:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;SARASOTA, Fla. â" It was easy to see the symbols of Newt Gingrichâs momentum in the Republican presidential race: they filled three-quarters of a 27,000 square foot airplane hanger here on balmy Tuesday afternoon.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âYou have to imagine looking out over this crowd and what it just does to make you feel good about Florida,â Gingrich told an estimated 2,500 people. âThis crowd says a lot about this election.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With a large American flag at his back, his campaign bus to his right, and President Obamaâs State of the Union address just hours away, Gingrich said he would be happy to âsuggest a few things that would improve the state of the union.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âYou always have to wonder after Obama speaks, which country he thinks heâs talking about,â Gingrich said, âyou always have to wonder what his source material is.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The former House Speaker who is giving rival Mitt Romney a stiff challenge in the Republican nominating contest spoke to a crowd of Floridians that far surpassed his next-largest event in Salem, N.H. earlier this month. And those who gathered at a private jet airport in Sarasota waited nearly 40 extra minutes to hear Gingrich who was running behind schedule on Tuesday. Many waved hand-held flags and chanted, âNewt! Newt! Newt!â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;What they got was the candidateâs own preview of the State of the Union address, which Gingrich said would show the president was living on âPlanet Obama.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âHe doesnât seem to operate on the same planet you and I do,â Gingrich joked.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âTonight the president will explain that was all George W. Bushâs fault,â Gingrich said predicting Obamaâs explanation for the countryâs economic slump. âThis is the fourth year of his presidency. He needs to get over it.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Gingrich spent the day making his way down the western coast of Florida â" an important region in his quest to overtake Romney. A win here would give him the unmistakable upper hand heading into the rest of the primary season. But apart from a few passing references to the former Massachusetts governor, Gingrich focused on the president.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âI am for creating jobs, he is for getting people dependent on government. I am for the Declaration of Independence, he is for Saul Alinsky. I am for strength in foreign policy, he is for weakness in foreign policy,â Gingrich said of Obama. âI think itâs that big a gap.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" title="Newt Gingrich Draws Largest Crowd Of His Campaign And Mocks &amp;#x2018;Planet Obama&amp;#x2019;" description="ABC News&amp;#x2019; Michael Falcone and Arlette Saenz report: SARASOTA, Fla. &amp;#x2014; It was easy to see the symbols of Newt Gingrich&amp;#x2019;s momentum in the Republican presidential race: they filled three-quarters of a 27,000 square foot airplane hanger here on balmy Tuesday afternoon. &amp;#x201C;You have to..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" title="Newt Gingrich Draws Largest Crowd Of His Campaign And Mocks &amp;#x2018;Planet Obama&amp;#x2019;" description="ABC News&amp;#x2019; Michael Falcone and Arlette Saenz report: SARASOTA, Fla. &amp;#x2014; It was easy to see the symbols of Newt Gingrich&amp;#x2019;s momentum in the Republican presidential race: they filled three-quarters of a 27,000 square foot airplane hanger here on balmy Tuesday afternoon. &amp;#x201C;You have to..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" title="Newt Gingrich Draws Largest Crowd Of His Campaign And Mocks &amp;#x2018;Planet Obama&amp;#x2019;" description="ABC News&amp;#x2019; Michael Falcone and Arlette Saenz report: SARASOTA, Fla. &amp;#x2014; It was easy to see the symbols of Newt Gingrich&amp;#x2019;s momentum in the Republican presidential race: they filled three-quarters of a 27,000 square foot airplane hanger here on balmy Tuesday afternoon. &amp;#x201C;You have to..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/newt-gingrich-draws-largest-crowd-of-his-campaign-and-mocks-planet-obama/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-3573986861837794496?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/3573986861837794496/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/gingrich-to-huge-crowd-mocks-planet.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3573986861837794496'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3573986861837794496'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/gingrich-to-huge-crowd-mocks-planet.html' title='Gingrich, to Huge Crowd, Mocks &apos;Planet Obama&apos;'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-6121947978474417990</id><published>2012-01-25T00:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T00:30:03.496-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama to Address 'Do-Nothing' Congress</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="storyText"&gt;     &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-sings-soul-tune-in-harlem/"&gt;President Obama&lt;/a&gt; has spent the past three months railing against a "do-nothing Congress," and tonight he has the opportunity to deliver his message face to face.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will use his third State of the Union Address to promote what aides describe as a populist economic agenda he's already spent weeks &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/obamas-new-jobs-slogan-we-cant-wait/"&gt;pitching directly to voters&lt;/a&gt;, insisting the ideas deserve bipartisan support. Now, in the face of what he's framed as &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/obama-rips-house-gop-says-faction-blocking-payroll-tax-cut/"&gt;Republican obstruction&lt;/a&gt;, Obama will draw an election-year line in the sand.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is a "make-or-break moment for the middle class and folks trying to work their way into the middle class," Obama said, &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-state-of-the-union-to-underline-campaign-theme/"&gt;previewing the address in a video&lt;/a&gt; posted on his re-election campaign website and emailed to supporters.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Because we can go in two directions: One is towards less opportunity and less fairness, or we can fight for where I think we need to go: building an economy that works for everyone, not just a wealthy few."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama intends to make &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-the-buffett-rule-returns/"&gt;tax fairness a central theme&lt;/a&gt; to illustrate his point, renewing a push for what he calls the Buffett Rule, a principle for tax reform that would ensure billionaires and millionaires do not pay a lower effective tax rate than members of the middle class.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The White House also plans to put a face on the issue, hosting &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-the-buffett-rule-returns/"&gt;Debbie Bosanek&lt;/a&gt;, aka Warren Buffet's secretary, who famously pays a higher tax rate (as a percentage of her income) than her billionaire boss, in the presidential box for the address.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_image_feature"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="leftRail.showStoryPhoto('rel_image_feature');" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Image]&amp;amp;lid=view[Image]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/gty_barack_obama_ll_120123_wg.jpg" width="199" height="112" class="c3" border="0" alt="PHOTO: Barack Obama" title=""/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Shahar Azran/WireImage&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="photo_caption"&gt;President Barack Obama s peaks during a... &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="leftRail.showStoryPhoto('rel_image_feature');" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Image]&amp;amp;lid=view[Image]"&gt;View Full Size&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/gty_barack_obama_ll_120123_wg.jpg" width="640" height="360" class="c1" border="0" alt="PHOTO: Barack Obama" title=""/&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_1"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_1','15419288',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_1]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/GMA/abc_gma_giffords_120123_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;Giffords Resigns in Video &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_1','15419288',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_1');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_2"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_2','15410744',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_2]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/abc_obama_weekly_120121_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;Obamas Visit Disney World &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_2','15410744',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_2');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_3"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_3','15400228',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_3]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/abc_pol_obama_sings2_120119_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;Obama Sings Soul in Harlem &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_3','15400228',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_3');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The class contrast and tax fairness issues, two of Obama's major re-election campaign themes, will get what is arguably it tjeor biggest audience yet with the nationally televised address in prime time. An estimated 43 million viewers watched Obama's State of the Union last year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But as Obama lays out what he calls &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-says-address-will-be-blueprint-for-joint-action/"&gt;a "blueprint" for the county&lt;/a&gt;, viewers may find that many of the ideas aren't all that new.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Proposals Obama put forward in 2011, from eliminating subsidies for oil companies, to overhauling No Child Left Behind and the nation's immigration system, &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-from-2011-in-2012-todays-qs-for-os-wh-1232012/"&gt;remain unresolved&lt;/a&gt;. Many of the infrastructure investments the president heralded have not gotten off the ground, while sweeping tax reform to "simplify the system and get rid of the loopholes" is still elusive.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"I think that any State of the Union address which lays out an agenda has to be ambitious. And if you got through a year and you achieved everything on your list, then you probably didn't aim high enough. So I think this president aims high," White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"There are absolutely things that remain undone that need to be done, that he will call on all of us to work together to get done in this address and beyond," he added. "But there is also a fairly comprehensive list of proposals that have been achieved, that I'm sure we'll be discussing as the year goes on."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Among those accomplishments are newly signed trade deals with South Korea, Panama and Colombia that had been in works since the Bush administration, a recently-launched effort to streamline and reorganize the federal agencies, and a new website for how tax dollars are spent -- all mentioned in the address one year ago.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Perhaps the biggest areas of achievement Obama will tout are in foreign and military policy: a successful raid that killed Osama bin Laden, a targeted international military operation in Libya that helped in the overthrow of Moammar Gadhafi, and an end to the war in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;White House aides say the overarching framework of the address, with the sweeping rhetoric and broad policy priorities of State of the Unions past, will "bookend" Obama's "fair shot" speech in Osawatomie, Kan., one month ago.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He will underline a vision of revitalizing American manufacturing, boosting energy production, invigorating skills training programs for American workers and a return to "American values," they say.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But will Republicans buy it?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Claims of optimism for a bipartisan embrace notwithstanding, the short answer is no.&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-6121947978474417990?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/6121947978474417990/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-to-address-do-nothing-congress.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/6121947978474417990'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/6121947978474417990'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-to-address-do-nothing-congress.html' title='Obama to Address &apos;Do-Nothing&apos; Congress'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-5422944307632923821</id><published>2012-01-25T00:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T00:00:05.143-08:00</updated><title type='text'>News Analysis: Obama Sets Sights on Romney in State of the Union</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;WASHINGTON â" &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Barack Obama." class="meta-per"&gt;President Obama&lt;/a&gt; did not mention &lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/mitt-romney?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Mitt Romney." class="meta-per"&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/a&gt; on Tuesday evening, but he didnât need to. Mr. Romney, whom the presidentâs aides still view as his most likely opponent in the fall, was the unspoken adversary in Mr. Obamaâs call for a more equitable society â" the natural foil for his proposals to level the playing field for middle-class Americans, from taxes to trade policy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;When Mr. Obama talked about levying a millionairesâ tax, he might have been referring to Mr. Romneyâs newly released tax return, which disclosed he paid a tax rate of 13.9 percent on income of more than $20 million in 2010.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;When he referred to his administrationâs bailout of the auto industry, noting that âsome even said we should let it die,â he could have been talking about Mr. Romneyâs argument that the carmakers should have been allowed to fail. And when he said he would oppose âany effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place,â he could have been referring to Mr. Romneyâs call for a rollback of regulations on Wall Street.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Nine months before he faces the voters, Mr. Obama seized what is likely to be one of his most prominent platforms of the year to draw a bright line between himself and Mr. Romney â" and, in the process, try to appeal to those frustrated by the deepening economic divide.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Gone was the soaring language of his last &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/state_of_the_union_message_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about the State of the Union address." class="meta-classifier"&gt;State of the Union address&lt;/a&gt;, when the president spoke of winning the future â" a challenge he likened to â&lt;a title="A transcript of the 2011 State of the Union address." href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/us/politics/26obama-text.html?pagewanted=all"&gt;our generationâs Sputnik moment&lt;/a&gt;.â With the tents of the Occupy protesters catching snow in American cities, he was tapping into a national sense of grievance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âWhen Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, itâs not because they envy the rich,â Mr. Obama said, answering Mr. Romneyâs charge that the president engages in the âbitter politics of envy.â âItâs because they understand that when I get tax breaks I donât need and the country canât afford, it either adds to the deficit or somebody else has to make up the difference.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;It is a theme he has struck repeatedly as his campaign has geared up, and &lt;a title="Times article." href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/us/politics/obama-strikes-populist-chord-with-speech-in-heartland.html"&gt;nowhere more forcefully than last month in Osawatomie, Kan.&lt;/a&gt;, where he invoked the spirit of Theodore Roosevelt, a Republican aristocrat who nevertheless broke up monopolies and campaigned for a progressive income tax.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Obamaâs appeal on Tuesday, studded as it was with the policy proposals that fill these addresses, did not match that populist fury. But in the august setting of the Capitol, squaring off against an often-hostile Congress, the president rolled out an election-year message that offers voters a stark choice between his vision and what he paints as the Darwinian approach of Mr. Romney and other Republicans.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;To some extent, Mr. Obama was also aiming his words at Florida, where Mr. Romney and the rest of the Republican field are competing in a primary next week over the right to challenge the president.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Every word in a State of the Union address is carefully chosen. So it was no accident that when the president discussed the auto industry and the future of American manufacturing, he said: âWhatâs happening in Detroit can happen in other industries. It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Those cities happen to be in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and North Carolina â" battleground states totaling 69 electoral votes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;But much of the presidentâs message was clearly intended to push back at his Republican rivals and their critiques of his record.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Lest anyone forget Mr. Romneyâs background at Bain Capital as an avid buyer and seller of companies, Mr. Obama offered a paean to permanence â" to companies built on a sturdy foundation of manufacturing and skilled workers. These businesses, he said, are the basis of a competitive economy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Obama also seemed to have Mr. Romney in mind when he announced new housing assistance and declared that âresponsible homeowners shouldnât have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.â Last year, Mr. Romney went to Nevada, the state hardest hit by &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/foreclosures/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about foreclosures." class="meta-classifier"&gt;foreclosures&lt;/a&gt;, and told a Las Vegas newspaper that the housing market needed to bottom out.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Obama also said he would oppose efforts to repeal &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/credit_crisis/financial_regulatory_reform/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about financial regulatory reform." class="meta-classifier"&gt;financial regulations&lt;/a&gt;, and he drew a direct link between the policies of his predecessor, George W. Bush, and the economic mess that has consumed his own presidency.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;In recent weeks, Mr. Obama has had a useful surrogate in &lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/newt-gingrich?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Newt Gingrich." class="meta-per"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;, the former House speaker, who has accused Mr. Romney of destroying jobs while at Bain and pressured him to release his tax returns.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;But Mr. Gingrich, whose victory in the South Carolina primary has turned him into a real competitor, did not escape a few jabs Tuesday night. Mr. Obama called for new rules to reduce the influence of lobbyists. Left unsaid was Mr. Gingrichâs disclosure on Monday that he had been paid $1.6 million to advise the mortgage giant Freddie Mac.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Romney was not silent on Mr. Obamaâs big day, earlier laying out his own case for leadership in a speech at a shuttered factory in Tampa, Fla. He argued that his 25 years in business had given him the skills to turn around the economy. The president, Mr. Romney said, âputs his faith in government; we put our faith in the American people.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âOurs is the party of free enterprise, free markets and consumer choice,â he said. âThe Republican Party stands for personal responsibility and equal opportunity. We donât demonize prosperity; we celebrate success.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Obama countered that he had turned things around, pointing to the revived auto industry, a recovering economy and three million private-sector jobs. And he flatly rejected the contention of Mr. Romney, Mr. Gingrich and other Republicans that he is presiding over a country in decline.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âAnyone who tells you otherwise,â the president said, âanyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesnât know what theyâre talking about.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="authorIdentification"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jonathan Weisman contributed reporting.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-5422944307632923821?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/5422944307632923821/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/news-analysis-obama-sets-sights-on.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5422944307632923821'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5422944307632923821'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/news-analysis-obama-sets-sights-on.html' title='News Analysis: Obama Sets Sights on Romney in State of the Union'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-4028276559428411570</id><published>2012-01-24T23:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T23:30:04.879-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Daniels' GOP response to State of the Union speech</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;div id="vine-inlineVideo__10229475" class="inlineVideo photo_align_block" data-contentid="10229475"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Gov. Mitch Daniels delivers the Republican response, saying that the loyal opposition puts "patriotism and national success ahead of party or ideology" and says the GOP "program of renewal" will rebuild the American dream.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;INDIANAPOLIS -- Here's the full text, as prepared for delivery,Â of Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels' Republican response to the president's State of the Union address to the nation:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The status of 'loyal opposition' imposes on those out of power some serious responsibilities: to show respect for the Presidency and its occupant, to express agreement where it exists. Republicans tonight salute our President, for instance, for his aggressive pursuit of the murderers of 9/11, and for bravely backing long overdue changes in public education. I personally would add to that list admiration for the strong family commitment that he and the First Lady have displayed to a nation sorely needing such examples.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;hr class="excerptEnd"/&gt;  &lt;p&gt;"On these evenings, Presidents naturally seek to find the sunny side of our national condition. But when President Obama claims that the state of our union is anything but grave, he must know in his heart that this is not true.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The President did not cause the economic and fiscal crises that continue in America tonight. But he was elected on a promise to fix them, and he cannot claim that the last three years have made things anything but worse: the percentage of Americans with a job is at the lowest in decades. One in five men of prime working age, and nearly half of all persons under 30, did not go to work today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"In three short years, an unprecedented explosion of spending, with borrowed money, has added trillions to an already unaffordable national debt. And yet, the President has put us on a course to make it radically worse in the years ahead. The federal government now spends one of every four dollars in the entire economy; it borrows one of every three dollars it spends. No nation, no entity, large or small, public or private, can thrive, or survive intact, with debts as huge as ours.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The President's grand experiment in trickle-down government has held back rather than sped economic recovery. He seems to sincerely believe we can build a middle class out of government jobs paid for with borrowed dollars. In fact, it works the other way: a government as big and bossy as this one is maintained on the backs of the middle class, and those who hope to join it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Those punished most by the wrong turns of the last three years are those unemployed or underemployed tonight, and those so discouraged that they have abandoned the search for work altogether. And no one has been more tragically harmed than the young people of this country, the first generation in memory to face a future less promising than their parents did.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"As Republicans our first concern is for those waiting tonight to begin or resume the climb up life's ladder. We do not accept that ours will ever be a nation of haves and have nots; we must always be a nation of haves and soon to haves.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"In our economic stagnation and indebtedness, we are only a short distance behind Greece, Spain, and other European countries now facing economic catastrophe. But ours is a fortunate land. Because the world uses our dollar for trade, we have a short grace period to deal with our dangers. But time is running out, if we are to avoid the fate of Europe, and those once-great nations of history that fell from the position of world leadership.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;"So 2012 is a year of true opportunity, maybe our last, to restore an America of hope and upward mobility, and greater equality. The challenges aren't matters of ideology, or party preference; the problems are simply mathematical, and the answers are purely practical.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"An opposition that would earn its way back to leadership must offer not just criticism of failures that anyone can see, but a positive and credible plan to make life better, particularly for those aspiring to make a better life for themselves. Republicans accept this duty, gratefully.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The routes back to an America of promise, and to a solvent America that can pay its bills and protect its vulnerable, start in the same place. The only way up for those suffering tonight, and the only way out of the dead end of debt into which we have driven, is a private economy that begins to grow and create jobs, real jobs, at a much faster rate than today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Contrary to the President's constant disparagement of people in business, it's one of the noblest of human pursuits. The late Steve Jobs - what a fitting name he had - created more of them than all those stimulus dollars the President borrowed and blew. Out here in Indiana, when a businessperson asks me what he can do for our state, I say 'First, make money. Be successful. If you make a profit, you'll have something left to hire someone else, and some to donate to the good causes we love.'&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The extremism that stifles the development of homegrown energy, or cancels a perfectly safe pipeline that would employ tens of thousands, or jacks up consumer utility bills for no improvement in either human health or world temperature, is a pro-poverty policy. It must be replaced by a passionate pro-growth approach that breaks all ties and calls all close ones in favor of private sector jobs that restore opportunity for all and generate the public revenues to pay our bills.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div id="vine-inlineVideo__10229509" class="inlineVideo photo_align_block" data-contentid="10229509"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Praising the Midwestern conservatism and mentions of "protecting the safety net," Chris Matthews says he understands why the GOP establishment is said to be rooting for Gov. Daniels.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;"That means a dramatically simpler tax system of fewer loopholes and lower rates. A pause in the mindless piling on of expensive new regulations that devour dollars that otherwise could be used to hire somebody. It means maximizing on the new domestic energy technologies that are the best break our economy has gotten in years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"There is a second item on our national must-do list: we must unite to save the safety net. Medicare and Social Security have served us well, and that must continue. But after half and three quarters of a century respectively, it's not surprising that they need some repairs. We can preserve them unchanged and untouched for those now in or near retirement, but we must fashion a new, affordable safety net so future Americans are protected, too.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;"Decades ago, for instance, we could afford to send millionaires pension checks and pay medical bills for even the wealthiest among us. Now, we can't, so the dollars we have should be devoted to those who need them most.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The mortal enemies of Social Security and Medicare are those who, in contempt of the plain arithmetic, continue to mislead Americans that we should change nothing. Listening to them much longer will mean that these proud programs implode, and take the American economy with them. It will mean that coming generations are denied the jobs they need in their youth and the protection they deserve in their later years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It's absolutely so that everyone should contribute to our national recovery, including of course the most affluent among us. There are smart ways and dumb ways to do this: the dumb way is to raise rates in a broken, grossly complex tax system, choking off growth without bringing in the revenues we need to meet our debts. The better course is to stop sending the wealthy benefits they do not need, and stop providing them so many tax preferences that distort our economy and do little or nothing to foster growth.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It's not fair and it's not true for the President to attack Republicans in Congress as obstacles on these questions. They and they alone have passed bills to reduce borrowing, reform entitlements, and encourage new job creation, only to be shot down time and time again by the President and his Democratic Senate allies.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"This year, it falls to Republicans to level with our fellow citizens about this reality: if we fail to act to grow the private sector and save the safety net, nothing else will matter much. But to make such action happen, we also must work, in ways we Republicans have not always practiced, to bring Americans together.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"No feature of the Obama Presidency has been sadder than its constant efforts to divide us, to curry favor with some Americans by castigating others. As in previous moments of national danger, we Americans are all in the same boat. If we drift, quarreling and paralyzed, over a Niagara of debt, we will all suffer, regardless of income, race, gender, or other category. If we fail to shift to a pro-jobs, pro-growth economic policy, there will never be enough public revenue to pay for our safety net, national security, or whatever size government we decide to have.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"As a loyal opposition, who put patriotism and national success ahead of party or ideology or any self-interest, we say that anyone who will join us in the cause of growth and solvency is our ally, and our friend. We will speak the language of unity. Let us rebuild our finances, and the safety net, and reopen the door to the stairway upward; any other disagreements we may have can wait.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;"You know, the most troubling contention in our national life these days isn't about economics, or policy at all. It's about us, as a free people. In two alarming ways, that contention is that we Americans just can't cut it anymore.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"In word and deed, the President and his allies tell us that we just cannot handle ourselves in this complex, perilous world without their benevolent protection. Left to ourselves, we might pick the wrong health insurance, the wrong mortgage, the wrong school for our kids; why, unless they stop us, we might pick the wrong light bulb!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"A second view, which I admit some Republicans also seem to hold, is that we Americans are no longer up to the job of self-government. We can't do the simple math that proves the unaffordability of today's safety net programs, or all the government we now have. We will fall for the con job that says we can just plow ahead and someone else will pick up the tab. We will allow ourselves to be pitted one against the other, blaming our neighbor for troubles worldwide trends or our own government has caused.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"2012 must be the year we prove the doubters wrong. The year we strike out boldly not merely to avert national bankruptcy but to say to a new generation that America is still the world's premier land of opportunity. Republicans will speak for those who believe in the dignity and capacity of the individual citizen; who believe that government is meant to serve the people rather than supervise them; who trust Americans enough to tell them the plain truth about the fix we are in, and to lay before them a specific, credible program of change big enough to meet the emergency we are facing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"We will advance our positive suggestions with confidence, because we know that Americans are still a people born to liberty. There is nothing wrong with the state of our Union that the American people, addressed as free-born, mature citizens, cannot set right. Republicans in 2012 welcome all our countrymen to a program of renewal that rebuilds the dream for all, and makes our 'city on a hill' shine once again."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-4028276559428411570?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/4028276559428411570/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/daniels-gop-response-to-state-of-union.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4028276559428411570'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4028276559428411570'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/daniels-gop-response-to-state-of-union.html' title='Daniels&apos; GOP response to State of the Union speech'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-4211641761668953685</id><published>2012-01-24T23:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T23:00:06.070-08:00</updated><title type='text'>TRANSCRIPT: GOP Rebuttal to State of the Union</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The following is the full text of Gov. &lt;a class="r_lapi" href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/mitch-daniels.htm#r_src=ramp"&gt;Mitch Daniels&lt;/a&gt;' Republican Address to the Nation, as prepared for delivery:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The status of 'loyal opposition' imposes on those out of power some serious responsibilities: to show respect for the Presidency and its occupant, to express agreement where it exists. Republicans tonight salute our President, for instance, for his aggressive pursuit of the murderers of 9/11, and for bravely backing long overdue changes in public education. I personally would add to that list admiration for the strong family commitment that he and the First Lady have displayed to a nation sorely needing such examples.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"On these evenings, Presidents naturally seek to find the sunny side of our national condition. But when &lt;a class="r_lapi" href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/obama-administration/barack-obama.htm#r_src=ramp"&gt;President Obama&lt;/a&gt; claims that the state of our union is anything but grave, he must know in his heart that this is not true.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The President did not cause the economic and fiscal crises that continue in America tonight. But he was elected on a promise to fix them, and he cannot claim that the last three years have made things anything but worse: the percentage of Americans with a job is at the lowest in decades. One in five men of prime working age, and nearly half of all persons under 30, did not go to work today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"In three short years, an unprecedented explosion of spending, with borrowed money, has added trillions to an already unaffordable national debt. And yet, the President has put us on a course to make it radically worse in the years ahead. The federal government now spends one of every four dollars in the entire economy; it borrows one of every three dollars it spends. No nation, no entity, large or small, public or private, can thrive, or survive intact, with debts as huge as ours.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The President's grand experiment in trickle-down government has held back rather than sped economic recovery. He seems to sincerely believe we can build a middle class out of government jobs paid for with borrowed dollars. In fact, it works the other way: a government as big and bossy as this one is maintained on the backs of the middle class, and those who hope to join it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Those punished most by the wrong turns of the last three years are those unemployed or underemployed tonight, and those so discouraged that they have abandoned the search for work altogether. And no one has been more tragically harmed than the young people of this country, the first generation in memory to face a future less promising than their parents did.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"As Republicans our first concern is for those waiting tonight to begin or resume the climb up life's ladder. We do not accept that ours will ever be a nation of haves and have nots; we must always be a nation of haves and soon to haves.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"In our economic stagnation and indebtedness, we are only a short distance behind &lt;a class="r_lapi" href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/greece.htm#r_src=ramp"&gt;Greece&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="r_lapi" href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/spain.htm#r_src=ramp"&gt;Spain&lt;/a&gt;, and other European countries now facing economic catastrophe. But ours is a fortunate land. Because the world uses our dollar for trade, we have a short grace period to deal with our dangers. But time is running out, if we are to avoid the fate of Europe, and those once-great nations of history that fell from the position of world leadership.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"So 2012 is a year of true opportunity, maybe our last, to restore an America of hope and upward mobility, and greater equality. The challenges aren't matters of ideology, or party preference; the problems are simply mathematical, and the answers are purely practical.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"An opposition that would earn its way back to leadership must offer not just criticism of failures that anyone can see, but a positive and credible plan to make life better, particularly for those aspiring to make a better life for themselves. Republicans accept this duty, gratefully.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The routes back to an America of promise, and to a solvent America that can pay its bills and protect its vulnerable, start in the same place. The only way up for those suffering tonight, and the only way out of the dead end of debt into which we have driven, is a private economy that begins to grow and create jobs, real jobs, at a much faster rate than today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Contrary to the President's constant disparagement of people in business, it's one of the noblest of human pursuits. The late &lt;a class="r_lapi" href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/technology/steve-jobs.htm#r_src=ramp"&gt;Steve Jobs&lt;/a&gt; - what a fitting name he had - created more of them than all those stimulus dollars the President borrowed and blew. Out here in Indiana, when a businessperson asks me what he can do for our state, I say 'First, make money. Be successful. If you make a profit, you'll have something left to hire someone else, and some to donate to the good causes we love.'&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The extremism that stifles the development of homegrown energy, or cancels a perfectly safe pipeline that would employ tens of thousands, or jacks up consumer utility bills for no improvement in either human health or world temperature, is a pro-poverty policy. It must be replaced by a passionate pro-growth approach that breaks all ties and calls all close ones in favor of private sector jobs that restore opportunity for all and generate the public revenues to pay our bills.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"That means a dramatically simpler tax system of fewer loopholes and lower rates. A pause in the mindless piling on of expensive new regulations that devour dollars that otherwise could be used to hire somebody. It means maximizing on the new domestic energy technologies that are the best break our economy has gotten in years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"There is a second item on our national must-do list: we must unite to save the safety net. &lt;a class="r_lapi" href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/health/healthy-aging/medicare.htm#r_src=ramp"&gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="r_lapi" href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/social-security.htm#r_src=ramp"&gt;Social Security&lt;/a&gt; have served us well, and that must continue. But after half and three quarters of a century respectively, it's not surprising that they need some repairs. We can preserve them unchanged and untouched for those now in or near retirement, but we must fashion a new, affordable safety net so future Americans are protected, too.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Decades ago, for instance, we could afford to send millionaires pension checks and pay medical bills for even the wealthiest among us. Now, we can't, so the dollars we have should be devoted to those who need them most.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"The mortal enemies of Social Security and Medicare are those who, in contempt of the plain arithmetic, continue to mislead Americans that we should change nothing. Listening to them much longer will mean that these proud programs implode, and take the American economy with them. It will mean that coming generations are denied the jobs they need in their youth and the protection they deserve in their later years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It's absolutely so that everyone should contribute to our national recovery, including of course the most affluent among us. There are smart ways and dumb ways to do this: the dumb way is to raise rates in a broken, grossly complex tax system, choking off growth without bringing in the revenues we need to meet our debts. The better course is to stop sending the wealthy benefits they do not need, and stop providing them so many tax preferences that distort our economy and do little or nothing to foster growth.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It's not fair and it's not true for the President to attack Republicans in Congress as obstacles on these questions. They and they alone have passed bills to reduce borrowing, reform entitlements, and encourage new job creation, only to be shot down time and time again by the President and his Democratic Senate allies.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"This year, it falls to Republicans to level with our fellow citizens about this reality: if we fail to act to grow the private sector and save the safety net, nothing else will matter much. But to make such action happen, we also must work, in ways we Republicans have not always practiced, to bring Americans together.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"No feature of the Obama Presidency has been sadder than its constant efforts to divide us, to curry favor with some Americans by castigating others. As in previous moments of national danger, we Americans are all in the same boat. If we drift, quarreling and paralyzed, over a Niagara of debt, we will all suffer, regardless of income, race, gender, or other category. If we fail to shift to a pro-jobs, pro-growth economic policy, there will never be enough public revenue to pay for our safety net, national security, or whatever size government we decide to have.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"As a loyal opposition, who put patriotism and national success ahead of party or ideology or any self-interest, we say that anyone who will join us in the cause of growth and solvency is our ally, and our friend. We will speak the language of unity. Let us rebuild our finances, and the safety net, and reopen the door to the stairway upward; any other disagreements we may have can wait.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"You know, the most troubling contention in our national life these days isn't about economics, or policy at all. It's about us, as a free people. In two alarming ways, that contention is that we Americans just can't cut it anymore.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"In word and deed, the President and his allies tell us that we just cannot handle ourselves in this complex, perilous world without their benevolent protection. Left to ourselves, we might pick the wrong health insurance, the wrong mortgage, the wrong school for our kids; why, unless they stop us, we might pick the wrong light bulb!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"A second view, which I admit some Republicans also seem to hold, is that we Americans are no longer up to the job of self-government. We can't do the simple math that proves the unaffordability of today's safety net programs, or all the government we now have. We will fall for the con job that says we can just plow ahead and someone else will pick up the tab. We will allow ourselves to be pitted one against the other, blaming our neighbor for troubles worldwide trends or our own government has caused.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"2012 must be the year we prove the doubters wrong. The year we strike out boldly not merely to avert national bankruptcy but to say to a new generation that America is still the world's premier land of opportunity. Republicans will speak for those who believe in the dignity and capacity of the individual citizen; who believe that government is meant to serve the people rather than supervise them; who trust Americans enough to tell them the plain truth about the fix we are in, and to lay before them a specific, credible program of change big enough to meet the emergency we are facing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"We will advance our positive suggestions with confidence, because we know that Americans are still a people born to liberty. There is nothing wrong with the state of our Union that the American people, addressed as free-born, mature citizens, cannot set right. Republicans in 2012 welcome all our countrymen to a program of renewal that rebuilds the dream for all, and makes our 'city on a hill' shine once again."&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-4211641761668953685?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/4211641761668953685/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/transcript-gop-rebuttal-to-state-of.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4211641761668953685'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4211641761668953685'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/transcript-gop-rebuttal-to-state-of.html' title='TRANSCRIPT: GOP Rebuttal to State of the Union'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-3057275550312350409</id><published>2012-01-24T22:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T22:30:05.124-08:00</updated><title type='text'>State of the Union: Fact Checking the President</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;ABC Newsâ Huma Khan, Elizabeth Hartfield, Matt Negrin, Chris Good, Amy Bingham, Jeunee Simon, Greg Krieg, Meg Fowler and Sarah Parnass report:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC1"&gt;Fact Check 1&lt;/a&gt; â" The Booming Economy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC2"&gt;Fact Check 2&lt;/a&gt; â" &lt;strong&gt;Obamaâs Plan for Foreclosures&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC3"&gt;Fact Check 3&lt;/a&gt; â" The American Auto Industry is Back&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC4"&gt;Fact Check 4&lt;/a&gt; â" Obamaâs Plug for Students&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC5"&gt;Fact Check 5&lt;/a&gt; â" The Rich, Their Secretaries and Taxes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC6"&gt;Fact Check 6&lt;/a&gt; â" &lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Soaring Energy Production and Advances in Offshore Drilling&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC7"&gt;Fact Check 7&lt;/a&gt; â" &lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Overseas&lt;/strong&gt; Tax Breaks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC8"&gt;Fact Check 8&lt;/a&gt; â" Can Obama Tax the Rich to Save the Debt?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC9"&gt;Fact Check 9&lt;/a&gt; â" Who Took on China More?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC10"&gt;Fact Check 10&lt;/a&gt; â" Milk Versus Oil&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC11"&gt;Fact Check 11&lt;/a&gt; â" Obama Repeats a Demand to Tone It Down&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/state-of-the-union-fact-checking-the-president/#FC12"&gt;Fact Check 12&lt;/a&gt; â" Stimulating the Stimulus and Using the War Funds to Pay Down the Debt&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC1"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 1 â" The Booming Economy: Obamaâs Jobs Story&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Did the economy crater before President Obamaâs inauguration, then rebound once his policies took effect?&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;It seems unlikely that the president would utter inaccurate jobs numbers during his State of the Union address, but while we wait for official White House citation, the president made at least one claim that for now looks iffy. The transcript:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;â&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs. And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect. Those are the facts. But so are these. In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs. Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005.â&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;4 million jobs lost in 6 months before Obama took office: Looks like this total falls short of 4 million. Subtracting the total employment listed in the &lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.htm"&gt;January 2009&lt;/a&gt; Bureau of Labor Statistics employment report from the same total in &lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_09052008.pdf"&gt;August 2008&lt;/a&gt;, one arrives at 3.378 million jobs lost.&lt;strong&gt;**&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Another 4 million jobs lost before Obamaâs policies took full effect. Using &lt;a href="http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth"&gt;this Bureau of Labor Statistics table&lt;/a&gt;, starting at February 2009, the sum of monthly job losses surpass 4 million in October 2009. President Obamaâs stimulus was passed in February 2009â"though it took notoriously long for that money to make its way out the door.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;3 million jobs created over 22 months, more jobs created in 2011 than in any year since 2005. Using total employment, Obamaâs numbers donât hold up. According to the same BLS table, the economy added 2.056 million jobs over 21 months (counting backward, the next month saw job losses). And 2011 saw more job growth than any year since 2006, not 2005. But &lt;a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/24/barack-obama/have-private-sector-jobs-grown-22-months-best-annu/"&gt;Politifact notes&lt;/a&gt; that Obamaâs statement was accurateâ"he was talking about private-sector jobs.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;**&lt;/strong&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/strong&gt; President Obama was referring exclusively to private-sector jobs when talking about jobs lost before his time in office, according to a White House official. Based on &lt;a href="http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth"&gt;this private-sector jobs chart&lt;/a&gt;, the economy lost 3.506 jobs in the six months before his inauguration, not 4 million.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC2"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 2 â" Obamaâs Plan for Foreclosures&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;âThatâs why Iâm sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it wonât add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.â&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Obama administration has announced a number of programs to salvage the housing market, which continues to be a drag on the U.S. economy. Today, the president was referring to a plan he announced in October from the front porch of a home in Las Vegas, which has one of the highest foreclosure rates in the country. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/president-obama-to-announce-new-program-to-help-struggling-homeowners/"&gt;The presidentâs plan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; would allow struggling homeowners who have mortgages backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac to refinance without getting a new appraisal or a full credit check. The program would also eliminate some risk-based fees for borrowers.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The proposal would alter the $75 billion Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, which was launched in 2009 to help distressed homeowners.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If a homeowner has a mortgage of $250,000 at a 6 percent interest rate, they would be able to take advantage of record low interest rates and refinance their home. If they got a rate thatâs 4.5 percent or lower, the homeowner would save $250 a month, or $3,000 a year. Given that there are 4 million homeowners who are backed by government-sponsored entities, the administration says the program can help millions of Americans.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the initial HARP program fell short of its initial goals, with only about 900,000 homeowners taking advantage of it, far less than what the administration had hoped. Additionally, many homeowners who took advantage of the program ended up defaulting again on their mortgage.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president tonight touted this new proposal as having no red tape or runaround from banks, but there are a number of caveats in his program. Only those who signed a mortgage before May 31, 2009, and have not refinanced previously under the Home Affordable Refinance Program are eligible for the new scheme. The loan-to-value ratio has to be greater than 80 percent. Borrowers must also have good credit and must have kept up with their mortgage payments, with no late payment in the past six months and no more than one late payment in the past 12 months.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Some economists calculate that it would only benefit 1 million households, a relatively small number given that more than 6 million homeowners are facing &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lpsvcs.com/LPSCorporateInformation/NewsRoom/Pages/20111021.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;foreclosure or have delinquent payments&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt; Others say the restrictions are too stringent and automatically cut out those under-water homeowners who have bad credit.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC3"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 3 â" The American Auto Industry is Back&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The manufacturing sector is a key part of Obamaâs âBlueprint for An America Built to Last,â which he outlined in his state of the union address, and a key part of that sector is the American automobile industry. âOn the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse â¦ and tonight, the American auto industry is back,â Obama said in his address.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When Obama took office in 2008 the American auto industry was indeed in crisis. General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford were all facing financial turmoil, and seeking government bailouts in order to stay afloat. In 2009, Obama hired Steve Rattner to serve as his car czar, and oversee the federal bailout of these three American institutions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Today, General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford have turned around. General Motors recently reclaimed its place as the top-selling automaker in the world, ousting the previous top-seller, Toyota. Chrysler is currently Americaâs fastest growing car company, and Ford recently announced plans to invest $446 million in manufacturing in Brazil.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As part of this claim, Obama gave a subtle jab to his one of the GOP presidential candidates, Mitt Romney. On the topic of the auto industry, Obama said âsome even said we should let it die.â That comment was likely a reference to the former Massachusetts governorâs 2008 &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opinion/19romney.html" target="_blank"&gt;Op-Ed piece in the New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; titled âLet Detroit Go Bankrupt,â in which Romney argued against a bailout for the industry.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC4"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 4 â" Debt Serious: Obamaâs Plug for Students&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In his State of the Union speech tonight, President Obama said Congress should slow interest rates on student loans because âAmericans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As of late 2010, thatâs true. In September, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2010/09/20/student-loan-debt-surpasses-credit-card-debt/" target="_blank"&gt;a student aid study&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; reported that Americans owed $830 billion in student loan debt, and $825 billion in credit card debt.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The National Center for Education Statistics &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=31" target="_blank"&gt;says&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: â38 percent [of all undergraduates in 2007-08] took out an average of $7,100 in student loans â¦ and 4 percent of students had parents who took out an average of $10,800 in Parent PLUS loans. â¦ 34 percent of all undergraduates took out federal Stafford loans averaging a total of $5,000. Subsidized Stafford loans were received by 30 percent of undergraduates and averaged $3,400, while 22 percent received an average of $3,200 in unsubsidized Stafford loans.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC5"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 5 â" The Rich, Their Secretaries and Taxes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Treasury Secretary Geithner yesterday declined to answer a key question about the presidentâs proposed âBuffett Ruleâ: How many millionaires and billionaires pay lower tax rates than middle-income families?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The answer: not that many.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/fact-check-the-richtheir-secretaries-and-taxes/"&gt;Read more from ABC Newsâ Jon Karl here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC6"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 6 â" &lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Soaring Energy Production and Advances in Offshore Drilling&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy. Over the last three years, weâve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, Iâm directing my Administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Right now, American oil production is the highest that itâs been in eight years. Thatâs right â" eight years. Not only that â" last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president tonight touted the rise in domestic energy production and a decrease in U.S. oil imports during his term. While his claims on oil production are true, they donât quite live up to the facts when it comes to imports.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In 2010 â" the most recent full year for which the U.S. Energy Information Administration has published data â" crude oil production was the highest since 2003. Total energy production, which includes fossil fuels and renewable energy, was the highest it has been since the EIA started recording the data in 1949. &lt;a href="http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/sec1_7.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;Read more from the EIA here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the first seven months of 2011, total production was more than 5 percent higher than during the same time period in 2009, and the total numbers for the full year 2011 looked to surpass 2010. &lt;a href="http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/sec1_3.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;Read more from the EIA here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, offshore oil production has grown under Obama despite the moratorium on deepwater drilling that he imposed in 2010, following the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Oil production in the Gulf of Mexico was at record levels that year. In 2009, total oil production from the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf was the highest since 2003, according to data from the &lt;a href="http://www.boemre.gov/stats/ocsproduction.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Imports have dropped over the years, especially from oil-rich Middle Eastern countries. But the presidentâs assertion that foreign oil imports are the lowest in the past 16 years may not completely be true. The United States imported more petroleum in 2010 than it did in 2009, &lt;a href="http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/sec1_5.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;according to the EIA&lt;/a&gt;. And total imports in 2010 â" including that of oil and coal â" were lowest in 13 years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC7"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 7 â" Overseas Tax Breaks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama called tonight for America to âstop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America.â&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;âRight now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas,â Obama said at in his third State of the Union address Tuesday night.Â âMeanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world.Â  It makes no sense, and everyone knows it.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president was correct in saying that business can lower their tax rates by fleeing U.S. soil. Of the 34 developed countries that make up the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, America has the second-highest corporate tax rate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;U.S.-based companies are taxed at 35 percent by the federal government. Add state taxes to that and the average corporate tax rate is 39.2 percent. Only Japanâs is higher at 39.5 percent, according to OECD data from 2011.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But when tax deductions and loopholes are factored into the equation, the U.S. corporate rate falls to roughly 27 percent, according to the Tax Foundation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And according toÂ &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/11/focus-0" target="_blank"&gt;a study by the Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, 280 of the corporations on the Fortune 500 list paid an average rate of 18.5 percent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama also called for a âbasic minimum taxâ on every multinational corporation to prevent companies from outsourcing to overseas tax havens.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obamaâs approach on this issue is virtually the opposite of his GOP presidential rivals. Nearly every Republican presidential candidate has called for U.S. companies that earn profits overseas to be able to bring those profits back to America tax-free.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As the tax code stands now, those companies have to pay the U.S. government the difference between the lower, foreign tax rates and the often higher U.S. tax rate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president said he wants to increase tax cuts for American manufacturers and double the deduction for high-tech manufacturers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Manufacturers already receive multiple tax credits and deductions that the lower their collective taxes by about $58 billion annually,Â &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2011/02/09/10-Big-Corporate-Tax-Breaks.aspx#page2" target="_blank"&gt;the Fiscal Times reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As of 2010, tax credits for investing in new facilities focused primarily on energy efficiency. For example, $240 million of deductions were given to corporations that invested in clean coal facilities in 2011. About $39 billion worth of deductions went to support investments in machinery and equipment.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC8"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 8 â" The Tax Man Is Hereth: Can Obama Tax the Rich to Save the Debt?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;President Obama suggested in his speech tonight that taxing the rich will âreduce our deficit.â Unfortunately, tax experts disagree.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama need look no further than the two men he chose to lead his deficit commission, Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles. TheyÂ &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/our-advice-to-the-debt-supercommittee-go-big-be-bold-be-smart/2011/09/30/gIQAPzjBBL_story.html"&gt;wrote in The Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: âThe president must be willing to support real savings in entitlements that deal with long-term costs. We canât simply cut or tax our way out of this problem. Bringing our debt under control will require tackling the growth of entitlements and reforming the tax code to promote economic growth and generate enough revenue to meet our commitments.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hereâs what Obama said in his speech:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;âWe need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes.Â â¦ If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes.Â â¦ Asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes?Â Most Americans would call that common sense.Â â¦ When I get a tax break I donât need and the country canât afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference â" like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet.Â Thatâs not right.Â  Americans know itâs not right.Â They know that this generationâs success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to the future of their country, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility.Â Thatâs how weâll reduce our deficit.Â Thatâs an America built to last.â&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC9"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 9 â" &lt;strong&gt;Manchurian Trade Rate: Who Took on China More?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;President Obama said tonight that heâs âbrought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;President Bush filed seven complaints with the World Trade Organization against China, over eight years. Obama has filed five in three years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obamaâs team must have done some math: If Obama keeps that rate the same, heâll have filed about 13 by the time his (presumptive) second term ends. Thatâs just one short of 14, which would be, as Obama said, twice as much as Bushâs seven.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The White House didnât support the anti-piracy bill known as &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a title="Amid Internet Blackouts, Support for Anti-Piracy Bills Dwindling in Congress?" href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/amid-internet-blackouts-support-for-anti-piracy-bills-dwindling-in-congress/"&gt;SOPA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, though the administration did voice support for a kind of legislation that addressed piracy. âAny provision covering Internet intermediaries such as online advertising networks, payment processors, or search engines must be transparent and designed to prevent overly broad private rights of action that could encourage unjustified litigation that could discourage startup businesses and innovative firms from growing,â a White House statement said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC10"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 10 â" A Milk Spill Was Equal To An Oil Spill In The Eyes of Federal Rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As an example of his record on getting rid of unnecessary federal regulations, President Obama cited the elimination of a rule that classified a milk spill as a type of oil spill.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;While the comparison seems odd, it is indeed based in an old federal law. An obscure quirk in an EPA rule called the Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) rule classified milk as a type of oil. The logic behind the rule, which went into effect in the 1970s, was that milk fat is a type of animal fat, and is therefore technically a type of oil. The rule was finally altered in August 2011, resulting in the exemption of milk and milk product containers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The larger claim Obama sought to make through the utilization of this milk example is that he has generally been against increasing regulations. He asserted that he has approved fewer regulations in the first three years of his presidency than George W. Bush did in his first three years. This claim is true. In the first 33 months of his presidency Obama approved 613 federal rules, while President George W. Bush had approved 643 in the same time frame, according to an analysis byÂ &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-25/obama-wrote-5-fewer-rules-than-bush-while-costing-business.html" target="_blank"&gt;Bloomberg News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;However that same analysis notes that while the number of regulations approved by Obama alone is smaller, he has approved a larger number of federal rules that carry a price tag of more than $100 million than his Republican predecessor had at the same point in his presidency. Obama has approved 129 of these rules, while Bush had approved 90.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC11"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 11 â" Itâs Getting Hot in Here: Obama Repeats a Demand to Tone It Down&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Remember last January, when President Obama flew to Arizona after Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot and called on the countryâs political class to take it down a notch?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âBut at a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized â" at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who think differently than we do â" itâs important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds,â Obama said a year ago. âWhat we canât do is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on one another.Â As we discuss these issues, let each of us do so with a good dose of humility. Rather than pointing fingers or assigning blame, let us use this occasion to expand our moral imaginations, to listen to each other more carefully, to sharpen our instincts for empathy, and remind ourselves of all the ways our hopes and dreams are bound together.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twelve months later, Obamaâs message is about the same. To be sure, itâs been a heated year â" with the debt ceiling debate, the Republican primary and more.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama said near the end of his State of the Union speech tonight: âNone of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town.Â We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction, that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a name="FC12"/&gt;Fact or Fiction Number 12 â" Can President Obama Stimulate the Stimulus and Use the War Funds to Pay Down the Debt and Build New Roads?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;President Obama has promised quite a lot tonight, but never so much as in the fevered paragraph below.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Weâll take it line by line:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In the next few weeks, I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president wasnât the first to say it, but he did admit as much â" â&lt;em&gt;Shovel ready wasnât&lt;/em&gt;Â quite as, uh,Â &lt;em&gt;shovel ready&lt;/em&gt;Â as we thought,â he told his Council on Jobs and Competitiveness when they met in Durham, N.C., last June. He was referring to the AmericanÂ Recovery and Reinvestment Act, better known as âthe stimulus,â a plan to spend approximately $787 billion on infrastructure renewal, âcreating and savingâ millions of jobs in the process. But the building of the roads and rails has been slow. Bickering over contracts and other issues have plagued the program. It is not clear what, if anything, the president can do to stimulate his stimulus.Â  A single executive order hardly seems like itâd be enough.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;But you need to fund these projects.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;True, but that was what the stimulus Â money had been meant for, right?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Take the money weâre no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Sounds simple, right? Not so fast. When it comes to government, âa penny savedâ is often confused with âa penny not spent.â The dollars that the U.S. will not spend in Iraq and Afghanistan (as the latter conflict winds down) do not get thrown back into some imaginary pot (Republicans might say, âslush fundâ) for paying down the debt or building high-speed railways. In fact, the billions authorized by the Federal government for fighting abroad helped to create that debt. Less spending on the war front will surely help with the bottom line, but it is not a newly realized rainy-day fund.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-3057275550312350409?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/3057275550312350409/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/state-of-union-fact-checking-president.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3057275550312350409'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3057275550312350409'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/state-of-union-fact-checking-president.html' title='State of the Union: Fact Checking the President'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-5659160468333488298</id><published>2012-01-24T22:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T22:00:03.982-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama declares 'we've come too far to turn back now'</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;div id="vine-inlinePhoto__10228026" data-contentid="10228026" class="inlinePhoto photo_landscape photo_align_block c5"&gt;&lt;img id="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120124-obama-16x9_250p.jpg" src="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120124-obama-16x9_250p.photoblog600.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="338"/&gt;&lt;p class="photo_credit"&gt;Kevin Lamarque / Reuters&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="photo_credit_container"&gt; &lt;p&gt;U.S. President Barack Obama attends a campaign fund raiser at the Apollo Theater in New York January 19, 2012.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;By Tom Curry, msnbc.com National Affairs Writer&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With a still unfinished legislative agenda from last year and with Election Day nine months from now, President Barack Obama will go before a joint session of Congress at 9 p.m. ET to offer his proposals for this session of Congress and to paint sharp contrasts with his Republican foes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In excerpts from the speech released by the White House, Obama paints a dire scenario of a nation divided into a wealthy elite and a mass of struggling Americans on the verge of insolvency.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWe can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by,â Obama said in the prepared remarks. âOr we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules."&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The president vows that âwe will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profitsâ and says he wants to âlay out a blueprint for an economy thatâs built to last â" an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a nod to bipartisanship, Obama says in the prepared remarks, "I will work with anyone in this chamberâ to build on the momentum of a growing economy.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But he adds that âI intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div id="vine-inlineVideo__10228006" class="inlineVideo photo_align_block" data-contentid="10228006"&gt; &lt;p&gt;David Plouffe, a senior adviser to President Obama, talks to TODAY's Ann Curry about the 2012 presidential race and previews President Obama's State of the Union address.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will speak against the backdrop of an improving economy which is slowly recovering from the recession of 2007-2009. Employment has shown signs of revival in recent months, with the jobless rate falling from 10 percent in October of 2009 to 8.5 percent last month.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But there were still almost one million fewer people employed last month than when Obama signed his $825 billion stimulus bill into law in February 2009.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama also speaks at a time when his re-election prospects are uncertain, even though his would-be Republican presidential rivals have been spending most of their energy launching rhetorical assaults on each other.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the most recent Gallup Poll, Obama has a 44 percent approval rating.Â  Gallup said that, compared to other elected presidents' third-year averages, âObama's 44 percent is among the lowest, better than only Jimmy Carter's 37 percent average in 1979-1980.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But Gallup added that Ronald Reagan's third-year average approval rating of 45 percent was similar to Obama's.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Faced with a recession and a recovery as Obama now is, Reagan ended up winning a second term by a landslide over Democrat Walter Mondale.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will speak Tuesday night with his signature first-term achievement â" a historic overhaul of health insurance and an expansion of Medicaid â" under the shadow of a pending decision by the Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Oral arguments before the justices on the constitutionality of the health insurance overhaul will stretch over three days in late March. The high court is considering not only whether the requirement to buy insurance is constitutional, but whether the states can be forced to expand their Medicaid programs, as the law orders them to do.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Obamaâs ability to get Congress pay for any new proposal he might make is boxed in by controls on spending which he signed into law last year as part of an accord with Congress to raise the limit on federal borrowing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Any new program would likely come in the category of discretionary outlays, the part of the budget that Congress controls through annual appropriation bills. Discretionary spending amounted to $1.35 trillion in 2011, 40 percent of total outlays, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Slightly more than half of that spending was for defense.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the Budget Control Act which Obama signed last summer imposes limits on discretionary spending. For 2012 and 2013, the caps would keep spending for items other than the Afghanistan war below the 2011 spending level and would limit the growth of those appropriations to about two percent a year from 2014 to 2021, according to the CBO.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Meanwhile entitlement spending â" the 40 percent of the budget that goes to Medicare for the elderly, Medicaid for the poor, and Social Security for the disabled and retired â" continues to grow steadily, driven by an aging population.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama faces a House of Representatives with 242 Republicans â" the most that any Democratic president has had to face since Harry Truman in 1947.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As Truman did in the 1948 presidential campaign, Obama is sure to lambaste the Republican majority as an obstructionist, do-nothing Congress. Republicans are returning fire by saying the House has passed more than two dozen separate job creation bills and the Democratic-controlled Senate hasnât acted on them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWe donât blame the president and the Democratic Congress thatâs been running this place for the last three years for what theyâve inherited,â said Tennessee Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander. âBut we do hold them responsible for what they have done during the last three years. Theyâve been in charge, theyâve made it worse, and we know how to make it better. Weâve advanced a number of proposals to close tax loopholes, reduce the debt, lower tax rates, lower health care costs, find more American energy and use less.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama is expected to expand Tuesday night on the âfairnessâ theme he discussed in his Kansas speech last month.Â  In that speech Obama said, ârebuilding this economy based on fair play, a fair shot, and a fair share will require all of us to see that we have a stake in each otherâs success.â&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;He made the case for raising taxes on higher-income people who have income from capital gains and dividends.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama advisor David Plouffe was asked on the Today show Tuesday about GOP presidential contender Mitt Romneyâs 2010 tax return which showed him paying $3 million in income taxes on $21.6 million in income.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Plouffe said, âItâs a good example â¦ Â of the tax reform we need. Warren Buffett said he should not be paying less taxes â" as a rate â" than his secretary. The president is going actually tonight to lay out some specifics on the Buffett rule â" what it means how itâs going to work.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;About 80 percent of Romneyâs income came from dividends and capital gains which are taxed at 15 percent, instead of at the top rate for wage and salary income, 35 percent. With only a brief interval, capital gains have enjoyed preferential tax treatment since the 1920s.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama proposalâs to revive American manufacturing comes after more than half a century in which manufacturingâs share of employment has been falling.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;According to the Congressional Budget Office report, âthe rapid growth of productivity in manufacturing has accounted for a substantial fraction of the decline in manufacturing employment and hours.â The CBO said productivity in manufacturingÂ  â" more output from fewer workers â" had risen by about one-third from 2000 to 2008.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-5659160468333488298?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/5659160468333488298/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-declares-weve-come-too-far-to.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5659160468333488298'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5659160468333488298'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-declares-weve-come-too-far-to.html' title='Obama declares &apos;we&apos;ve come too far to turn back now&apos;'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-1817144034624225562</id><published>2012-01-24T21:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T21:30:03.155-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama to lay out blueprint for economy 'built to last' in SOTU</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;div id="vine-inlinePhoto__10228026" data-contentid="10228026" class="inlinePhoto photo_landscape photo_align_block c5"&gt;&lt;img id="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120124-obama-16x9_250p.jpg" src="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120124-obama-16x9_250p.photoblog600.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="338"/&gt;&lt;p class="photo_credit"&gt;Kevin Lamarque / Reuters&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="photo_credit_container"&gt; &lt;p&gt;U.S. President Barack Obama attends a campaign fund raiser at the Apollo Theater in New York January 19, 2012.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;By Tom Curry, msnbc.com National Affairs Writer&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With a still unfinished legislative agenda from last year and with Election Day nine months from now, President Barack Obama will go before a joint session of Congress at 9 p.m. ET to offer his proposals for this session of Congress and to paint sharp contrasts with his Republican foes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In excerpts from the speech released by the White House, Obama paints a dire scenario of a nation divided into a wealthy elite and a mass of struggling Americans on the verge of insolvency.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWe can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by,â Obama said in the prepared remarks. âOr we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules."&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The president vows that âwe will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profitsâ and says he wants to âlay out a blueprint for an economy thatâs built to last â" an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a nod to bipartisanship, Obama says in the prepared remarks, "I will work with anyone in this chamberâ to build on the momentum of a growing economy.Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But he adds that âI intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div id="vine-inlineVideo__10228006" class="inlineVideo photo_align_block" data-contentid="10228006"&gt; &lt;p&gt;David Plouffe, a senior adviser to President Obama, talks to TODAY's Ann Curry about the 2012 presidential race and previews President Obama's State of the Union address.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will speak against the backdrop of an improving economy which is slowly recovering from the recession of 2007-2009. Employment has shown signs of revival in recent months, with the jobless rate falling from 10 percent in October of 2009 to 8.5 percent last month.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But there were still almost one million fewer people employed last month than when Obama signed his $825 billion stimulus bill into law in February 2009.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama also speaks at a time when his re-election prospects are uncertain, even though his would-be Republican presidential rivals have been spending most of their energy launching rhetorical assaults on each other.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the most recent Gallup Poll, Obama has a 44 percent approval rating.Â  Gallup said that, compared to other elected presidents' third-year averages, âObama's 44 percent is among the lowest, better than only Jimmy Carter's 37 percent average in 1979-1980.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But Gallup added that Ronald Reagan's third-year average approval rating of 45 percent was similar to Obama's.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Faced with a recession and a recovery as Obama now is, Reagan ended up winning a second term by a landslide over Democrat Walter Mondale.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will speak Tuesday night with his signature first-term achievement â" a historic overhaul of health insurance and an expansion of Medicaid â" under the shadow of a pending decision by the Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Oral arguments before the justices on the constitutionality of the health insurance overhaul will stretch over three days in late March. The high court is considering not only whether the requirement to buy insurance is constitutional, but whether the states can be forced to expand their Medicaid programs, as the law orders them to do.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Obamaâs ability to get Congress pay for any new proposal he might make is boxed in by controls on spending which he signed into law last year as part of an accord with Congress to raise the limit on federal borrowing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Any new program would likely come in the category of discretionary outlays, the part of the budget that Congress controls through annual appropriation bills. Discretionary spending amounted to $1.35 trillion in 2011, 40 percent of total outlays, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Slightly more than half of that spending was for defense.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the Budget Control Act which Obama signed last summer imposes limits on discretionary spending. For 2012 and 2013, the caps would keep spending for items other than the Afghanistan war below the 2011 spending level and would limit the growth of those appropriations to about two percent a year from 2014 to 2021, according to the CBO.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Meanwhile entitlement spending â" the 40 percent of the budget that goes to Medicare for the elderly, Medicaid for the poor, and Social Security for the disabled and retired â" continues to grow steadily, driven by an aging population.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama faces a House of Representatives with 242 Republicans â" the most that any Democratic president has had to face since Harry Truman in 1947.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As Truman did in the 1948 presidential campaign, Obama is sure to lambaste the Republican majority as an obstructionist, do-nothing Congress. Republicans are returning fire by saying the House has passed more than two dozen separate job creation bills and the Democratic-controlled Senate hasnât acted on them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWe donât blame the president and the Democratic Congress thatâs been running this place for the last three years for what theyâve inherited,â said Tennessee Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander. âBut we do hold them responsible for what they have done during the last three years. Theyâve been in charge, theyâve made it worse, and we know how to make it better. Weâve advanced a number of proposals to close tax loopholes, reduce the debt, lower tax rates, lower health care costs, find more American energy and use less.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama is expected to expand Tuesday night on the âfairnessâ theme he discussed in his Kansas speech last month.Â  In that speech Obama said, ârebuilding this economy based on fair play, a fair shot, and a fair share will require all of us to see that we have a stake in each otherâs success.â&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;He made the case for raising taxes on higher-income people who have income from capital gains and dividends.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama advisor David Plouffe was asked on the Today show Tuesday about GOP presidential contender Mitt Romneyâs 2010 tax return which showed him paying $3 million in income taxes on $21.6 million in income.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Plouffe said, âItâs a good example â¦ Â of the tax reform we need. Warren Buffett said he should not be paying less taxes â" as a rate â" than his secretary. The president is going actually tonight to lay out some specifics on the Buffett rule â" what it means how itâs going to work.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;About 80 percent of Romneyâs income came from dividends and capital gains which are taxed at 15 percent, instead of at the top rate for wage and salary income, 35 percent. With only a brief interval, capital gains have enjoyed preferential tax treatment since the 1920s.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama proposalâs to revive American manufacturing comes after more than half a century in which manufacturingâs share of employment has been falling.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;According to the Congressional Budget Office report, âthe rapid growth of productivity in manufacturing has accounted for a substantial fraction of the decline in manufacturing employment and hours.â The CBO said productivity in manufacturingÂ  â" more output from fewer workers â" had risen by about one-third from 2000 to 2008.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-1817144034624225562?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/1817144034624225562/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-to-lay-out-blueprint-for-economy.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1817144034624225562'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1817144034624225562'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-to-lay-out-blueprint-for-economy.html' title='Obama to lay out blueprint for economy &apos;built to last&apos; in SOTU'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-5084083466957303279</id><published>2012-01-24T21:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T21:00:04.438-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Boehner Uses Romney's Tax Returns to Attack Obama</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="innerbody"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jan 24, 2012 7:50pm&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" title="Boehner Uses Romney&amp;#x2019;s Tax Returns to Attack Obama" description="House Speaker John Boehner offered a show of support for Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor released two years of tax returns today, and used the opportunity to attack President Obama. In response to requests from his rivals and his supporters, Romney released his..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" title="Boehner Uses Romney&amp;#x2019;s Tax Returns to Attack Obama" description="House Speaker John Boehner offered a show of support for Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor released two years of tax returns today, and used the opportunity to attack President Obama. In response to requests from his rivals and his supporters, Romney released his..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" title="Boehner Uses Romney&amp;#x2019;s Tax Returns to Attack Obama" description="House Speaker John Boehner offered a show of support for Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor released two years of tax returns today, and used the opportunity to attack President Obama. In response to requests from his rivals and his supporters, Romney released his..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="font-toggle"&gt; &lt;p&gt;House Speaker John Boehner offered a show of support for Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor released two years of tax returns today, and used the opportunity to attack President Obama.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In response to requests from his rivals and his supporters, Romney released his returns for 2010 and his estimates for 2011 this morning. TheÂ &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/mitt-romney-made-42-million-paid-14-percent/story?id=15423615#.Tx8EssWiG8B"&gt;returns&lt;/a&gt;Â show that Romney earned $42 million in the past two years and paid $6 million in taxes â" a rate of 13.9 percent in 2010 and 15.3 percent in 2011.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âWell, we all know that thereâs a reason we have low rates on capital gains. Thatâs because it spurs new investment in our economy and allows capital to move more quickly,â Boehner told reporters at a news conference, reports ABCâs John Parkinson. âAnd this electionâs going to be a referendum on the presidentâs economic policies. His policies have failed.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Earlier, Boehner, R-Ohio, told &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/speaker-boehner-asked-about-romney-tax-rates-points-to-ge-as-face-of-broken-tax-system/"&gt;ABC Newsâ Jake Tapper&lt;/a&gt; that Romneyâs returns donât show anything wrong with the tax system, adding, âGeneral Electric is more the face of a broken tax system.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After the all of the speculation leading up to their release it comes as no surprise thatÂ have been the subject of a lot of discussion throughout the course of the day.Â Amid talk of the upcoming &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/10-things-to-watch-for-in-state-of-the-union/"&gt;State of the Union&lt;/a&gt; address, hereâs a look at what Republicans and Democrats have been saying about the documents.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Democratsâ reactions have ranged from mildly critical to harsh.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;ABCâs Sunlen Miller reports that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid referred to Romneyâs tax records as âa little strange.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âI think itâs a little strange that someone thatâs making that much money is paying less taxes than Warren Buffettâs secretary,â Reid told reporters.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Democratic National Committee executive director Patrick Gaspard described the release as âlimitedâ and âinsufficient,â &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/dnc-director-romney-tax-release-limited-insufficient/"&gt;reports ABCâs Devin Dwyer&lt;/a&gt;. In an conference call to reporters Gaspard, a former White House political director, asserted that Romneyâs decision to limit the release of his returns to just the past two years âweakensâ Romneyâs candidacy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âRomneyâs failure to release years worth of tax returns not only defies precedent for presidential candidates â¦ but it further weakens the central premise of Romneyâs candidacy,â Gaspard said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The documents have also been the subject of some critique on the campaign trail.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/santorum-on-romneys-tax-return-congratulations-on-income-but-it-may-alienate-him-from-average-voter/"&gt;ABCâs Shushannah Walshe&lt;/a&gt; reports that GOP presidential hopeful Rick Santorum took a subtle approach in his commentary on his opponentâs finances. Santorum congratulated Romney on the amount of money he earned in 2010, and took the opportunity to out that in the past, voters have had a harder time relating to millionaire candidates.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;ââHaving someone that wealthy â" was it an issue? Was it an issue in John Kerryâs campaign? It was,â Santorum said, referring to Massachusetts Sen. John Kerryâs presidential bid in 2004. âThat may be an issue with Governor Romney and his appeal to people.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romneyâs tax rate tracks closely to the capital gains tax rate, which is currently 15 percent. The average effective tax rate for Americans is 11 percent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;ABC Newsâ Jake Tapper, John Parkinson, Sunlen Miller, Devin Dwyer and Shushannah Walshe contributed to this report.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;h6 class="tagged"&gt;SHOWS: &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/topics/show/world-news/" rel="tag"&gt;World News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h6&gt; &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" title="Boehner Uses Romney&amp;#x2019;s Tax Returns to Attack Obama" description="House Speaker John Boehner offered a show of support for Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor released two years of tax returns today, and used the opportunity to attack President Obama. In response to requests from his rivals and his supporters, Romney released his..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" title="Boehner Uses Romney&amp;#x2019;s Tax Returns to Attack Obama" description="House Speaker John Boehner offered a show of support for Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor released two years of tax returns today, and used the opportunity to attack President Obama. In response to requests from his rivals and his supporters, Romney released his..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" title="Boehner Uses Romney&amp;#x2019;s Tax Returns to Attack Obama" description="House Speaker John Boehner offered a show of support for Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor released two years of tax returns today, and used the opportunity to attack President Obama. In response to requests from his rivals and his supporters, Romney released his..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to-attack-obama/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-5084083466957303279?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/5084083466957303279/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5084083466957303279'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5084083466957303279'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/boehner-uses-romneys-tax-returns-to.html' title='Boehner Uses Romney&apos;s Tax Returns to Attack Obama'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-7498803613447492801</id><published>2012-01-24T20:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T20:30:05.383-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Washington Memo: State of the Union? More Like State of the Campaign</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Republicans have good reason to believe that whenÂ President Obama delivers the &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/state_of_the_union_message_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about the State of the Union address." class="meta-classifier"&gt;State of the Union address&lt;/a&gt; on Tuesday night, his goals are more partisan than presidential.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Obama has shifted into full-bore campaigning. He expects little from Congress this year beyondÂ the extension of existing &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/federal_budget_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about the federal budget." class="meta-classifier"&gt;payroll tax&lt;/a&gt; cuts. HisÂ highest-profile initiatives are designed to enhance his re-election prospects.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Where Republicans stand on shakier ground is in their assessment of Mr. Obamaâs ultimate destination. On the principal conflict between the two parties this past year â" over paring long-term debt and deficits â" the president can still stake a stronger claim to the political center than his Republican antagonists.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Polls show that Mr. &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/federal_budget_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="Recent and archival news about the federal budget." class="meta-classifier"&gt;Obamaâs budget&lt;/a&gt; positions are closer to those of most voters than the Republican positions are. His ultimate goal, advisers say, remains a bipartisan deficit deal along the lines of the one he nearly negotiated with Speaker John A. Boehner.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âHeâs into full re-election mode, which is populistic in tone,â observed Alan Simpson, a Republican who was co-chairman of a presidential deficit reduction commission with Erskine Bowles, a Democrat. But Mr. Simpson, a former senator from Wyoming, said Mr. Obama could credibly argue that he had sought a âbalancedâ plan of spending cuts and tax increases, while Congressional Republicans had not.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;And if the presidentâs feisty rhetoric about tax fairness and inequality helps win him a second term, he might even find Republicans easier to negotiate with. âAt that point,â Mr. Simpson said, âthey will realize that they spent four years in one noble cause, which was to defeat him. And they didnât.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The State of Union address will highlight just how much Mr. Obamaâs tactics have changed even if his basic policy goals have not. His promises to heal the rifts between red American and blue America have fallen flat, as Congressional Republicans have largely spurned him. So he is now trying to highlight his differences with Republicans in an effort to win a second term and new leverage.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Beyond election returns, pressures for potential compromise include the looming expiration of the &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/t/taxation/bush_tax_cuts/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about Bush Tax Cuts." class="meta-classifier"&gt;Bush tax cuts&lt;/a&gt;, which represent $3 trillion worth of tax increases touching nearly every American, and the $1.2 trillion in automatic budget cuts due next January after failure of a special Congressional deficit committee to reach agreement last year. Advisers say such a deal remains Mr. Obamaâs objective after November, once campaign weaponry falls silent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âHe hasnât moved away from that,â said Gene Sperling, director of the presidentâs National Economic Council. Whether Mr. Obama can ever achieve it, his view of how to keep alive the possibility of such a deal has unquestionably changed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Obama has managed dual strands in his political DNA since bursting onto the national stage at the 2004 &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/d/democratic_national_convention/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about Democratic National Convention" class="meta-org"&gt;Democratic National Convention&lt;/a&gt;. He is a liberal who embraces his partyâs objectives on health care, tax policy, regulation and an activist government.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;But as the son of a Kenyan father and a white mother from Kansas, he has also embodied aspirations for national unity. He has offered himself as a politician who can surmount polarization and change Washington.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The first two years of his presidency emphasized his ideology. Backed by strong Democratic majorities in Congress, he pushed through an economic &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/united_states_economy/economic_stimulus/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about economic stimulus." class="meta-classifier"&gt;stimulus package&lt;/a&gt;, an expansion of health insurance coverage and new regulations for Wall Street. Efforts to win over the most moderate Republicans typically failed â" but also proved unnecessary to some of his biggest goals.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;In 2011, Mr. Obama shifted toward more natural areas of cross-party cooperation. He hired a former Commerce Secretary and corporate executive, William M. Daley, as his chief of staff to repair relations with business leaders and cut deals with Republicans.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Obama had for years identified long-term deficit reduction as an objective alongside short-time economic recovery and included politically unpopular &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/medicare/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="Recent and archival health news about Medicare." class="meta-classifier"&gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; changes in health reform. But Democrats still made only minor progress in addressing the long-term deficit. The Republican triumphs in the 2010 midterm elections placed the issue unavoidably at the center of debate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The American public shares much of the skepticism of government at the heart of the &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/t/tea_party_movement/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about the Tea Party movement." class="meta-classifier"&gt;Tea Party movement&lt;/a&gt;. Yet the fervor of that movement has also created a political opportunity for Democrats, by cementing Republican opposition to significant tax increases in a deficit-reduction package.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Polls show the tax increases on affluent Americans that Mr. Obama has proposed enjoy broad public support. The large cuts to &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/social_security_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about Social Security." class="meta-classifier"&gt;Social Security&lt;/a&gt; and Medicare that leading Republicans favor â" far larger than those in Mr. Obamaâs health bill â" do not.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âIf you really look at the issue of fiscal restraint and deficit reduction, the president has been much more in the center,â said Steve Bell, a longtime budget adviser to leading Republicans including Pete Domenici, a former senator from New Mexico who co-led another bipartisan deficit group.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âRepublicans have left themselves open by their behavior,â Mr. Bell added. âThey are making his case.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The question is whether a feisty re-election battle with Republicans brings Mr. Obama closer to achieving his goal. In the new phase of his presidency that began last fall, after talks with Mr. Boehner broke down, Mr. Obamaâs style and tone shifted. He is confronting Republicans more aggressively on issues of tax fairness and &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/i/income/income_inequality/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about income inequality." class="meta-classifier"&gt;income inequality&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Combined with the disappointing economic recovery, his new tone may remind many voters that Mr. Obamaâs term has not lived up to his hopes, or theirs, on several major issues. Some moderate Democrats would prefer that he talk more about the deficit and remind people of its importance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âHe could use the bully pulpitâ to build public support for sweeping deficit reduction, said Alice M. Rivlin, a budget director in the Clinton administration who worked with Mr. Domenici on a recent deficit plan. Her conclusion from the presidentâs talk in recent months: âHe has decided not to.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Others say fighting Republicans publicly was Mr. Obamaâs only choice. âThe populist card and the opposition to a do-nothing Congress, really, are the only cards he had left in his hand,â said Robert D. Reischauer, who was director of the Congressional Budget Office in the early 1990s. Still, Mr. Reischauer predicted that Republican opposition to Mr. Obama would not change in a second term and that the most likely result would be âfour more years of gridlock.â&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-7498803613447492801?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/7498803613447492801/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/washington-memo-state-of-union-more.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/7498803613447492801'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/7498803613447492801'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/washington-memo-state-of-union-more.html' title='Washington Memo: State of the Union? More Like State of the Campaign'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-3392499451986270156</id><published>2012-01-24T20:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T20:00:04.282-08:00</updated><title type='text'>President Obama's StateÂ ofÂ theÂ UnionÂ Address #1</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id=""&gt; &lt;p&gt;Remarks of President Barack Obama â" As Prepared for Delivery&lt;br/&gt;State of the Union Address&lt;br/&gt;âAn America Built to Lastâ&lt;br/&gt;Tuesday, January 24th, 2012&lt;br/&gt;Washington, DC&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As Prepared for Delivery â"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq. Â Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought â" and several thousand gave their lives.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world. Â For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. Â For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country. Â Most of al Qaedaâs top lieutenants have been defeated. Â The Talibanâs momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;These achievements are a testament to the courage, selflessness, and teamwork of Americaâs Armed Forces. Â At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations. Â Theyâre not consumed with personal ambition. Â They donât obsess over their differences. Â They focus on the mission at hand. Â They work together.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example. Â Think about the America within our reach: Â A country that leads the world in educating its people. Â An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs. Â A future where weâre in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity arenât so tied to unstable parts of the world. Â An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We can do this. Â I know we can, because weâve done it before. Â At the end of World War II, when another generation of heroes returned home from combat, they built the strongest economy and middle class the world has ever known. Â My grandfather, a veteran of Pattonâs Army, got the chance to go to college on the GI Bill. Â My grandmother, who worked on a bomber assembly line, was part of a workforce that turned out the best products on Earth.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The two of them shared the optimism of a Nation that had triumphed over a depression and fascism. Â They understood they were part of something larger; that they were contributing to a story of success that every American had a chance to share â" the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive. Â No challenge is more urgent. Â No debate is more important. Â We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Â Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules. Â Whatâs at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values. Â We have to reclaim them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Letâs remember how we got here. Â Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores. Â  Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete. Â Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that werenât, and personal debt that kept piling up.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In 2008, the house of cards collapsed. Â We learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldnât afford or understand them. Â Banks had made huge bets and bonuses with other peopleâs money. Â Regulators had looked the other way, or didnât have the authority to stop the bad behavior.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;It was wrong. Â It was irresponsible. Â And it plunged our economy into a crisis that put millions out of work, saddled us with more debt, and left innocent, hard-working Americans holding the bag. Â In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs. Â And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Those are the facts. Â But so are these. Â In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs. Â Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005. Â American manufacturers are hiring again, creating jobs for the first time since the late 1990s. Â Together, weâve agreed to cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion. Â And weâve put in place new rules to hold Wall Street accountable, so a crisis like that never happens again.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The state of our Union is getting stronger. Â And weâve come too far to turn back now. Â As long as Iâm President, I will work with anyone in this chamber to build on this momentum. Â But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;No, we will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profits. Â Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy thatâs built to last â" an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This blueprint begins with American manufacturing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse. Â Some even said we should let it die. Â With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen. Â In exchange for help, we demanded responsibility. Â We got workers and automakers to settle their differences. Â We got the industry to retool and restructure. Â Today, General Motors is back on top as the worldâs number one automaker. Â Chrysler has grown faster in the U.S. than any major car company. Â Ford is investing billions in U.S. plants and factories. Â And together, the entire industry added nearly 160,000 jobs. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We bet on American workers. Â We bet on American ingenuity. Â And tonight, the American auto industry is back.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Whatâs happening in Detroit can happen in other industries. Â It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh. Â We canât bring back every job thatâs left our shores. Â But right now, itâs getting more expensive to do business in places like China. Â Meanwhile, America is more productive. Â A few weeks ago, the CEO of Master Lock told me that it now makes business sense for him to bring jobs back home. Â Today, for the first time in fifteen years, Master Lockâs unionized plant in Milwaukee is running at full capacity.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So we have a huge opportunity, at this moment, to bring manufacturing back. Â But we have to seize it. Â Tonight, my message to business leaders is simple: Â Ask yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We should start with our tax code. Â Right now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas. Â Meanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world. Â It makes no sense, and everyone knows it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So letâs change it. Â First, if youâre a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldnât get a tax deduction for doing it. Â That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Second, no American company should be able to avoid paying its fair share of taxes by moving jobs and profits overseas. Â From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax. Â And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Third, if youâre an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut. Â If youâre a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here. Â And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;My message is simple. Â Itâs time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America. Â Send me these tax reforms, and Iâll sign them right away. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Weâre also making it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world. Â Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years. Â With the bipartisan trade agreements I signed into law, we are on track to meet that goal â" ahead of schedule. Â Soon, there will be millions of new customers for American goods in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea. Â Soon, there will be new cars on the streets of Seoul imported from Detroit, and Toledo, and Chicago. Â  Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products. Â And I will not stand by when our competitors donât play by the rules. Â Weâve brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration â" and itâs made a difference. Â Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires. Â But we need to do more. Â Itâs not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated. Â Itâs not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because theyâre heavily subsidized.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Tonight, Iâm announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China. Â There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders. Â And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing finance or new markets like Russia. Â Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you â" America will always win.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I also hear from many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but canât find workers with the right skills. Â Growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job. Â Think about that â" openings at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thatâs inexcusable. Â And we know how to fix it. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jackie Bray is a single mom from North Carolina who was laid off from her job as a mechanic. Â Then Siemens opened a gas turbine factory in Charlotte, and formed a partnership with Central Piedmont Community College. Â The company helped the college design courses in laser and robotics training. Â It paid Jackieâs tuition, then hired her to help operate their plant.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I want every American looking for work to have the same opportunity as Jackie did. Â Join me in a national commitment to train two million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job. Â My Administration has already lined up more companies that want to help. Â Model partnerships between businesses like Siemens and community colleges in places like Charlotte, Orlando, and Louisville are up and running. Â  Now you need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers â" places that teach people skills that local businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need. Â Itâs time to turn our unemployment system into a reemployment system that puts people to work. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;These reforms will help people get jobs that are open today. Â But to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, our commitment to skills and education has to start earlier.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;For less than one percent of what our Nation spends on education each year, weâve convinced nearly every State in the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning â" the first time thatâs happened in a generation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But challenges remain. Â And we know how to solve them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;At a time when other countries are doubling down on education, tight budgets have forced States to lay off thousands of teachers. Â We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000. Â A great teacher can offer an escape from poverty to the child who dreams beyond his circumstance. Â  Every person in this chamber can point to a teacher who changed the trajectory of their lives. Â Most teachers work tirelessly, with modest pay, sometimes digging into their own pocket for school supplies â" just to make a difference.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Teachers matter. Â So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, letâs offer schools a deal. Â Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and reward the best ones. Â In return, grant schools flexibility: Â To teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just arenât helping kids learn.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We also know that when students arenât allowed to walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma. Â So tonight, I call on every State to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college. Â At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July. Â Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars. Â And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Of course, itâs not enough for us to increase student aid. Â We canât just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; weâll run out of money. Â States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets. Â And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down. Â Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents whoâve done just that. Â Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly. Â Some use better technology. Â The point is, itâs possible. Â So let me put colleges and universities on notice: Â If you canât stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down. Â Higher education canât be a luxury â" itâs an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Letâs also remember that hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: Â The fact that they arenât yet American citizens. Â Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation. Â Others came more recently, to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home to invent new products and create new jobs somewhere else.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That doesnât make sense. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration. Thatâs why my Administration has put more boots on the border than ever before. Â Thatâs why there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The opponents of action are out of excuses. Â We should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now. Â  But if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, letâs at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, and defend this country. Â Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship. Â I will sign it right away.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;You see, an economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country. Â That means women should earn equal pay for equal work. Â It means we should support everyone whoâs willing to work; and every risk-taker and entrepreneur who aspires to become the next Steve Jobs. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After all, innovation is what America has always been about. Â Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses. Â So letâs pass an agenda that helps them succeed. Â Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow. Â Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs. Â Both parties agree on these ideas. Â So put them in a bill, and get it on my desk this year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Innovation also demands basic research. Â Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally-financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched. Â New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet. Â Donât gut these investments in our budget. Â Donât let other countries win the race for the future. Â Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet; to new American jobs and new American industries. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy. Â Over the last three years, weâve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, Iâm directing my Administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Â Right now, American oil production is the highest that itâs been in eight years. Â Thatâs right â" eight years. Â Not only that â" last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But with only 2 percent of the worldâs oil reserves, oil isnât enough. Â This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy â" a strategy thatâs cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my Administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy. Â Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade. Â And Iâm requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use. Â America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we donât have to choose between our environment and our economy. Â And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of thirty years, that helped develop the technologies to extract all this natural gas out of shale rock â" reminding us that Government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground. Â  Â  Â  Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Whatâs true for natural gas is true for clean energy. Â In three years, our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the worldâs leading manufacturer of high-tech batteries. Â Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled. Â And thousands of Americans have jobs because of it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When Bryan Ritterby was laid off from his job making furniture, he said he worried that at 55, no one would give him a second chance. Â But he found work at Energetx, a wind turbine manufacturer in Michigan. Â Before the recession, the factory only made luxury yachts. Â Today, itâs hiring workers like Bryan, who said, âIâm proud to be working in the industry of the future.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Our experience with shale gas shows us that the payoffs on these public investments donât always come right away. Â Some technologies donât pan out; some companies fail. Â But I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy. Â I will not walk away from workers like Bryan. Â I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or Germany because we refuse to make the same commitment here. Â We have subsidized oil companies for a century. Â Thatâs long enough. Â Itâs time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry thatâs rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry thatâs never been more promising. Â  Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives. Â The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change. Â But thereâs no reason why Congress shouldnât at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation. Â So far, you havenât acted. Â Well tonight, I will. Â Iâm directing my Administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes. Â And Iâm proud to announce that the Department of Defense, the worldâs largest consumer of energy, will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history â" with the Navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Of course, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy. Â So hereâs another proposal: Â Help manufacturers eliminate energy waste in their factories and give businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings. Â Their energy bills will be $100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them. Â Send me a bill that creates these jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair Americaâs infrastructure. Â So much of America needs to be rebuilt. Â Weâve got crumbling roads and bridges. Â A power grid that wastes too much energy. Â An incomplete high-speed broadband network that prevents a small business owner in rural America from selling her products all over the world.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;During the Great Depression, America built the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge. Â After World War II, we connected our States with a system of highways. Â Democratic and Republican administrations invested in great projects that benefited everybody, from the workers who built them to the businesses that still use them today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the next few weeks, I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects. Â But you need to fund these projects. Â Take the money weâre no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thereâs never been a better time to build, especially since the construction industry was one of the hardest-hit when the housing bubble burst. Â Of course, construction workers werenât the only ones hurt. Â So were millions of innocent Americans whoâve seen their home values decline. Â And while Government canât fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldnât have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thatâs why Iâm sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. Â No more red tape. Â No more runaround from the banks. Â A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it wonât add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Letâs never forget: Â Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a Government and a financial system that do the same. Â Itâs time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: Â No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts. Â An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Weâve all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldnât afford them, and buyers who knew they couldnât afford them. Â Thatâs why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior. Â Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, donât destroy the free market. Â They make the free market work better. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There is no question that some regulations are outdated, unnecessary, or too costly. Â In fact, Iâve approved fewer regulations in the first three years of my presidency than my Republican predecessor did in his. Â Iâve ordered every federal agency to eliminate rules that donât make sense. Â Weâve already announced over 500 reforms, and just a fraction of them will save business and citizens more than $10 billion over the next five years. Â We got rid of one rule from 40 years ago that could have forced some dairy farmers to spend $10,000 a year proving that they could contain a spill â" because milk was somehow classified as an oil. Â With a rule like that, I guess it was worth crying over spilled milk. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Iâm confident a farmer can contain a milk spill without a federal agency looking over his shoulder. Â But I will not back down from making sure an oil company can contain the kind of oil spill we saw in the Gulf two years ago. Â I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury pollution, or making sure that our food is safe and our water is clean. Â I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules. Â The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial systemâs core purpose: Â Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, start a business, or send a kid to college.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So if youâre a big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to make risky bets with your customersâ deposits. Â Youâre required to write out a âliving willâ that details exactly how youâll pay the bills if you fail â" because the rest of us arenât bailing you out ever again. Â And if youâre a mortgage lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of signing people up for products they canât afford with confusing forms and deceptive practices are over. Â Today, American consumers finally have a watchdog in Richard Cordray with one job: To look out for them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect peopleâs investments. Â Some financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because thereâs no real penalty for being a repeat offender. Â Thatâs bad for consumers, and itâs bad for the vast majority of bankers and financial service professionals who do the right thing. Â So pass legislation that makes the penalties for fraud count.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy. Â But it should also guide us as we look to pay down our debt and invest in our future.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile. Â People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year. Â There are plenty of ways to get this done. Â So letâs agree right here, right now: Â No side issues. Â No drama. Â Pass the payroll tax cut without delay.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When it comes to the deficit, weâve already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings. Â But we need to do more, and that means making choices. Â Right now, weâre poised to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was supposed to be a temporary tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. Â Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households. Â Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans? Â Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else â" like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans? Â Because if weâre serious about paying down our debt, we canât do both. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The American people know what the right choice is. Â So do I. Â As I told the Speaker this summer, Iâm prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes. Â Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: Â If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes. Â And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right: Â Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires. Â In fact, if youâre earning a million dollars a year, you shouldnât get special tax subsidies or deductions. Â On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldnât go up. Â Youâre the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages. Â Youâre the ones who need relief. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Now, you can call this class warfare all you want. Â But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Â Most Americans would call that common sense.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We donât begrudge financial success in this country. Â We admire it. Â When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, itâs not because they envy the rich. Â Itâs because they understand that when I get tax breaks I donât need and the country canât afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference â" like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet. Â Thatâs not right. Â Americans know itâs not right. Â They know that this generationâs success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their countryâs future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility. Â Thatâs how weâll reduce our deficit. Â Thatâs an America built to last. Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I recognize that people watching tonight have differing views about taxes and debt; energy and health care. Â But no matter what party they belong to, I bet most Americans are thinking the same thing right now: Â Nothing will get done this year, or next year, or maybe even the year after that, because Washington is broken.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Can you blame them for feeling a little cynical?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The greatest blow to confidence in our economy last year didnât come from events beyond our control. Â It came from a debate in Washington over whether the United States would pay its bills or not. Â Who benefited from that fiasco? Â &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Iâve talked tonight about the deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street. Â But the divide between this city and the rest of the country is at least as bad â" and it seems to get worse every year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Some of this has to do with the corrosive influence of money in politics. Â So together, letâs take some steps to fix that. Â Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow. Â Letâs limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact. Â Letâs make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress canât lobby Congress, and vice versa â" an idea that has bipartisan support, at least outside of Washington.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Some of whatâs broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days. Â A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything â" even routine business â" passed through the Senate. Â Neither party has been blameless in these tactics. Â Now both parties should put an end to it. Â For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The executive branch also needs to change. Â Too often, itâs inefficient, outdated and remote. Â Thatâs why Iâve asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Finally, none of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town. Â We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction; that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Iâm a Democrat. Â But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed: Â That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more. Â Thatâs why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States. Â Thatâs why weâre getting rid of regulations that donât work. Â Thatâs why our health care law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;On the other hand, even my Republican friends who complain the most about Government spending have supported federally-financed roads, and clean energy projects, and federal offices for the folks back home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The point is, we should all want a smarter, more effective Government. Â And while we may not be able to bridge our biggest philosophical differences this year, we can make real progress. Â With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow. Â But I can do a whole lot more with your help. Â Because when we act together, there is nothing the United States of America canât achieve.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That is the lesson weâve learned from our actions abroad over the last few years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ending the Iraq war has allowed us to strike decisive blows against our enemies. Â From Pakistan to Yemen, the al Qaeda operatives who remain are scrambling, knowing that they canât escape the reach of the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;From this position of strength, weâve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Â Ten thousand of our troops have come home. Â Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer. This transition to Afghan lead will continue, and we will build an enduring partnership with Afghanistan, so that it is never again a source of attacks against America.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the Middle East and North Africa, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sanaâa to Tripoli. Â A year ago, Qadhafi was one of the worldâs longest-serving dictators â" a murderer with American blood on his hands. Â Today, he is gone. Â And in Syria, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change canât be reversed, and that human dignity canât be denied.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;How this incredible transformation will end remains uncertain. Â But we have a huge stake in the outcome. Â And while it is ultimately up to the people of the region to decide their fate, we will advocate for those values that have served our own country so well. Â We will stand against violence and intimidation. We will stand for the rights and dignity of all human beings â" men and women; Christians, Muslims, and Jews. Â We will support policies that lead to strong and stable democracies and open markets, because tyranny is no match for liberty.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And we will safeguard Americaâs own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests. Â Look at Iran. Â Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iranâs nuclear program now stands as one. Â The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent. Â Let there be no doubt: Â America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal. Â But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe. Â Our oldest alliances in Europe and Asia are stronger than ever. Â Our ties to the Americas are deeper. Â Our iron-clad commitment to Israelâs security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history. Â Weâve made it clear that America is a Pacific power, and a new beginning in Burma has lit a new hope. From the coalitions weâve built to secure nuclear materials, to the missions weâve led against hunger and disease; from the blows weâve dealt to our enemies; to the enduring power of our moral example, America is back.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesnât know what theyâre talking about. Â Thatâs not the message we get from leaders around the world, all of whom are eager to work with us. Â Thatâs not how people feel from Tokyo to Berlin; from Cape Town to Rio; where opinions of America are higher than theyâve been in years. Â Yes, the world is changing; no, we canât control every event. Â But America remains the one indispensable nation in world affairs â" and as long as Iâm President, I intend to keep it that way.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thatâs why, working with our military leaders, I have proposed a new defense strategy that ensures we maintain the finest military in the world, while saving nearly half a trillion dollars in our budget. Â To stay one step ahead of our adversaries, I have already sent this Congress legislation that will secure our country from the growing danger of cyber-threats.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Above all, our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it. Â As they come home, we must serve them as well as they served us. Â That includes giving them the care and benefits they have earned â" which is why weâve increased annual VA spending every year Iâve been President. Â And it means enlisting our veterans in the work of rebuilding our Nation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With the bipartisan support of this Congress, we are providing new tax credits to companies that hire vets. Â Michelle and Jill Biden have worked with American businesses to secure a pledge of 135,000 jobs for veterans and their families. Â And tonight, Iâm proposing a Veterans Job Corps that will help our communities hire veterans as cops and firefighters, so that America is as strong as those who defend her.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Which brings me back to where I began. Â Those of us whoâve been sent here to serve can learn from the service of our troops. Â When you put on that uniform, it doesnât matter if youâre black or white; Asian or Latino; conservative or liberal; rich or poor; gay or straight. Â When youâre marching into battle, you look out for the person next to you, or the mission fails. Â When youâre in the thick of the fight, you rise or fall as one unit, serving one Nation, leaving no one behind.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;One of my proudest possessions is the flag that the SEAL Team took with them on the mission to get bin Laden. Â On it are each of their names. Â Some may be Democrats. Â Some may be Republicans. Â But that doesnât matter. Â Just like it didnât matter that day in the Situation Room, when I sat next to Bob Gates â" a man who was George Bushâs defense secretary; and Hillary Clinton, a woman who ran against me for president.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;All that mattered that day was the mission. Â No one thought about politics. Â No one thought about themselves. Â One of the young men involved in the raid later told me that he didnât deserve credit for the mission. Â It only succeeded, he said, because every single member of that unit did their job â" the pilot who landed the helicopter that spun out of control; the translator who kept others from entering the compound; the troops who separated the women and children from the fight; the SEALs who charged up the stairs. Â More than that, the mission only succeeded because every member of that unit trusted each other â" because you canât charge up those stairs, into darkness and danger, unless you know that thereâs someone behind you, watching your back.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So it is with America. Â Each time I look at that flag, Iâm reminded that our destiny is stitched together like those fifty stars and those thirteen stripes. Â No one built this country on their own. Â This Nation is great because we built it together. Â This Nation is great because we worked as a team. Â This Nation is great because we get each otherâs backs. Â And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard. Â As long as weâre joined in common purpose, as long as we maintain our common resolve, our journey moves forward, our future is hopeful, and the state of our Union will always be strong.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;###&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-3392499451986270156?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/3392499451986270156/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/president-obamas-stateaofatheaunionaadd.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3392499451986270156'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3392499451986270156'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/president-obamas-stateaofatheaunionaadd.html' title='President Obama&apos;s StateÂ ofÂ theÂ UnionÂ Address #1'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-5925077702076246061</id><published>2012-01-24T19:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T19:30:04.794-08:00</updated><title type='text'>TRANSCRIPT: Obama's 2012 State of the Union</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The following is a transcript of President Obama's State of the Union address.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/iraq.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Iraq&lt;/a&gt;. Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought - and several thousand gave their lives.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/u.s.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;United States&lt;/a&gt; safer and more respected around the world. For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. For the first time in two decades, &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/iraq/osama-bin-laden.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Osama bin Laden&lt;/a&gt; is not a threat to this country. Most of al Qaeda's top lieutenants have been defeated. The Taliban's momentum has been broken, and some troops in &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/afghanistan.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Afghanistan&lt;/a&gt; have begun to come home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;These achievements are a testament to the courage, selflessness, and teamwork of America's Armed Forces. At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations. They're not consumed with personal ambition. They don't obsess over their differences. They focus on the mission at hand. They work together.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example. Think about the America within our reach: A country that leads the world in educating its people. An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs. A future where we're in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren't so tied to unstable parts of the world. An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We can do this. I know we can, because we've done it before. At the end of &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/world-war-ii.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;World War II&lt;/a&gt;, when another generation of heroes returned home from combat, they built the strongest economy and middle class the world has ever known. My grandfather, a veteran of Patton's Army, got the chance to go to college on the GI Bill. My grandmother, who worked on a bomber assembly line, was part of a workforce that turned out the best products on Earth.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The two of them shared the optimism of a Nation that had triumphed over a depression and fascism. They understood they were part of something larger; that they were contributing to a story of success that every American had a chance to share - the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive. No challenge is more urgent. No debate is more important. We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules. What's at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values. We have to reclaim them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Let's remember how we got here. Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores. Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete. Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that weren't, and personal debt that kept piling up.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In 2008, the house of cards collapsed. We learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldn't afford or understand them. Banks had made huge bets and bonuses with other people's money. Regulators had looked the other way, or didn't have the authority to stop the bad behavior.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;It was wrong. It was irresponsible. And it plunged our economy into a crisis that put millions out of work, saddled us with more debt, and left innocent, hard-working Americans holding the bag. In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs. And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Those are the facts. But so are these. In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs. Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005. American manufacturers are hiring again, creating jobs for the first time since the late 1990s. Together, we've agreed to cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion. And we've put in place new rules to hold Wall Street accountable, so a crisis like that never happens again.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The state of our Union is getting stronger. And we've come too far to turn back now. As long as I'm President, I will work with anyone in this chamber to build on this momentum. But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;No, we will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profits. Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy that's built to last - an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This blueprint begins with American manufacturing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse. Some even said we should let it die. With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen. In exchange for help, we demanded responsibility. We got workers and automakers to settle their differences. We got the industry to retool and restructure. Today, General Motors is back on top as the world's number one automaker. Chrysler has grown faster in the U.S. than any major car company. Ford is investing billions in U.S. plants and factories. And together, the entire industry added nearly 160,000 jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We bet on American workers. We bet on American ingenuity. And tonight, the American auto industry is back.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;What's happening in Detroit can happen in other industries. It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh. We can't bring back every job that's left our shores. But right now, it's getting more expensive to do business in places like &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/china.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;China&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, America is more productive. A few weeks ago, the CEO of Master Lock told me that it now makes business sense for him to bring jobs back home. Today, for the first time in fifteen years, Master Lock's unionized plant in Milwaukee is running at full capacity.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So we have a huge opportunity, at this moment, to bring manufacturing back. But we have to seize it. Tonight, my message to business leaders is simple: Ask yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We should start with our tax code. Right now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas. Meanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and everyone knows it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So let's change it. First, if you're a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldn't get a tax deduction for doing it. That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Second, no American company should be able to avoid paying its fair share of taxes by moving jobs and profits overseas. From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax. And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Third, if you're an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut. If you're a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here. And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;My message is simple. It's time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America. Send me these tax reforms, and I'll sign them right away.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We're also making it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world. Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years. With the bipartisan trade agreements I signed into law, we are on track to meet that goal - ahead of schedule. Soon, there will be millions of new customers for American goods in Panama, &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/colombia.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Colombia&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/south-korea.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;South Korea&lt;/a&gt;. Soon, there will be new cars on the streets of Seoul imported from Detroit, and Toledo, and &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/entertainment/music/broadway/chicago-the-musical.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Chicago&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products. And I will not stand by when our competitors don't play by the rules. We've brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration - and it's made a difference. Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires. But we need to do more. It's not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated. It's not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they're heavily subsidized.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Tonight, I'm announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China. There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders. And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing finance or new markets like &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/russia.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Russia&lt;/a&gt;. Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you - America will always win.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I also hear from many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but can't find workers with the right skills. Growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job. Think about that - openings at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That's inexcusable. And we know how to fix it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jackie Bray is a single mom from North Carolina who was laid off from her job as a mechanic. Then Siemens opened a gas turbine factory in Charlotte, and formed a partnership with Central Piedmont Community College. The company helped the college design courses in laser and robotics training. It paid Jackie's tuition, then hired her to help operate their plant.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I want every American looking for work to have the same opportunity as Jackie did. Join me in a national commitment to train two million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job. My Administration has already lined up more companies that want to help. Model partnerships between businesses like Siemens and community colleges in places like Charlotte, Orlando, and Louisville are up and running. Now you need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers - places that teach people skills that local businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need. It's time to turn our unemployment system into a reemployment system that puts people to work.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;These reforms will help people get jobs that are open today. But to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, our commitment to skills and education has to start earlier.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;For less than one percent of what our Nation spends on education each year, we've convinced nearly every State in the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning - the first time that's happened in a generation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But challenges remain. And we know how to solve them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;At a time when other countries are doubling down on education, tight budgets have forced States to lay off thousands of teachers. We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000. A great teacher can offer an escape from poverty to the child who dreams beyond his circumstance. Every person in this chamber can point to a teacher who changed the trajectory of their lives. Most teachers work tirelessly, with modest pay, sometimes digging into their own pocket for school supplies - just to make a difference.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Teachers matter. So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, let's offer schools a deal. Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and reward the best ones. In return, grant schools flexibility: To teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just aren't helping kids learn.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We also know that when students aren't allowed to walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma. So tonight, I call on every State to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college. At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July. Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars. And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Of course, it's not enough for us to increase student aid. We can't just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we'll run out of money. States also need to do their part, by making &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/college-education.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;higher education&lt;/a&gt; a higher priority in their budgets. And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down. Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who've done just that. Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly. Some use better technology. The point is, it's possible. So let me put colleges and universities on notice: If you can't stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down. Higher education can't be a luxury - it's an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Let's also remember that hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: The fact that they aren't yet American citizens. Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation. Others came more recently, to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home to invent new products and create new jobs somewhere else.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That doesn't make sense.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration. That's why my Administration has put more boots on the border than ever before. That's why there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The opponents of action are out of excuses. We should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now. But if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, let's at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, and defend this country. Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship. I will sign it right away.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;You see, an economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country. That means women should earn equal pay for equal work. It means we should support everyone who's willing to work; and every risk-taker and entrepreneur who aspires to become the next &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/technology/steve-jobs.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Steve Jobs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After all, innovation is what America has always been about. Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses. So let's pass an agenda that helps them succeed. Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow. Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs. Both parties agree on these ideas. So put them in a bill, and get it on my desk this year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Innovation also demands basic research. Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally-financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched. New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet. Don't gut these investments in our budget. Don't let other countries win the race for the future. Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet; to new American jobs and new American industries.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy. Over the last three years, we've opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, I'm directing my Administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Right now, American oil production is the highest that it's been in eight years. That's right - eight years. Not only that - last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But with only 2 percent of the world's oil reserves, oil isn't enough. This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy - a strategy that's cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my Administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy. Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade. And I'm requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use. America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we don't have to choose between our environment and our economy. And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of thirty years, that helped develop the technologies to extract all this natural gas out of shale rock - reminding us that Government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;What's true for natural gas is true for clean energy. In three years, our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the world's leading manufacturer of high-tech batteries. Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled. And thousands of Americans have jobs because of it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When Bryan Ritterby was laid off from his job making furniture, he said he worried that at 55, no one would give him a second chance. But he found work at Energetx, a wind turbine manufacturer in Michigan. Before the recession, the factory only made luxury yachts. Today, it's hiring workers like Bryan, who said, "I'm proud to be working in the industry of the future."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Our experience with shale gas shows us that the payoffs on these public investments don't always come right away. Some technologies don't pan out; some companies fail. But I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy. I will not walk away from workers like Bryan. I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/germany.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Germany&lt;/a&gt; because we refuse to make the same commitment here. We have subsidized oil companies for a century. That's long enough. It's time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that's rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that's never been more promising. Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives. The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change. But there's no reason why Congress shouldn't at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation. So far, you haven't acted. Well tonight, I will. I'm directing my Administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes. And I'm proud to announce that the Department of Defense, the world's largest consumer of energy, will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history - with the Navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Of course, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy. So here's another proposal: Help manufacturers eliminate energy waste in their factories and give businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings. Their energy bills will be $100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them. Send me a bill that creates these jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair America's infrastructure. So much of America needs to be rebuilt. We've got crumbling roads and bridges. A power grid that wastes too much energy. An incomplete high-speed broadband network that prevents a small business owner in rural America from selling her products all over the world.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;During the &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/economic-depression.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Great Depression&lt;/a&gt;, America built the &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/attractions/hoover-dam.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Hoover Dam&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/attractions/golden-gate-bridge.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Golden Gate Bridge&lt;/a&gt;. After World War II, we connected our States with a system of highways. Democratic and Republican administrations invested in great projects that benefited everybody, from the workers who built them to the businesses that still use them today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the next few weeks, I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects. But you need to fund these projects. Take the money we're no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There's never been a better time to build, especially since the construction industry was one of the hardest-hit when the housing bubble burst. Of course, construction workers weren't the only ones hurt. So were millions of innocent Americans who've seen their home values decline. And while Government can't fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldn't have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That's why I'm sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won't add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Let's never forget: Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a Government and a financial system that do the same. It's time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We've all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldn't afford them, and buyers who knew they couldn't afford them. That's why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior. Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/health/medicine/medical-devices.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;medical devices&lt;/a&gt;, don't destroy the free market. They make the free market work better.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There is no question that some regulations are outdated, unnecessary, or too costly. In fact, I've approved fewer regulations in the first three years of my presidency than my Republican predecessor did in his. I've ordered every federal agency to eliminate rules that don't make sense. We've already announced over 500 reforms, and just a fraction of them will save business and citizens more than $10 billion over the next five years. We got rid of one rule from 40 years ago that could have forced some dairy farmers to spend $10,000 a year proving that they could contain a spill - because milk was somehow classified as an oil. With a rule like that, I guess it was worth crying over spilled milk.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I'm confident a farmer can contain a milk spill without a federal agency looking over his shoulder. But I will not back down from making sure an oil company can contain the kind of oil spill we saw in the Gulf two years ago. I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury pollution, or making sure that our food is safe and our water is clean. I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules. The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial system's core purpose: Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, start a business, or send a kid to college.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So if you're a big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to make risky bets with your customers' deposits. You're required to write out a "living will" that details exactly how you'll pay the bills if you fail - because the rest of us aren't bailing you out ever again. And if you're a mortgage lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of signing people up for products they can't afford with confusing forms and deceptive practices are over. Today, American consumers finally have a watchdog in &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/obama-administration/richard-cordray.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Richard Cordray&lt;/a&gt; with one job: To look out for them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect people's investments. Some financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because there's no real penalty for being a repeat offender. That's bad for consumers, and it's bad for the vast majority of bankers and financial service professionals who do the right thing. So pass legislation that makes the penalties for fraud count.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy. But it should also guide us as we look to pay down our debt and invest in our future.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile. People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year. There are plenty of ways to get this done. So let's agree right here, right now: No side issues. No drama. Pass the payroll tax cut without delay.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When it comes to the deficit, we've already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings. But we need to do more, and that means making choices. Right now, we're poised to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was supposed to be a temporary tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households. Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans? Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else - like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans? Because if we're serious about paying down our debt, we can't do both.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The American people know what the right choice is. So do I. As I told the Speaker this summer, I'm prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/health/healthy-aging/medicare.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/funds-for-teachers-and-medicaid.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Medicaid&lt;/a&gt;, and strengthen &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/social-security.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Social Security&lt;/a&gt;, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes. Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes. And my Republican friend &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/tom-coburn.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Tom Coburn&lt;/a&gt; is right: Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires. In fact, if you're earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn't get special tax subsidies or deductions. On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn't go up. You're the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages. You're the ones who need relief.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Now, you can call this class warfare all you want. But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We don't begrudge financial success in this country. We admire it. When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it's not because they envy the rich. It's because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don't need and the country can't afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference - like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet. That's not right. Americans know it's not right. They know that this generation's success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their country's future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility. That's how we'll reduce our deficit. That's an America built to last.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I recognize that people watching tonight have differing views about taxes and debt; energy and health care. But no matter what party they belong to, I bet most Americans are thinking the same thing right now: Nothing will get done this year, or next year, or maybe even the year after that, because Washington is broken.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Can you blame them for feeling a little cynical?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The greatest blow to confidence in our economy last year didn't come from events beyond our control. It came from a debate in Washington over whether the United States would pay its bills or not. Who benefited from that fiasco?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I've talked tonight about the deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street. But the divide between this city and the rest of the country is at least as bad - and it seems to get worse every year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Some of this has to do with the corrosive influence of money in politics. So together, let's take some steps to fix that. Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow. Let's limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact. Let's make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can't lobby Congress, and vice versa - an idea that has bipartisan support, at least outside of Washington.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Some of what's broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days. A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything - even routine business - passed through the Senate. Neither party has been blameless in these tactics. Now both parties should put an end to it. For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The executive branch also needs to change. Too often, it's inefficient, outdated and remote. That's why I've asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Finally, none of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town. We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction; that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I'm a Democrat. But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed: That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more. That's why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States. That's why we're getting rid of regulations that don't work. That's why our health care law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;On the other hand, even my Republican friends who complain the most about Government spending have supported federally-financed roads, and clean energy projects, and federal offices for the folks back home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The point is, we should all want a smarter, more effective Government. And while we may not be able to bridge our biggest philosophical differences this year, we can make real progress. With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow. But I can do a whole lot more with your help. Because when we act together, there is nothing the United States of America can't achieve.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That is the lesson we've learned from our actions abroad over the last few years.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ending the &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/iraq/iraq-war.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Iraq war&lt;/a&gt; has allowed us to strike decisive blows against our enemies. From &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/pakistan.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Pakistan&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/yemen.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Yemen&lt;/a&gt;, the al Qaeda operatives who remain are scrambling, knowing that they can't escape the reach of the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;From this position of strength, we've begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Ten thousand of our troops have come home. Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer. This transition to Afghan lead will continue, and we will build an enduring partnership with Afghanistan, so that it is never again a source of attacks against America.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/middle-east.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Middle East&lt;/a&gt; and North &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/africa.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Africa&lt;/a&gt;, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sana'a to Tripoli. A year ago, Qadhafi was one of the world's longest-serving dictators - a murderer with American blood on his hands. Today, he is gone. And in &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/syria.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Syria&lt;/a&gt;, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change can't be reversed, and that human dignity can't be denied.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;How this incredible transformation will end remains uncertain. But we have a huge stake in the outcome. And while it is ultimately up to the people of the region to decide their fate, we will advocate for those values that have served our own country so well. We will stand against violence and intimidation. We will stand for the rights and dignity of all human beings - men and women; Christians, Muslims, and Jews. We will support policies that lead to strong and stable democracies and open markets, because tyranny is no match for liberty.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And we will safeguard America's own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests. Look at &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/iran.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Iran&lt;/a&gt;. Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iran's nuclear program now stands as one. The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent. Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal. But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe. Our oldest alliances in Europe and Asia are stronger than ever. Our ties to the Americas are deeper. Our iron-clad commitment to Israel's security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history. We've made it clear that America is a Pacific power, and a new beginning in Burma has lit a new hope. From the coalitions we've built to secure nuclear materials, to the missions we've led against hunger and disease; from the blows we've dealt to our enemies; to the enduring power of our moral example, America is back.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn't know what they're talking about. That's not the message we get from leaders around the world, all of whom are eager to work with us. That's not how people feel from Tokyo to Berlin; from Cape Town to Rio; where opinions of America are higher than they've been in years. Yes, the world is changing; no, we can't control every event. But America remains the one indispensable nation in world affairs - and as long as I'm President, I intend to keep it that way.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That's why, working with our military leaders, I have proposed a new defense strategy that ensures we maintain the finest military in the world, while saving nearly half a trillion dollars in our budget. To stay one step ahead of our adversaries, I have already sent this Congress legislation that will secure our country from the growing danger of cyber-threats.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Above all, our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it. As they come home, we must serve them as well as they served us. That includes giving them the care and benefits they have earned - which is why we've increased annual VA spending every year I've been President. And it means enlisting our veterans in the work of rebuilding our Nation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With the bipartisan support of this Congress, we are providing new tax credits to companies that hire vets. Michelle and &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/obama-administration/jill-biden.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Jill Biden&lt;/a&gt; have worked with American businesses to secure a pledge of 135,000 jobs for veterans and their families. And tonight, I'm proposing a Veterans Job Corps that will help our communities hire veterans as cops and firefighters, so that America is as strong as those who defend her.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Which brings me back to where I began. Those of us who've been sent here to serve can learn from the service of our troops. When you put on that uniform, it doesn't matter if you're black or white; Asian or Latino; conservative or liberal; rich or poor; gay or straight. When you're marching into battle, you look out for the person next to you, or the mission fails. When you're in the thick of the fight, you rise or fall as one unit, serving one Nation, leaving no one behind.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;One of my proudest possessions is the flag that the SEAL Team took with them on the mission to get bin Laden. On it are each of their names. Some may be Democrats. Some may be Republicans. But that doesn't matter. Just like it didn't matter that day in the Situation Room, when I sat next to Bob Gates - a man who was George Bush's defense secretary; and &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/obama-administration/hillary-clinton.htm#r_src=ramp" class="r_lapi"&gt;Hillary Clinton&lt;/a&gt;, a woman who ran against me for president.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;All that mattered that day was the mission. No one thought about politics. No one thought about themselves. One of the young men involved in the raid later told me that he didn't deserve credit for the mission. It only succeeded, he said, because every single member of that unit did their job - the pilot who landed the helicopter that spun out of control; the translator who kept others from entering the compound; the troops who separated the women and children from the fight; the SEALs who charged up the stairs. More than that, the mission only succeeded because every member of that unit trusted each other - because you can't charge up those stairs, into darkness and danger, unless you know that there's someone behind you, watching your back.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So it is with America. Each time I look at that flag, I'm reminded that our destiny is stitched together like those fifty stars and those thirteen stripes. No one built this country on their own. This Nation is great because we built it together. This Nation is great because we worked as a team. This Nation is great because we get each other's backs. And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard. As long as we're joined in common purpose, as long as we maintain our common resolve, our journey moves forward, our future is hopeful, and the state of our Union will always be strong.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-5925077702076246061?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/5925077702076246061/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/transcript-obamas-2012-state-of-union.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5925077702076246061'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5925077702076246061'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/transcript-obamas-2012-state-of-union.html' title='TRANSCRIPT: Obama&apos;s 2012 State of the Union'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-121188693945513492</id><published>2012-01-24T19:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T19:00:03.309-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The GOPâs unemployment trap</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="fold-12224391" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;With all that in mind, we face an astonishing political reality: The Republican presidential nomination battle has moved into Florida, a state still suffering the pain of an unemployment rate over 10 percent, and weâre hearing more from Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney about each otherâs personal failings than we are about what they are going to do to fight the scourge of unemployment.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Oh sure, thereâs no end of talk about how President Obamaâs policies are responsible for everything that is wrong with the American economy. Weâre also hearing a lot about the (bogus) theory that extending unemployment insurance benefits makes Americans too fat and lazy to get off the couch and look for a job. And thereâs the occasional rhetorical gesture: At the end of his concession speech in South Carolina, Mitt Romney pledged that âI will get America back to work, and Iâll make sure that we remain the shining city on the hill.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Itâs certainly possible that the necessity for mano-a-mano combat between Romney and Gingrich has forced the two candidates to shelve their critique of Obamaâs handling of the economy for the time being while they busy themselves going for each otherâs throat. But thereâs another reason why we arenât hearing much about the unemployment crisis on the campaign trail: None of the Republican presidential candidates have anything new to say on the topic that we havenât already heard from the GOP, ad infinitum, ad nauseam, for the last 30 years. Their proposed strategy hasnât changed an iota since Ronald Reagan ran for president: Itâs still all about cutting taxes and slashing regulations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And thereâs a big problem with that. Because whether or not you believe that the current unemployment problem is &lt;em&gt;cyclical&lt;/em&gt; â" that is, part of the normal ups and down of the business cycle â" or &lt;em&gt;structural&lt;/em&gt; â" a more or less permanent response to a profoundly changing economy â" the Republican platform is toothless. On the one hand, itâs hard to combat a cyclical problem with the same policy proposals that one puts in place in good times or bad, and on the other, itâs arguable that the structural problems in the U.S. economy are, at least in part, a consequence of decades of low taxes and deregulatory philosophy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A tour of the GOP candidatesâ websites is revealing. &lt;a href="http://www.ronpaul2012.com/"&gt;Ron Paulâs website&lt;/a&gt; doesnât even mention either âjobsâ or âunemploymentâ under the category of âissues.â The closest he gets is advocating the passage of more anti-union âright to workâ laws. Rick Santorumâs &lt;a href="https://www.ricksantorum.com/issues"&gt;Where I Stand&lt;/a&gt; page tells us that he believes in American âExceptionalism,â is a âChampion of Faith and Familiesâ and makes clear that he really, &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; opposes gay marriage; but it has no section devoted to either jobs or unemployment. &lt;a href="http://www.newt.org/solutions/jobs-economy"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt; does manage to include a page on âJobs and the Economyâ but somehow canât bring himself to utter the word âunemployment.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;To his credit, Mitt Romney is the only Republican candidate whose website includes &lt;a href="http://mittromney.com/sites/default/files/shared/BelieveInAmerica-PlanForJobsAndEconomicGrowth-Full.pdf"&gt;a comprehensive (87-page!) plan announcing his economic agenda.&lt;/a&gt; If youâre looking for a full-throated lambasting of Obamaâs management of the economy, along with complaints about high unemployment, thatâs where youâll find it, a fact that, at first glance, would seem to make Romney a little more suited for electoral success than his current poll numbers would indicate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But a closer look at Romneyâs plan â" or Gingrichâs, for that matter â" reveals why neither he nor his fellow GOP pretenders to the White House throne are making a bigger deal of the plight of the jobless. They just donât have anything fresh to say.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romneyâs prescription for an economy that isnât producing enough jobs is to reduce taxes on savings and investment, eliminate the âdeathâ tax, and cut corporate taxes. As for regulatory policy, for starters, he promises to repeal âObamacareâ and Dodd-Frank, as well as âreview and eliminateâ all other Obama-era regulations. But this agenda doesnât separate him from his fellow GOP presidential candidates. He just spells out the party line in greater detail. If anything, Gingrich and Paul are further to the right â" advocating even more extreme tax cuts and greater swaths of regulatory slash-and-burning.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So what does this mean for unemployment?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;For the last few years, economists â" left, right and middle â" have been arguing heatedly about the nature of the current crisis. As noted above, there are two main competing theories â" the spike in unemployment is either cyclical or structural.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Cyclical unemployment presumes that the key problem in the economy is a lack of demand. With no consumer appetite for goods or services, companies have to lay off workers. Consequently, there are more people looking for jobs than jobs available.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Structural employment speaks to a mismatch between the jobs that are available and the skills of workers who need jobs. If manufacturing moves to China, then the U.S. suddenly has a great many manufacturing workers who are ill-suited to fill the openings in the booming healthcare sector.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There are different policy options available depending upon what you think the nature of the employment crisis is. If the problem is cyclical, the answer, at least from a Keynesian liberal point of view, is stimulus. Government spending works to counteract the downturn in the business cycle, either by creating jobs directly (infrastructure spending, assistance to state and local governments) or by putting money in peopleâs pocket â" food stamps, unemployment benefits, et cetera. More money creates more demand, resulting in more jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If the problem is structural, the challenge is bigger. Government needs to aggressively retrain workers, or engage in industrial policy that targets strategic sectors, or tinker with trade policy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Some liberal economists, led by Paul Krugman, are convinced that our current crisis is mostly cyclical. They point to the fact that nearly every job sector suffered huge losses in the recession (if the problem was structural, youâd see an uneven distribution of job losses) and to the huge mismatch between the number of job openings and the number of workers seeking jobs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But it doesnât have to be either/or. We could be working our way through the worst of both worlds â" a situation in which a massive cyclical downturn exacerbates the negative effects of structural changes decades in the making. We know that the dual forces of globalization and technological progress have treated the American middle class harshly. If a machine or a Chinese laborer can do the job â" itâs gone.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In an insightful piece in the National Journal last November, &lt;a href="http://nationaljournal.com/magazine/america-s-left-behinds-the-long-term-unemployed-20111117"&gt;Michael Hirsh&lt;/a&gt; made a provocative case that there has been a steady rise in long-term unemployment over the last 30 years that transcends the recession-recovery cycle. He argues that we attribute this in part to the supremacy of free-market policies that have exacerbated income inequality, weakened the safety net, and ended up making American workers more vulnerable in a competitive world.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If thatâs true, where does that leave the Republican candidates? We already know that theyâre completely averse to counter-cyclical government spending, and indeed, their opposition to any kind of tax increases has effectively crippled the federal governmentâs ability to act in a robust, fiscally prudent manner when the economy hits a downturn. But if the problem is structural, then their low tax, deregulatory agenda just continues us down the same path weâre already on. It leaves us even more defenseless against a changing world. Weâre already enjoying historically low levels of taxation. Weâve already loosened up the rules restricting Wall Streetâs freedom. And look where thatâs got us!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The vast majority of the job losses contributing to todayâs high unemployment came before a single Obama policy took effect. The architects of the world that delivered us the Great Recession believed exactly what the current crop of Republican presidential candidates are advocating. If I was them, Iâd be keeping my lips zipped too.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-121188693945513492?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/121188693945513492/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/gopas-unemployment-trap.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/121188693945513492'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/121188693945513492'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/gopas-unemployment-trap.html' title='The GOPâs unemployment trap'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-348390745444277190</id><published>2012-01-24T18:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T18:30:06.338-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The billionaire behind Newt</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="fold-12223151" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;How can otherwise sane people believe such lunacy? Â The answer is that members of the right-wing counterculture are brainwashed â" that is the only appropriate term â" by Â the apocalyptic propaganda ground out constantly by the conservative media establishment.Â A perfect example is a recent essay by Philip Klein, a senior editorial writer of the Washington Examiner, the right-wing newspaper owned by the billionaire Philip Anshutz: Â &lt;a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/welfare-state-destroying-america/331016"&gt;âThe Welfare State Is Destroying America.â&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Klein begins, typically, with the fall from grace of America under the sinister Franklin Roosevelt, who presided over the establishment of Social Security: âBut Roosevelt was dead wrong that the program would help the nation avoid deep debt. Â Social Security and the entitlement programs that followed its legacy of seeking to protect citizens from the âhazards and vicissitudes of life,â turned out to be fiscal disasters.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the real world, of course, todayâs national debt has nothing to do with Social Security, whose trust fund has a surplus that will last for decades, with the precise date of the trust fundâs exhaustion depending on the rate of general economic growth. True, the federal government has to raise the tax revenue to repay the money it borrowed from the trust fund â" but then, the federal government has to repay all of its creditors, domestic and foreign. Â Whatâs wrong with that?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As if to concede that there is no Social Security crisis in the near future, Klein engages in three intellectually dishonest maneuvers typical of right-wing propagandists. First, he talks about medium-term and long-term problems as though they were present-day emergencies.Â Second, he blurs the distinction between Social Securityâs long-term fiscal challenges, which are minor, and those caused by rising healthcare costs, in order to make Social Security seem worse off than it is in reality. Third, he implies that âthe growing debt burdenâ of the United States is primarily caused by Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, ignoring tax cuts, wars and the effects of a near-depression:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;With health care costs rising and the population aging, Americaâs welfare-state obligations are bringing the country to its financial knees. If left unchecked, the growing debt burden will not only trigger runaway inflation and stifling taxes, but it will also threaten national security.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;By now readers of the Washington Examiner must assume that Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson deliberately designed Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to be paid for by federal borrowing. Â Why shouldnât Kleinâs audience leap to that false conclusion? Â After all, Klein has not mentioned the funding streams that pay for these programs: Â payroll taxes (Social Security), payroll taxes and general revenues (Medicare) and general revenues (Medicaid).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If Klein were honest with his readers, he would point out that the main causes of federal deficits in the last generation have been the Reagan and Bush tax cuts, plus the fiscal aftereffects of the Great Recession, in the form of falling tax revenues and increased spending on unemployment insurance and stimulus programs. Â But that would distract from the false impression that Klein is seeking to convey.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So far in this classic of polemical literature, âThe Welfare State Is Destroying America,â Philip Klein has relied solely on rhetoric. Â In the next few paragraphs he uses a few numbers, all of which have been cherry-picked to paint a picture of imminent national economic collapse, and all of which are misleading.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Here is misleading argument No. 1:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Spending on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Obamacare alone currently account for 46 percent â" or nearly half of â" federal spending, excluding interest payments. Over the next 25 years, that percentage will explode to 66 percent, or close to two-thirds, according to the Congressional Budget Office.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ooh, scary! Â These numbers may frighten readers, but they are meaningless. The only number that conceivably would matter would be the overall federal-state-local spending as a share of GDP, which in the U.S. is well below the average for industrial democracies that are just as competitive and prosperous. Saying that the share of federal spending that is devoted to Social Security and healthcare spending will grow over 25 years from 46 to 66 percent does not support Kleinâs case that the welfare state will âdestroyâ America. These are just irrelevant numbers, thrown out to impress the ignorant reader of the Washington Examiner.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Misleading argument No. 2 follows:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Numbers associated with the nationâs debt crisis are almost too staggering to comprehend. Last month, total U.S. debt surpassed $15 trillion. But a recent analysis by Boston University economics professor Laurence Kotlikoff found that when long-term entitlement obligations are considered, the true fiscal gap is $211 trillion.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;What Klein fails to point out is that Kotlikoffâs calculation for unfunded entitlement obligations is for the period between now and infinity. Even if Kotlikoff and Klein used the briefer time span of, say, 2012-2100, there would be no cause for alarm, because nobody is going to present the federal government with a check for advance payment of all projected entitlement payments in the remainder of the 21st century, due tomorrow. Â In other words, saying the U.S. has a âfiscal gapâ is like saying that you are in danger of bankruptcy from a âpersonal fiscal gap,â because you could not pay off the entire house or car mortgage today. As long as you can make the installment payments at a reasonable interest rate, you, like the nation, are fine.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The abstract âfiscal gapâ arises almost entirely from the minor projected shortfall of payroll tax funding for Social Security and, more important, from the estimated out-of-control growth of healthcare costs in decades to come. Â Change the variables, by means of new taxes for Social Security, benefit cuts or control of excessive costs in the U.S. medical industry, and the Big Scary Fiscal Gap disappears or shrinks dramatically, depriving right-wing hacks and left-wing deficit hawks of a club used to beat Social Security and Medicare.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Does Klein tell his readers this? Of course not. Â Heâs just throwing out scary-sounding statistics to stampede the yahoos.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;On to misleading argument No. 3:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Greece, with an economy 1/50th the size of the U.S., is threatening the economic standing of the rest of Europe because of its growing debt burden, which hit 143 percent of its gross domestic product in 2010.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The U.S. is on pace to match that dubious distinction in under 20 years, according to the CBO, and to soar to 716 percent by 2080. Sustaining such debt would require raising marginal tax rates to as high as 88 percent, the CBO has told The Washington Examiner.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Shame on the CBO for misleading the public in this way. The experts of the CBO know perfectly well that the United States is never going to have a national debt of 716 percent of GDP or marginal tax rates of 88 percent. Â Long before anything like these absurd numbers were reached, policies would be changed to cut costs in medical spending. Long-term projections like these are just scary stories told to frighten the public into fiscal sobriety, in the same spirit that a parent would tell an overweight child that if she or he kept eating, then according to a straight-line computer projection, by the age of 40 she or he would weigh 23 tons.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As it happens, the CBOâs own rigorous work undercuts the apocalyptic narrative set forth by conservatives like Philip Klein. Â Here, from a &lt;a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/maintext.3.1.shtml"&gt;CBO report&lt;/a&gt; of a few years back (the long-term projections have not significantly changed), Â is Box 2, âThe Effect of the Aging of the Population on Spending on Medicare and Medicaid.â&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/Box2_Figure.gif" alt="" width="460" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This one graph disproves practically everything American conservatives say about the alleged unaffordability of entitlements. Note that the aging of the American population alone would only raise the share of GDP spent on Medicare and Medicaid slightly between now and 2082. Â The projected increase is almost entirely the result of excess cost growth in Americaâs dysfunctional medical-industrial sector and has next to nothing to do with aging. Now look at Figure 4, âProjected Spending on Health Care as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product.â&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/Figure4.gif" alt="" width="460" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Observe that the cancerous growth of healthcare costs occurs chiefly in private sector healthcare spending â" not in Medicare and Medicaid. Â In other words, the cost problem is one of the entire U.S. medical industry, private and public alike. Â It is not a problem caused by âentitlements.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Debating the solutions would take us too far from the subject, although it should be noted that most other countries control healthcare costs by means of âall-payer regulationâ â" that is, government-imposed price controls â" not by means of market competition, the rightâs unrealistic panacea, which no other nation uses, for the reason that simple market economics does not work in the healthcare sector.Â  For the purposes of this discussion, it is sufficient to reproduce a final chart from the CBO report, Figure 5, âFederal Spending for Medicare and Medicaid as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product Under Different Assumptions About Excess Cost Growth.â&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/Figure5.gif" alt="" width="460" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Note that if the excess cost growth problem is solved, then the nightmare scenario never materializes, either in the near future or the distant future. Â Indeed, in the last few years, partly because of the loss of employer-based healthcare by the unemployed, and partly because of reforms in medical provision, healthcare cost growth in the U.S. has slowed. Â If that trend continues, then conservatives will no longer be able to claim that healthcare in general (not just Medicare and Medicaid) will eat up half the economy in 2082. Â The right will have to use other arguments to discredit Social Security and Medicare, like the hoary old claim that these programs are fascist or communist â" an argument that has never persuaded the growing number of American voters who depend on Social Security and Medicare for their retirements and for protecting their physical health.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Philip Klein concludes his Op-Ed about how the welfare state is destroying America with further nonsense (you canât claim he isnât consistent). Â Reciting yet another right-wing myth, Klein asserts that because of Social Security and Medicare, the bond markets in general and the Chinese government in particular will stop lending America money and interest rates will skyrocket, destroying the American economy, yadda yadda yadda:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Just this past August, Standard and Poorâs downgraded U.S. debt for the first time in American history. Once bond holders abandon America, the nation will either have to dramatically cut spending, raise taxes steeply, or print money to buy up the debt â" which would trigger massive inflation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Where has he been since last August? Â Even a senior editorial writer at the Washington Examiner should be aware that the downgrading of Americaâs credit rating was followed by a rush of money into American bonds, not out of them, in defiance of the predictions of the deficit hawks. Evidently the bond markets think America is the worldâs safe haven and are not terribly worried about long-term American entitlement costs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The growing debt burden is also a national security risk, because it reduces Americaâs leverage against nations such as China, which owns a substantial amount of U.S. debt. And the fiscal crunch will force devastating cuts to our military â" far beyond anything contemplated today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Somebody should tell Klein that Chinaâs export-oriented growth model depends on keeping its currency undervalued and accumulating dollars, which it then uses to buy dollar-denominated debt like U.S. Treasury bonds. Â If China revalued its currency, it would stop buying bonds to the detriment of its industries and to the benefit of many American exporters. Â If this were to happen, the U.S. deficit would shrink and we would need less external financing. Â Hurrah! In the long run there doubtless will be increases in U.S. interest rates, but they are unlikely to come about for the reasons that Klein and other apocalyptics on the right predict.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As for the Pentagon, the chief threat to the future of the U.S. military is neither the American welfare state nor the Chinese financial authorities, but the conservative wing of the Republican Party, which prefers round after round of tax cuts for the rich to the taxes that would permit the U.S. to fund both an adequate military and an affordable welfare state.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Klein concludes inescapably:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thus, the conclusion is inescapable that, if America doesnât end the welfare state as we have known it since 1935, it will end America as we know it today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;It may seem cruel to pick on Philip Klein, who is, after all, simply one of many minor hacks in the right-wing media machine controlled by billionaires like Anshutz and the Koch brothers. Â But it is worth reading the rightâs propaganda now and then, just to find out how it is that so many of our conservative fellow citizens can have been so deceived.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-348390745444277190?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/348390745444277190/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/billionaire-behind-newt.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/348390745444277190'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/348390745444277190'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/billionaire-behind-newt.html' title='The billionaire behind Newt'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-1511524824954804209</id><published>2012-01-24T18:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T18:00:04.225-08:00</updated><title type='text'>America, arms-dealer to the world</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="fold-12166441" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/accordion-family-katherine-s-newman/1101893339?ean=9780807007433&amp;amp;itm=1&amp;amp;usri=the+accordion+family"&gt;âThe Accordion Family,â&lt;/a&gt; Katherine Newman, a sociologist and dean of the school of arts and sciences at Johns Hopkins University, looks at the dynamics of the boomerang generation â" a phenomenon she has dubbed the âaccordion family.â Part economic analysis, part ethnography, Newman interviews hundreds of individuals in six different countries (in southern Europe, the Nordic states, Japan and the U.S.), to better understand the international dynamics at work. The major reasons driving adult children back to the nest are economic, she finds: Globalization and the recession are making it harder for new workers to enter the labor force, and the cost of housing is climbing. But other social and psychological factors are at play too. The result is a sometimes rocky, sometimes serendipitous experience for these families as they struggle to redefine adulthood and familial roles in the face of overwhelming global economic forces.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Salon spoke with Newman over the phone about the growing difficulty for young people to find work, how new the idea of being an independent young adult really is, and the surprising emotional benefits of the accordion family.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is this current generation a bunch of lazy loafers? Your research doesnât seem to indicate this.Â &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;No. They are a generation that has been caught by a series of unfortunate, overlapping trends that put them at a disadvantage for becoming independent the way their parents did. Theyâre entering a very unfriendly labor market that is particularly punishing to young workers. With the housing implosion in the United States, theyâre still entering a housing system in which owner-occupied housing is very expensive. So, they have lower wages, if they have wages at all; they have high housing cost; and, in the advanced countries, there are ever more demanding credential races to qualify for professional employment. If theyâre aspiring to be middle- or upper-middle class, the length of time it takes to pile up the education you need to qualify for the jobs to make that possible is getting longer and longer and more and more expensive. When you put all those things together, itâs not all that surprising that the accordion family has developed the way it has. Itâs just a bunch of really bad circumstances that have coincided and affected this generation in ways that have not been the case before.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Money is (maybe obviously) a major reason for this trend. How so?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The recession weâre in has intensified a bunch of trends that were already gathering force, and already pushing people into accordion families. Those trends included a real downdraft in the capacity of young workers to find their way. That has really spread as downsizing has gathered force, as jobs have been outsourced. Itâs become a much more competitive labor market, and an employer can be incredibly choosy. That leaves young workers at a disadvantage. And as much as they have a hard time qualifying for those jobs, the jobs themselves have increasingly become short-term, part-time or unpaid altogether. Now, to become a qualified professional, many middle-class American kids are going to have to spend many years in completely unpaid internships. So they finish college, or in the course of going to college, they spend years upon years working in jobs that used to pay money and donât anymore because this market is so crowded. Well, if youâre going to spend years interning somewhere so that you get the kind of experience that will cause an employer to look at you seriously when thereâs a paid position, how in the world are you going to manage if you have no income? Youâve got to live someplace. So, in households that can afford it, parents are making it possible for their kids to gather those credentials that will allow them someday â" they hope â" to launch at the level theyâre expecting.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is this phenomenon the same for lower classes or are there different reasons driving the accordion family trend in these rungs of society?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In poorer households, these accordion families have always been there. Thereâs nothing new there, because lower-income people have had to pool their incomes for generations, because to keep the household afloat you had to have everybody working and everybody contributing â" and by the way, that was true for many middle-class households before the Second World War.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So this period of time which we come to see as normal â" of young people leaving home; and spending time on their own before they marry; and their parents having an empty nest â" thatâs a phenomenon of the post-Second World War period of great affluence. It created a huge boom in wages, and burgeoning opportunities in the white-collar world. Weâre not there anymore and we might not be again. We think of it as normal â" and I think this is an important point â" because the generations that experienced that ânormalâ are so huge. They dominate the social scene. Theyâre the baby-boom generation. That was their normal, but it wasnât normal before them and it may not be after them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So is this negative impression we have of boomerang children due to fickle memory?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;What people think about, what they regard as normal, what they factor in as explanation for how they got where they are really differs from one country to another. In the United States, I came to find that people forget these huge investments that were made by the whole society in the form of, for example, the GI Bill, which really made a difference in the trajectory of those generations. It allowed them to become homeowners; it allowed them to get a college education â" the first in their families ever to do so. They wouldnât have been able to do either of those things if it were not for huge investments that we made, through government, in their well-being. Now, of course, this was seen as a tribute to soldiers â" and it was, of course. But when you interview people [of that generation] and ask them, âHow did you manage to become a homeowner?â they almost never mention the GI Bill. Itâs not that they would deny it if you asked them, but if you just ask them, âWell, how did this happen?â the account is very much one of: âWell, I worked hard. I saved my money. I didnât go out to eat. I had very modest tastes. The problem with the next generation is that theyâre spending money freely and they have expectations that are too high, and theyâre not as disciplined.â Itâs all down to the personality of the generation rather than these huge economic structures that really do play a powerful role in determining where any individual or family ends up.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The same thing is true when you look at other countries. The Japanese, for example, tend to be very much like Americans: they think every person is the master of his own destiny. So if his destiny is not working out, then he really is to be despised. [These individuals] are the object of disdain. The Japanese tend to look at that next generation thatâs living at home and say, âWell, theyâre really lazy,â or, âTheyâve lost their way,â or, âThey donât know how to be men like their fathers were,â and, âTheyâre a defective generation.â But you never hear the Spaniards say that because they have a different history and a different political culture, and they are looking for the ways in which government, or big business, or whatever, is to blame because they see themselves as recipients of those forces.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So these cultures, they subtract and they add pieces of their histories very differently, [even though] theyâre all suffering from the same economic pressures.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is there a place that youâve studied where the self-perspective is healthier or more accurate?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When I started the project, I thought that Americans were sort of unrealistic in the way they thought about things, but when I started looking at these other countries, I decided maybe that wasnât the case. Thatâs because now I can see the extremes on either side more easily. I can see how hysterical the Japanese are about [the accordion family trend]; and I can see how comfortable the Italians are with this, and how they donât think itâs a problem.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So the United States turns out to be the moderate middle. There are some structural reasons why that is the case. We do have some housing thatâs cheap â" not homeownership, but we have dormitories on college campuses, we have rental housing that people can share with roommates. Youâd think that thatâs the way the whole world is organized, but itâs not true. In Spain, in Italy, there are no dormitories, thereâs very little rental housing. In Japan thereâs almost no rental housing. So, if you donât have the money or the kind of job that you will need to have for a bank to lend you money for a mortgage, youâre not going to be able to move out because youâve only got two options: You live at home or you buy a house.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;You point out that there are very few accordion families in the Nordic countries. Why?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In Sweden, if youâre still at home after the age of 18, something is really wrong with you. I asked people in Nordic countries why they thought that in places like Portugal and Spain young people stayed with their parents for a long, long time, and I was really intrigued by their answers. Their answers had nothing to do with differences of the welfare state, at all. They said things like, âWell, we think maybe they love their children more than we do,â and, âThereâs more attachment and affection in their families.â This led to one of the most surprising parts of the research project that underlies this book.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I thought the Nordic countries would look like paradise. These are the places where the problems that produce the accordion family donât exist because the state has stepped in and cured them. I was amazed to hear the Nordic interviews talk about people being lonely, feeling separated, like maybe they didnât love each other enough. It made me realize that the flip side of economic dependence, or need, across generations is a degree of commitment and affection and engagement that really isnât alive in the Nordic countries in the same way. To them the emotional side is very evident and it causes them to be self-critical about whether theyâve gone too far and made it too easy for families not to care for one another across generations because the state cares for you.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Are you advocating for any social reform in the US?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Investment in higher education has always paid off for the United States as it does in the social democracies. Â Increasingly success in the world economy depends upon skill, training, flexibility, and all of the attributes we refer to in using the phrase âhuman capital.â Sadly, the U.S has been moving away from investing state resources in higher education at precisely the time when some of our competitors are pushing hard to increase their human capital. If we do not provide access to college for worthy students whose families cannot afford to pay the high cost of higher education, we will be wasting our talent base. So yes, I do think that we should be moving in the opposite direction, as we did with one of the greatest pieces of social legislation in the countryâs history: the GI Bill.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How do these attitudes break down between ages?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think what weâre going to see is that something that started out looking like an [age-specific] trend is going to engulf multiple generations. These labor market rules that introduced short-term and part-time jobs have affected one generation of young people when it began, basically in the mid â80s. But 20 years later, itâs no longer just one generation [that is affected]. And if this keeps going â" which I think it probably will â" ultimately this will have engulfed the whole society because all the generations that come up from behind will be affected by the same labor laws. Right now, youâve got two generations side by side with very different economic realities and very different definitions of a normal process of maturation: youâve got the baby-boom generation [that] was able to be independent, and then youâve got the generation coming behind them that inherited a completely different economic world. These two groups are now grappling for what is really normal. What should we be doing? Is it my reality or your reality that ought to count? But if you fast-forward another 20 years, when virtually everyone has been affected by this trend toward short-term employment and high housing costs, itâs going to become the new normal and there wonât be a contrast, and it wonât be age-graded because itâll be everybody.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Some of the data youâve collected on the accordion family phenomenon shows that there are more men staying with their parents than there are women doing so. Why do you think that is?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Women seem to be streaking ahead in educational attainment and occupational prestige. That may be one of the least recognized, but most important changes of our time. As they graduate high school and enroll in college at a higher frequency than men, women at the high end of the skill spectrum are starting to outstrip men in their earnings. This may well translate into earlier independence. Of course, in the past, women left home before men because they married at younger ages. Now, however, skill differences born of educational differences may mean men are less prepared than the women their age.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A number of college grads not having a really clear, defined career path are often returning home to âfigure out what to do next.â &lt;strong&gt;Is this a privilege of class or reflective of a deeper social or cultural value? Â &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Class has something to do with it, but there is something else going on. When I [used to] talk to my grandparents, they never thought that work was something that gave you meaning â" it was just the way you put the roof over your head. But suddenly in the boomer generation, you have a very different way of thinking about work: Itâs to be valuable, meaningful, honorable, enjoyable, a source of identity. That has now become a kind of standard for the way we think work should be. We have accepted the notion that our children ought to have jobs that are meaningful, not just a job that puts a roof over your head. Itâs true that are all these powerful economic forces have set in motion the demand for the accordion family, but it isnât all about necessity: itâs also about desire, values, what people find useful, what theyâre proud of. And every one of these cultures has a different way of defining what kind of future is honorable.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How would you summarize parentsâ and their adult childrenâs experiences living together?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There can be a lot of stress and a lot tension because the program isnât working if the young people are not moving forward to a future [on which] everyone can agree. [There is], of course, a sacrifice of privacy. You do hear parents talk about how their golden empty nest years disappeared because the birds came back to the nest, or that theyâre having to spend a lot of money that they wouldâve otherwise saved for their own retirement to pay to take care of their kids for many years longer than they expected to. At the same â" because nothing is ever simple â" there can be a lot of joy in this.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So these parents who remember having to make sure Maryâs home at night, because itâs 12:30, are not thinking like that anymore now that Mary is 25. So they get their kids back in a different form than the way they had them when they were teenagers, and theyâre introduced to the pleasure of getting to know your child again as an adult, [someone] with whom you might have a lot in common.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;[Marriage has changed too.] I think weâre seeing a return, in some ways, to the way things were before the Second World War with the rising age of marriage and people staying home until they marry. The difference is theyâre taking such a long time to get there â" much longer than they did even before the war. In 1938 and thereabouts, you had people marrying in their mid-20s, and then it just plummeted. In the 1950s, the age of marriage in the U.S. for women was about 19 or 20. Now itâs gone way back up to 27 or 28.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What do you think future changes will look like?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think the changes to come will have to do with what happens when this baby-boom generation is really elderly, because a lot of the resources they might have saved to care for themselves will have been spent on their childrenâs advanced education and on the preservation of the accordion family itself. And there are big changes that may be coming in 10 years or so, when we discover we canât afford the nursing home solution such as it was for the earlier generation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-1511524824954804209?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/1511524824954804209/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/america-arms-dealer-to-world.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1511524824954804209'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1511524824954804209'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/america-arms-dealer-to-world.html' title='America, arms-dealer to the world'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-1238000761183435808</id><published>2012-01-24T17:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T17:30:07.028-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Aisle Hogs â12: Changing of the guard</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="story_12221781"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Tonight marks the last hurrah for a little-known congressman with a peerless knack for securing choice seating&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;span class="hasVideo"&gt;VIDEO&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/clinton_kildee-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="President Clinton shakes hands with Rep. Dale Kildee at the State of the Union Address, January 19, 1999." title="clinton_kildee" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;As soon as the sergeant-at-arms announces Barack Obamaâs arrival in the House chamber Tuesday night, you might want to pay extra-close attention to your television screen: It will probably be your last chance to catch the dean of the Aisle Hogs in action.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Rep. &lt;a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/almanac/2010/memberdistrict/258"&gt;Dale Kildee&lt;/a&gt;, an 82-year-old Michigan Democrat who has represented the Flint area since 1976, is retiring from the House at the end of this year, making this the final State of the Union address heâll attend. Thereâs a good chance youâve never heard of him, but if youâre a regular State of the Union viewer, then youâve probably seen him â" or at least the back of his head. Every year, without fail, Kildee arrives early â" very, very early â" to claim a choice spot along the center aisle, putting himself in position to greet the president as he makes his way to the front of the chamber.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Kildee is hardly the only House member to take advantage of the first-come, first-served seating policy for presidential speeches, but as best we can tell heâs been at it longer than any of his colleagues. In advance of last yearâs State of the Union, Salon came up with a name for this peculiar subspecies of congressperson: &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/24/aisle_hogs_12_changing_of_the_guard/www.salon.com/2011/01/25/aisle_hogs/"&gt;Aisle Hogs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12221781"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12221781" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Our idea was to identify the members who are most dogged about grabbing a nationally televised second of the presidentâs time on what is one of biggest nights of the year in politics. The process was thoroughly and admittedly unscientific. We looked back through C-Spanâs &lt;a href="http://www.c-span.org/SOTU/"&gt;online archive&lt;/a&gt; of the 10 previous State of the Unions and were entirely at the mercy of the random camera shots that were used for each yearâs presidential entrance. Frequent cutaways to the first lady in the balcony or to the House speaker and vice president on the dais surely allowed an Aisle Hog or two to escape detection. Still, we felt confident that the five Aisle Hogs we settled on were all worthy of the title: Kildee, &lt;a href="http://www3.nationaljournal.com/pubs/almanac/2008/people/tx/rep_tx18.htm"&gt;Sheila Jackson Lee&lt;/a&gt; of Texas, Ohioâs &lt;a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/almanac/2010/person/dennis-kucinich-oh/"&gt;Dennis Kucinich&lt;/a&gt;, New Yorkâs &lt;a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/almanac/2010/person/eliot-engel-ny/"&gt;Eliot Engel&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/almanac/2010/person/jesse-jackson-jr-il/"&gt;Jesse Jackson Jr&lt;/a&gt;. of Illinois.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Sure enough, when Barack Obama stepped onto the center aisle last January, he was almost immediately greeted by Kucinich â" and then Kildee, and then Engel and then Jackson Lee. So as we sat down to prepare our new Aisle Hog list for the 2012 State of the Union, their spots were secure. But we didnât spot Jesse Jackson Jr. last year, and while itâs possible he was hiding along the aisle in plain sight, competition for Aisle Hog status is intense. So Jackson is off the new list and replace by (drumroll) â¦ Rep. &lt;a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/almanac/person/todd-platts-pa/"&gt;Todd Platts&lt;/a&gt; of Pennsylvania.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A moderate Republican now serving his sixth term, Platts is an accomplished Aisle Hog, a fact that was &lt;a href="http://www.yorkblog.com/yorktownsquare/2012/01/19/9-fun-things-history-will-tie-to-todd-platts/"&gt;brought to our attention&lt;/a&gt; by his local newspaper, the York Daily Record, after our 2011 list appeared. Platts actually wasnât on the aisle last year, but a review of the C-Span archive finds that he was there just about every year before then. He told the Recordâs Mike Argento last year that he would secure his spot by leaving a folder on an aisle seat early in the day. Platts recently announced that he wonât seek reelection this year, and because of his past contributions to the form, weâre happy to announce that heâll spend his final year in office as an official Salon Aisle Hog.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We also have our eye on a possible successor to Platts for next year: Republican Rep. Jean Schmidt of Ohio, who won her seat in a 2005 special election and who has been on the aisle for at least the past four State of the Unions. If sheâs there again on Tuesday night, her candidacy to replace Platts will be a virtual slam dunk.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And then thereâs the matter of Kildee, who will ride off into the sunset â" and to a near-certain first ballot induction into the Aisle Hog Hall of Fame â" at the end of the year. We asked his office if he had any parting words, but didnât hear back.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Kildeeâs exit means the Aisle Hogs will have a new dean in 2013, and it will probably be Engel, a 64-year-old New Yorker who came to the House in 1993. Barring a redistricting surprise in his home state, Engel, who is easily recognizable with his glasses and mustache (which Stephen Colbert &lt;a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/49865/january-19-2006/better-know-a-district---new-york-s-17th---eliot-engel"&gt;once asked&lt;/a&gt; for the honor of combing), will have no trouble winning reelection this fall. When he appeared on last yearâs list, the New York Observer &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/24/aisle_hogs_12_changing_of_the_guard/www.observer.com/2011/politics/engel-aisle-hogging-people-would-think-i-was-sick-if-i-wasnt-there"&gt;asked&lt;/a&gt; Engel for his reaction. âNow whatâs happening is that people look for me,â he told the paper. âIf I wasnât there people would think I was sick or something. I want my constituents to know that I am well.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And with that, we present the official Salon list of Congressâs top five Aisle Hogs for 2012:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Dale Kildee&lt;/strong&gt; (D-Mich.); 82, first elected 1976&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Eliot Engel&lt;/strong&gt; (D-N.Y.), 64, first elected 1992&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee&lt;/strong&gt; (D-Texas), 62, first elected 1994&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Dennis Kucinich&lt;/strong&gt; (D-Ohio), 65, first elected 1996&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Todd Platts&lt;/strong&gt; (R-Pa.), 49, first elected 2000&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rep. Jean Schmidt&lt;/strong&gt; (R-Ohio), 60, first elected 2005 (alternate)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;* * *&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And hereâs the video we produced last year showing the Aisle Hog class of â11 in action:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12221781" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/24/aisle_hogs_12_changing_of_the_guard/singleton/" name="12221781"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000126" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_steveKornacki.png" title="Steve Kornacki" alt="Steve Kornacki" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000126" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornackiÂ  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;More Steve Kornacki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12219661"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;So far, heâs winning big with the top 1 percent â" and getting his clock cleaned with the middle class&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/mitt_romney-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="Mitt Romney" title="mitt_romney" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;The defining test of Mitt Romneyâs campaign for the Republican presidential nomination is supposed to be whether heâs able to break through the resistance that the evangelical Christians and Tea Party true believers who comprise the GOP base feel toward him. But the first three contests have revealed a different problem, one with potentially serious general election consequences: Enthusiasm for Romney seems directly related to income level.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So far, Romney has fared best among Republican primary voters from the highest income tier, while struggling mightily with the middle and working classes. Consider Saturdayâs South Carolina results. Romney lost the primary to Newt Gingrich by a 40 to 27 percent margin. But according to the &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/epolls/sc"&gt;exit poll&lt;/a&gt;, among voters with incomes over $200,000, Romney was actually the nightâs big winner, swamping Gingrich by 15 points, 47 to 32 percent. Where Gingrich did his damage was with those making between $50,000 and $100,000 (41 to 25 percent) and $30,000 and $50,000 (42 to 22 percent).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12219661"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12219661" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;The same phenomenon was evident in New Hampshire and Iowa.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Since itâs practically his home state (and since its GOP electorate is &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/why_new_hampshire_doesnt_matter/"&gt;far more secular and independent-friendly&lt;/a&gt; than the national norm), Romney &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/epolls/nh"&gt;fared well to very well with just about every demographic group&lt;/a&gt; in the Granite State, winning with 39 percent overall. But he actually lost the lowest income tier, those earning less than $30,000, to Ron Paul by 3 points. And he only finished 4 points ahead of Paul among the $30,000-$50,000 subgroup. But with those making between $100,000 and $200,000, it was a blowout â" Romney 47 percent, Paul 17. And the spread was even more convincing at the $200,000+ level â" 52 to 18 percent for Romney over Paul.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/epolls/ia"&gt;Iowa&lt;/a&gt;, where he received 25 percent of the statewide caucus vote (&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/oh_by_the_way_mitt_probably_lost_iowa/"&gt;at least we think!&lt;/a&gt;), Romney won a resounding victory among those making more than $100,000 â" 36 to 24 percent over his closest competitor, Rick Santorum. But he was the choice of just 16 percent of the $30,000-$50,000 subgroup and only 15 percent of those earning less than $30,000.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This data suggests two problems for Romney. The first is urgent: The national Republican electorate is evolving, with less-educated, lower-income voters growing in numbers. Heâs going to have to win them over if heâs going to beat back Newt Gingrich â" or any other primary season foe â" and secure the nomination. Particularly alarming for Romney is that this income gap doesnât seem to be a reaction to the âvulture capitalismâ attacks on his Bain Capital record and the controversy over his own tax returns. Those topics were prominent in the run-up to South Carolina (and may well have exacerbated his problems there with non-rich voters) but not in Iowa and New Hampshire. The resistance of middle- and working-class Republican voters to Romney seems to have deeper roots.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This relates to the longer-term problem for Romney: Even if he wins the nomination, he may face a unique challenge in appealing to swing voters who arenât part of the top 1 percent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Obama team, of course, is ready to paint Romney as a symbol of a pampered super-rich elite that, according to their narrative, GOP policies are designed to protect. As Iâve written before, Romneyâs campaign has been aware of this and has taken some modest steps to insulate its candidate. Rhetorically, Romney goes out of his way to claim that the middle class will be his priority as president and &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CVDfMfK5is"&gt;to insist&lt;/a&gt; that âIâm proposing no tax cuts for the rich.â And while Gingrich is calling for the outright elimination of the capital gains tax, Romney &lt;a href="http://www.issues2000.org/2011_GOP_Dartmouth.htm"&gt;has said&lt;/a&gt; he only favors cutting it for people making under $200,000. But none of this seems to be helping him. Rich Republicans overwhelmingly see Romney as their candidate, while blue-collar Republicans are far more friendly to his opponents. It suggests that Romneyâs 1 percent image is a real drag â" one that could prove costly if he makes it to the fall.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12219661" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/23/rich_republicans_sure_love_mitt/singleton/" name="12219661"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000126" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_steveKornacki.png" title="Steve Kornacki" alt="Steve Kornacki" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000126" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornackiÂ  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;More Steve Kornacki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12218241"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;If you thought Mitt Romneyâs big lead in South Carolina evaporated fast â¦&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/12/newt-gingrich-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="Newt Gingrich, would-be commander in chief" title="newt gingrich" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Presumably, polling data that is more comprehensive and authoritative will be released in the next few days, but the initial indicators point to a Florida primary race that has been utterly transformed by Newt Gingrichâs resurgence.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Just a week ago, when he was coming off victories in Iowa&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/oh_by_the_way_mitt_probably_lost_iowa/"&gt;*&lt;/a&gt; and New Hampshire and seemed on his way to a convincing South Carolina win, three different polls in the Sunshine State gave Mitt Rommey an average lead of 22 points, with Newt Gingrich running a very distant second in one of them and third (behind Rick Santorum) in the other. But now a &lt;a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2012/InsiderAdvantage_FL_0122.pdf"&gt;new one-day survey from Insider Advantage&lt;/a&gt; conducted on Sunday finds Gingrich ahead by 8 points, 34 to 26 percent, while the polling firm PPP &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#!/ppppolls/status/161265470224351234"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; late Sunday that the first night of its three-day poll in the state found a virtual tie, with just &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#!/ppppolls/status/161267070040936449"&gt;two more respondents out of 600&lt;/a&gt; choosing Romney than Gingrich.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12218241"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12218241" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mind you, there are some asterisks here. Insider Advantage is run by one of Gingrichâs former political lieutenants, &lt;a href="http://www.matttowery.com/about"&gt;Matt Towery&lt;/a&gt;, and its polling track record &lt;a href="http://marginoferror.org/?p=91"&gt;hasnât always been reliable&lt;/a&gt;. And the results from just one night of polling can be deceptive (although it should be noted that &lt;a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/01/newt-expands-south-carolina-lead.html"&gt;PPPâs final night of polling in South Carolina&lt;/a&gt; ended up being virtually identical to the &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results"&gt;actual results&lt;/a&gt; the next day).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But it wouldnât be surprising at all if the race in Florida now is a dead heat, or if Gingrich has even moved ahead, because Florida has been the epicenter of volatility in what has been an almost absurdly volatile GOP race. Just over a month ago, Gingrich found himself sitting on a gigantic lead in the state â" 48 to 25 percent in a &lt;a href="http://swampland.time.com/topline-results-of-nov-29-dec-6-2011-cnntimeorc-poll/"&gt;CNN poll&lt;/a&gt; and 47-17 in &lt;a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_FLMT_1130925.pdf"&gt;PPPâs&lt;/a&gt;. Those advantages evaporated as a Romney-aligned super PAC moved into the state with an ad barrage and as panicked national Republican voices spent December &lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2011/12/the-lizza-list-ten-conservatives-vs-newt.html"&gt;chipping away&lt;/a&gt; at Gingrichâs standing with the party base. When the glowing press that accompanied his apparent successes in Iowa and New Hampshire was added to the mix, Romney suddenly looked invincible in Florida.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the Republican universe in Florida is about as conservative and Tea Party-friendly as South Carolinaâs. So if Gingrich could rally the GOP base back to his cause in the Palmetto State, thereâs every reason to expect him to do the same in the Sunshine State, at least initially.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12218241" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/23/florida_suddenly_looks_very_different/singleton/" name="12218241"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000126" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_steveKornacki.png" title="Steve Kornacki" alt="Steve Kornacki" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000126" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornackiÂ  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;More Steve Kornacki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12213011"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Newt Gingrich just made life miserable for Mitt Romney â" and for his party&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="432" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/Screen-shot-2012-01-21-at-9.46.48-PM-432x307.png" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="On to Florida" title="Screen shot 2012-01-21 at 9.46.48 PM" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="topics"&gt;&lt;strong class="label"&gt;Topics:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/war_room/" rel="tag"&gt;War Room&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/2012_elections/" rel="tag"&gt;2012 Elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/" rel="tag"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/editors_picks/" rel="tag"&gt;Editor's Picks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Newt Gingrich wanted to make Mitt Romneyâs life miserable, and now heâs succeeded.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After getting blown out in Iowa on Jan. 3, the former House speaker all but announced he was transforming his presidential campaign into a one-man crusade to exact maximum vengeance on Romney, whose super PAC allies had crushed Gingrichâs December surge with a barrage of negative attacks. Gingrich then suffered through a predictably miserable week in New Hampshire before moving to friendlier turf in South Carolina, where he completed one of the more improbable turnarounds in modern presidential campaign history on Saturday night with a startlingly lopsided victory over Romney.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12213011"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12213011" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;The outcome severely complicates â" and potentially imperils â" Romneyâs march to the Republican nomination. As the week began, he seemed positioned to post his third victory in as many contests in South Carolina, a feat that no previous GOP candidate had achieved and that would have essentially ended the race on the spot. But with his defeat, which came after some of Romneyâs most problematic general election baggage was exposed, Romneyâs standing in national GOP polls and in the next primary state â" Florida, which votes on Jan. 31 â" figures to plummet. Questions about his appeal to the Republican base and his vulnerabilities in the fall will invite new and intense scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The good news for Romney is that he can probably make most of his troubles â" not to mention Gingrich himself â" go away with a solid win in Florida. The bad news is that Florida will look infinitely more imposing to him at the start of this coming week than it did at the start of this past one, when polls showed Romney opening a lead of more than 20 points. But the poll numbers in Florida, as elsewhere, have been absurdly volatile; it was just over a month ago that Gingrich enjoyed a 27-point lead over Romney. So the race in the Sunshine State should tighten dramatically in the days ahead, if it hasnât already.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Whatâs more, Florida proved itself in the 2010 elections to be particularly hospitable to the Tea Party strain of Republicanism that powered Gingrichâs South Carolina surge â" and that has long been suspicious of Romney. In that yearâs GOP gubernatorial primary, Rick Scott, a Tea Party-aligned outsider with a troubled past whose nomination state and national party leaders feared and strongly discouraged, defeated Bill McCollum, a well-credentialed political veteran with broad support from the party establishment. On the surface, at least, the dynamics of a Romney-Gingrich battle are rather similar.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Disrupting Romneyâs easy glide to the nomination and forcing him into such a precarious position gives Gingrich at least a measure of the revenge heâs coveted. The question, though, is whether he can parlay his South Carolina moment into a serious push for the Republican nomination.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Itâs anyoneâs guess what will happen next, but four basic scenarios seem most plausible right now:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. Mitt rights the ship&lt;/strong&gt;: Romney did his best to project confidence and steadiness in his concession speech. What he seems to be counting on is that the GOPâs opinion-shaping class will respond to Gingrichâs win Saturday night the same way it responded to his surge in early December: with panic.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Much has been made of the role the pro-Romney super PAC played in undermining Gingrich last month, and for good reason. But his poll numbers didnât just collapse in Iowa, where the ads aired; they fell everywhere. That points to the role played by many of the rightâs leading voices, commentators, activists and elected officials who remember with horror Gingrichâs run as House speaker in the 1990s and who used their platforms to lash out against him. Their warnings trickled down to rank-and-file Republicans, who began to get cold feet.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That basic pattern, in fact, has played out multiple times during the GOP campaign, with nervous party elites helping to beat back surges from candidates they saw as unfit for the nomination. Romney clearly hopes the elites â" and his super PAC buddies â" will do some dirty work for him again now, arresting Gingrichâs post-South Carolina momentum and leaving Romney in position to score a Florida victory that would silence the doubts about his viability.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2. Newt supplants Mitt&lt;/strong&gt;: On the strength of victories in Iowa&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/oh_by_the_way_mitt_probably_lost_iowa/"&gt;*&lt;/a&gt; and New Hampshire that really werenât that impressive, Romneyâs national support practically doubled and he opened large leads in South Carolina and Florida. In the wake of South Carolina, though, heâll experience the flip side of this, with his numbers tanking, just as Gingrichâs rise. So it canât be ruled out that Gingrich will roll his sudden momentum into Florida, capitalize on the stateâs Tea Party-friendliness, and engineer an equally impressive follow-up triumph â" one that might lift Gingrich into a clear lead nationally and in the next wave of states.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3. The long slog&lt;/strong&gt;: Or maybe the Florida result wonât prove much at all. The scenario is that South Carolina firmly establishes the GOP contest as a two-man race, with the Tea Party wing of the party largely uniting around Gingrich and everyone else siding with Romney. The two men would then trade wins and losses through a drawn-out, virtually momentum-less primary season â" one reminiscent of Hillary/Obama 2008, Hart/Mondale 1984 and Reagan/Ford 1976. The wild card in this would be Ron Paul, whose strategy of targeting small and midsize February caucus states and gobbling up their delegates could make him much more relevant to the race than heâs been.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4. The chaos theory&lt;/strong&gt;: This is the really fun one, and the least likely. But after Saturday night, it at least warrants a mention. The basics: What if Romney suffers such a bad loss in Florida that his campaign melts down completely and elite Republicans lose confidence in his ability to stop Gingrich? If they really are committed to stopping the former speaker, these elites would then be in need of a Plan B, leading to the âwhite knightâ scenario â" a new candidate drafted into the race who could qualify for the late big-state primaries and to prevent Gingrich from racking up the delegates heâd need for a first ballot nomination. There are many reasons to sniff at this possibility, not the least of which is that itâs unclear if the GOP has any candidate on the sidelines whoâd be capable of this. But if Mitt canât get the job done in Florida, expect to hear it mentioned a lot.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12213011" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/22/the_gop%E2%80%99s_south_carolina_nightmare/singleton/" name="12213011"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000126" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_steveKornacki.png" title="Steve Kornacki" alt="Steve Kornacki" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000126" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornackiÂ  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;More Steve Kornacki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12203731"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;The two very different narratives that could emerge from Saturdayâs South Carolina results&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/Mitt-Romney2-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="Former Massachusetts governor and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney" title="Romney campaign now bracing for defeat" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;If youâre looking for a silver lining in what has been a pretty rotten week for Mitt Romney, itâs this: The expectations for Saturdayâs South Carolina primary have shifted so dramatically that even a razor-thin Romney victory will now be seen as a momentous triumph, while anything short of an outright win for Newt Gingrich will be regarded as a crushing disappointment.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The three most recent polls in the state all show Gingrich &lt;a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/sc/south_carolina_republican_presidential_primary-1590.html"&gt;pushing into the lead&lt;/a&gt; after trailing by double-digits earlier this week, and &lt;a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/sc/south_carolina_republican_presidential_primary-1590.html"&gt;RealClearPoliticsâ polling average&lt;/a&gt; now puts him a point ahead of Romney. And itâs likely that &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_power_of_conservative_victimhood/"&gt;Gingrichâs performance&lt;/a&gt; at Thursday nightâs debate did nothing to slow his momentum, and may actually have increased it. So itâs not surprising that the Romney campaign is already seeking to soften the blow from a South Carolina loss. As the Huffington Postâs &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/01/20/mitt-romney-south-carolina-primary_n_1218766.html"&gt;Jon Ward reported&lt;/a&gt;, one of Romneyâs top surrogates, former New Hampshire Governor and Bush 41 Chief of Staff John Sununu, is again playing up the long game:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12203731"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12203731" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;âI think youâre going to see the same kind of long slog that you saw in â76, with [Gerald] Ford and [Ronald] Reagan, that it took the whole thing to win,â Sununu told reporters.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âThis is a long slog,â Sununu said. â[Romney]âs never suggested one or two or three primaries or caucuses would make the difference. The whole campaign has been designed to go through the long slog.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Asked what Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, will need to do if Gingrich beats him in South Carolina, Sununu responded, âHe has to do what they intended to do from the beginning: slog along.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âMitt Romneyâs strength has been clearly defined as being ready for a long campaign under the new rules,â Sununu said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;This was the same message that Romneyâs campaign emphasized back in December, when Gingrich opened wide leads in national and key early state polls. But when Gingrichâs numbers returned to earth and Romney posted victories in Iowa&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/oh_by_the_way_mitt_probably_lost_iowa/"&gt;*&lt;/a&gt; and New Hampshire, the campaign didnât exactly fight the conventional wisdom that a third win in South Carolina would effectively end the GOP contest.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Of course, Sununuâs basic point is right â" financially and organizationally, Romneyâs campaign does seem far more suited for a drawn-out battle than Gingrich. But Gingrichâs South Carolina rise is further proof of how unusually volatile this GOP race is â" and how sensitive to shifts in the dominant press narrative public opinion can be. On the strength of &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/a_newt_win_would_be_a_lot_of_fun/"&gt;two relatively unimpressive victories&lt;/a&gt; (one of which wasnât even a victory, &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/oh_by_the_way_mitt_probably_lost_iowa/"&gt;it turns out&lt;/a&gt;), Romney practically doubled his support nationally and opened commanding leads in South Carolina and Florida â" two states that had seemed resistant to him for months. But just in the past few days, as the âGingrich comebackâ narrative has taken hold, that South Carolina lead has vanished and his national advantage &lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/dailynumbers.aspx"&gt;has shrunk&lt;/a&gt; to just ten points.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thus, the narrative that emerges from South Carolina Saturday night will go a long way toward shaping the GOP race in Florida. And here there are two very different possibilities:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Romney holds off Gingrich&lt;/strong&gt;: It was one of the worst weeks Romneyâs campaign has faced, but in the end Republican voters in the Tea Party capital of America â" a state where he finished a very distant fourth the last time he ran â" found enough to like about Romney, and were clearly unnerved by the profound personal baggage of his chief rival, which featured prominently in the final pre-South Carolina debate and was aired by his ex-wife in an interview that aired 36 hours before voting began. By surviving a stiff test in such inhospitable territory, Romney has regained his footing, proven he can take a hit, and emerged well positioned to post another victory ten days from now in Florida.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gingrich completes his stunning comeback&lt;/strong&gt;: Left for dead just a week ago, the former House Speaker revived his campaign with two dramatic debate performances and benefited from Mitt Romneyâs self-inflicted tax wounds and his inability to win the trust of the conservative base â" particularly evangelical voters, who may not be able to overlook his Mormon faith. Seen as the inevitable nominee at the start of this week, Romney now faces a troubling reality: Heâs lost two of the first three contests, with his only victory coming in what is essentially his home state.Â  Florida, a state that provided one of the Tea Party movementâs &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/24/health-care-exec-scott-holds-lead-mccollum-florida-governor-primary/"&gt;signature primary season triumphs in 2010&lt;/a&gt;, now looms as a critical â" maybe even do-or-die â" test for him.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12203731" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/20/suddenly_mitt_is_bracing_for_defeat/singleton/" name="12203731"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000126" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_steveKornacki.png" title="Steve Kornacki" alt="Steve Kornacki" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000126" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornackiÂ  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;More Steve Kornacki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-1238000761183435808?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/1238000761183435808/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/aisle-hogs-a12-changing-of-guard.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1238000761183435808'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1238000761183435808'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/aisle-hogs-a12-changing-of-guard.html' title='Aisle Hogs â12: Changing of the guard'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-2641686982555267441</id><published>2012-01-24T16:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T16:30:03.637-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Why playing the sex card backfires</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="story_12228791"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Anybody who thinks allegations of infidelity will harm a presidential contender doesn't know the American people&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/marianne_gingrich-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="He's a cheater? Who cares?" title="marianne_gingrich" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="topics"&gt;&lt;strong class="label"&gt;Topics:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/" rel="tag"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/2012_elections/" rel="tag"&gt;2012 Elections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;First he was down and out â" a has-been toting sexually tainted baggage. Then, with an unexpected resurgence, he turned into a viable contender, even showing a lead in the polls. Then came more ugly disclosures about his personal life and a sharp drop below the leading candidate. But surprise, surprise, his numbers begin to soar for the upcoming primary. Wait, hold everything; even more damaging accusations of sexual misconduct from an ex-wife hit the front pages.&lt;a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/candidates-discuss-marital-infidelity-during-iowa-gop-debate/"&gt;Â The media and politicians&lt;/a&gt;Â are&lt;a href="http://www.torontosun.com/2012/01/20/eye-of-newt-sex-storm"&gt;Â outraged&lt;/a&gt;Â and assume that the public is as well. Itâs a knockout blow, they forecast. But now theyâre puzzled that his standing in the polls continues to rise, with some pundits saying he might win the South Carolina Republican primary. Finally, the results are in and, miracle of miracles, Newt Gingrich is the winner. Big time.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;How did this happen? How did a man whose sexual peccadilloesÂ &lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1721111_1721210_1883910,00.html"&gt;rivaled those of so many others&lt;/a&gt;Â manage to sidestep severe political consequences? The answer is simple.Â The sex card doesnât work anymore, particularly when indiscretions are old news and involve consenting adults. Voters of both parties want to hear about affairs ofÂ Â state, not of the bedroom.Â A look at the history of infidelity and sexual mores shows why this public shift in priorities has taken place.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Infidelity has risen steadily since&lt;a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3QfxMFBlq4EC&amp;amp;pg=PA10&amp;amp;lpg=PA10&amp;amp;dq=migration%20to%20cities%20and%20adultery&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=U4uFIwMaae&amp;amp;sig=KIIyBzyR4txkq4fH"&gt;Â the urbanization&lt;/a&gt;Â of societies. This tells us that straying is strongly tied to opportunity. In close-knit agricultural communities, comings and goings of everyone were pretty much an open book. It was tricky to keep infidelity secret. But as we know from literature and famous scandals, men managed to find ways around challenging obstacles. Not so for married women, who were confined to the home, exposing them to closer scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That all changed with the Industrial Revolution, which moved families off the farms to anonymous settings in sprawling urban centers. The new work world away from home offered men wider opportunities for sexual liaisons. Women were still more socially restricted than men, Â but they too had more prospects for extramarital affairs even though their dalliances might be confined to the butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly, early surveys showed muchÂ &lt;a href="http://faculty.unlv.edu/fifes2/pdf/Infidelity%20and%20Extramarital%20Sex.pdf"&gt;higher percentagesÂ &lt;/a&gt;of men than women committing infidelity. Before Alfred KinseyâsÂ &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;amp;field-keywords=Alfre%20Kinsey&amp;amp;x=0&amp;amp;y=0"&gt;groundbreaking studies&lt;/a&gt;Â of male and female sexuality in the 1950s the preponderance of male infidelity was explained by a prevailing myth: Males were hormonally wired for ravenous sexual arousal while women, with more subdued libidos, grudgingly submitted to male sexual demands.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The sexual revolution that exploded on the scene in the 1960s gave greater license for sexual expression â" and awakened women to their equal, if not superior, status as sexual beings.Â &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Human-Sexual-Response-William-Masters/dp/0923891218/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1327358663&amp;amp;sr=1-2"&gt;Masters and JohnsonÂ &lt;/a&gt;and other pioneering researchers added to Kinseyâs findings, confirming the patterns of sexual arousal for men and women throughout the life cycle. These studies showed that males reach peak sexual arousal in their early 20s and, for most men, it remains at that level until about age 30 when physical sexual response begins a slow decline.Â  In contrast, female sexual arousal capability peaks in the mid-30s and maintains that plateau through the 60s, showing only Â slight decline later. Emboldened by awakened sexuality, and greater freedom and independence, women would soon begin to play catch-up with men. But it would take another revolution to ratchet the numbers even higher.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Enter&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Feminine-Mystique-Betty-Friedan/dp/0393322572/ref=sr_1_sc_1?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1327294202&amp;amp;sr=1-1-spell"&gt;Â Betty FriedanÂ &lt;/a&gt;and the feminist movement of the 1960s. As women began to assume the same work roles as men, the playing fields for infidelity began to equalize. Economic pressure turned more and more spouses into two-paycheck partners. The number of women in the workplace swelled,Â &lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1986/09/women-in-the-work-force/4924/"&gt;particularly in male-dominated Â professionsÂ &lt;/a&gt;Â like law, banking and financial management. Women whose contacts with men were onceÂ  limited to butchers and bakers now found themselves in the company of male professionals and executives every day, often in a highly charged atmosphere that led all too easily to intimacy.Â  As comedian Rodney Dangerfield lamented, âI asked my wife to have sex. She said, I already gave at the office.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And indeed women were âplaying around,â as the title ofÂ  Linda WolfâsÂ &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Playing-Around-Women-Extramarital-Sex/dp/0595167349/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1327358409&amp;amp;sr=1-1"&gt;popular book&lt;/a&gt;Â suggests. By 1977, a bestselling book based on research byÂ &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;amp;field-keywords=shere%20Hite&amp;amp;x=0&amp;amp;y=0"&gt;Shere Hite&lt;/a&gt;Â was able to report that 75 percent of married women had cheated â" exceeding the numbers that had ever been reported for their male counterparts. (Kinsey reported thatÂ  by age 40, 50 percent of married menÂ &lt;a href="http://family.jrank.org/pages/884/Infidelity-Studying-Sexual-Infidelity.html"&gt;were unfaithful&lt;/a&gt;.) While Hiteâs study is not the most reliable, because it surveyed a skewed sample of upscale sophisticated women, it surely pointed in the accurate upward direction.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;More recent surveys say that &lt;a href="http://www.truthaboutdeception.com/cheating-and-infidelity/stats-about-infidelity.html"&gt;30 to 60 percent&lt;/a&gt;Â of married men and women have cheated. But the real rate of infidelity is most likely greater than reported. Even if a questionnaire is âanonymous,â many respondents are unwilling to admit cheating on their spouses. While we canât be certain of the precise numbers, itâs evident that infidelity is widespread.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And letâs not forget that the advent of drugs to treat erectile dysfunction has given fresh meaning to the oldÂ &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZqRL7nJB48"&gt;Gene AutryÂ &lt;/a&gt;cowboy song âBack in the Saddle Again.â The Viagra revolution has catapulted many older men off the bench and into the infidelity game. According to one report, âone out of ten women says her partner cheated on her for the first timeÂ &lt;a href="http://www.oprah.com/relationships/Does-Viagra-Make-Men-Cheat"&gt;after taking the drug.&lt;/a&gt;â Consider Â also our highly sexualized society. Some estimates say that Americans spend as much as &lt;a href="http://womansavers.com/infidelity-statistics.asp"&gt;$12 billion a year&lt;/a&gt;Â on pornography, which is âmore than all combined revenues of all professional football, baseball and basketball franchises.â&lt;em&gt;Â &lt;/em&gt;ForbesÂ challenges those figures and comes up with&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/25/0524porn.html"&gt;Â a lower number&lt;/a&gt; â" a mere $3.9 billion. Not exactly pocket change.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And thereâs more. Add the ârespectableâ sex content on cable television shows that are exempt from network standards. And even Â some of todayâs PG films would have been censored in previous eras. I recently watched a classic 1958 film â" âThe Loversâ â" by famed French director Louis Malle and was shocked to learn it was considered so scandalous that it was banned in many countries and in communities throughout the U.S. What was so outrageous? A married woman has a one-night stand with an overnight guest at her country estate. She then runs off with him. In the only sex scene, in which the partners are mostly fully clothed, we catch a brief glimpse of Jeanne Moreauâs breasts. Cut those few seconds and the film would get an easy PG rating today, if not a B for boring or an S for silly.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;How does all this relate to Newt Gingrichâs victory in South Carolina? People who claim thatÂ  errant sexual behavior should disqualify a candidate donât really vote that position. Bill Clintonâs standing in the polls rose after it was disclosed he had an affair with an intern, even as Republicans sought to impeach him for lying about it. After revelations about Gingrichâs marriage, evangelical voters in South Carolina flocked to the serial polygamist candidate and abandoned the candidate who had been married to the same woman for four decades. Most people areÂ &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/writer/bernard_starr/"&gt;also hypocritical&lt;/a&gt;Â when it comes to their own behavior. Thereâs a big gap between what people profess and what they actually do.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That should serve as a warning to politicians and the media tempted to play the infidelity sex card against a political foe. Donât count on raising an enthusiastic hanging posse for cheaters. And if you think you will incite fundamentalists to throw the first stones, think again. The TV series âDesperate Housewives,â whichÂ &lt;a href="http://www.accessatlanta.com/celebrities-tv/etonline-headlines/desperate-housewives-returns-with-145354.html"&gt;elevates adultery&lt;/a&gt;Â to an Olympic sport, has a&lt;a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2005-02-21/features/0502210120_1_bible-belt-show-country-music"&gt;Â loyal following&lt;/a&gt;Â in the Bible Belt.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/bernard_starr/"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Bernard Starr is a psychologist and journalist. He is co-author of "The Starr â"Weiner Report on Sex and Sexuality in the Mature Years" (McGraw Hill) and "Stalemates: The Truth About Extramarital Affairs" (New Horizon Press)Â  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/bernard_starr/"&gt;More Bernard Starr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12228361"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Adelson's spent $10 million on anti-Romney ads. You can bet he expects a kickback if Gingrich wins&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/image-3-460x307.png" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="image (3)" title="image (3)" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="topics"&gt;&lt;strong class="label"&gt;Topics:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/2012_elections/" rel="tag"&gt;2012 Elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/" rel="tag"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/campaign_finance/" rel="tag"&gt;Campaign Finance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;div class="editorsNote"&gt;This originally appeared on Robert Reich's &lt;a href="http://robertreich.org/"&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino owner, is now the poster boy for whatâs terribly wrong with our campaign-finance system. Adelson, you may recall, had, before the South Carolina Republican primary, donated $5 million to the pro-Gingrich Super Pac âWinning Our Futureâ â" giving Newt a pile of money for negative advertising against Mitt Romney in South Carolina.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Adelson has done it again. He and his wife Marian have cut another $5 million check for Gingrich to go negative on Romney in Florida. The money wonât go as far as it did in South Carolina â" TV ads cost a lot more in Florida â" but itâs enough to give the Grinch a solid footing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12228361"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12228361" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;And, who knows? The Adelsons are billionaires. They might decide to put in another $5 million or perhaps $20 million into Gingrichâs Super Pac. The point is, thereâs no limit.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Do you know who Sheldon and Marian Adelson are? Do you know what Gingrich has promised them, or what they think theyâll get out of a Grinch presidency? I donât. But if Newt becomes President of the United States, theyâll be singularly responsible. And we better find out, because Newt will owe them big time.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forget the Lincoln Bedroom. The Adelsons and their kids will have the run of the White House, including the Oval Office. Hey, theyâll take over the Old Executive Building next door and turn it into a casino.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Never before in the history of American politics has a single couple given more money to a single candidate and had a bigger impact â" all courtesy of the Supreme Court and its grotesque decisions that speech is money and corporations are people under the First Amendment.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12228361" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/24/the_billionaire_behind_newt/singleton/" name="12228361"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/robert_reich/"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Robert Reich, a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was secretary of labor during the Clinton administration. He is also a &lt;a href="http://robertreich.org/"&gt;blogger&lt;/a&gt; and the author of &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0307592812/?tag=fu0b5-20"&gt;"Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future."&lt;/a&gt;Â  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/robert_reich/"&gt;More Robert Reich&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12223431"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Even as he goes after Gingrich for working for Freddie Mac, Romney has surrounded himself with lobbyists&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/mitt_and_newt-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich" title="mitt_and_newt" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="topics"&gt;&lt;strong class="label"&gt;Topics:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/2012_elections/" rel="tag"&gt;2012 Elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/lobbyists/" rel="tag"&gt;Lobbyists&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/lobbying/" rel="tag"&gt;lobbying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/mitt_romney/" rel="tag"&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/" rel="tag"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Part of the aggressive new Romney campaign offensive against Newt Gingrich is to attack Gingrich for having been a lobbyist. The irony of the strategy is that Mitt Romney has surrounded himself with multiple registered lobbyists at the highest level of his campaign.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âOver the last 15 years since he left the House, he talks about great bold movements and ideas,â Romney &lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71802.html"&gt;told&lt;/a&gt; a Florida crowd this week. âWell, whatâs he been doing for 15 years? Heâs been working as a lobbyist, yeah, heâs been working as a lobbyist and selling influence around Washington.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12223431"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12223431" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;In fact, Gingrich has never been a &lt;em&gt;registered&lt;/em&gt; lobbyist â" a distinction that Gingrich &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/23/politics/republican-debate/index.html"&gt;invoked&lt;/a&gt; in the Monday night debate â" but his âstrategic adviceâ &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-15/gingrich-said-to-be-paid-by-freddie-mac-to-win-republican-allies.html"&gt;work&lt;/a&gt; for Freddie Mac looked a lot like what can be colloquially described as lobbying, or at least something close to it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And Gingrichâs work for healthcare companies in his post-congressional career looks even more like lobbying than the Freddie Mac consulting. The Times &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/politics/gingrich-gave-push-to-clients-not-just-ideas.html?pagewanted=all"&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; in November:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a variety of instances, documents and interviews show, Mr. Gingrich arranged meetings between executives and officials, and salted his presentations to lawmakers with pitches for his clients, who pay as much as $200,000 a year to belong to hisÂ Center for Health Transformation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When the center sponsored a âhealth transformation summitâ at the Florida State Capitol in March 2006, lawmakers who attended Mr. Gingrichâs keynote speech inside the House chamber received a booklet promoting not just ideas but also the specific services of two dozen of his clients. Executives from some of those companies sat on panels for discussions that lawmakers were encouraged to attend after Mr. Gingrichâs address.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney is now &lt;a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/romney-warns-of-october-surprises-if-gingrich-is-nominee/"&gt;suggesting&lt;/a&gt; that Gingrich did not register as a lobbyist when perhaps, by law, he should have.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But this line of attack is undermined by the fact that the Romney campaign is chock-full of people who have been lobbyists. They include:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Former Sen. Jim Talent, a Romney surrogate and co-chairman of a top Washington lobby shop, Mercury Public Affairs, which has recently worked for big banks and the coal industry. (We explored Talentâs recent background &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/23/politics/republican-debate/index.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Charlie Black, an informal Romney advisor who is easily one of the best-known Republican lobbyists of his generation. Black has recently &lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/romney_and_adviser_at_odds_on_immigration/singleton/"&gt;lobbied&lt;/a&gt; for Boeing, WalMart and the financial services industry.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Ron Kaufman, who, according to the &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/Boston/politicalintelligence/2012/01/mitt-romney-who-once-hit-john-mccain-for-lobbyists-gets-advice-from-one-them/bQmGP3WY2JeJiwyzGpoTLM/index.html"&gt;Globe&lt;/a&gt;, has been traveling with the Romney campaign and providing strategic advice. He was formerly chairman of the &lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/firmsum.php?id=D000021966&amp;amp;year=2011"&gt;Dutko Group Worldwide&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Former Rep. Vin Weber, a Romney policy advisor and also managing &lt;a href="http://www.clarkandweinstock.com/our_team/id.32/staff_detail.asp"&gt;partner&lt;/a&gt; at Clark &amp;amp; Weinstock.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;The lobbyist question is not a new one for Romney. Back in his first presidential run in 2007, he famously got into a verbal tussle with an Associated Press reporter who challenged Romneyâs claim that lobbyists were not running his campaign. The must-see video of that exchange is &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdGUSjd3Tmo&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12223431" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/24/romney_attacks_newt_as_lobbyist/singleton/" name="12223431"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/justin_elliott/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000077" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_justinElliott.png" title="Justin Elliott" alt="Justin Elliott" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000077" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Justin Elliott is a Salon reporter. Reach him by email at jelliott@salon.com and follow him on Twitter &lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/elliottjustin"&gt;@ElliottJustin&lt;/a&gt;Â  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/justin_elliott/"&gt;More Justin Elliott&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12225531"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Gingrich gets "sad" about "personal, nasty" attacks as Romney tax returns show he paid 13.9 percent on $21 million&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/debate-e1327384734776-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich" title="Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="topics"&gt;&lt;strong class="label"&gt;Topics:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/mitt_romney/" rel="tag"&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/" rel="tag"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/2012_elections/" rel="tag"&gt;2012 Elections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Newt Gingrich clearly missed the rabid South Carolina crowds at Monday nightâs debate. NBC asked the Tampa, Fla. audience not to cheer, and mostly they didnât, leaving Gingrich listless without angry mob energy. He didnât bash the media the way he did in last weekâs Fox and CNN debates, and he tried to act presidential when Mitt Romney jabbed him about his work for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But he failed. Presidents donât pout. A sulky Gingrich complained the GOP campaign had become âunnecessarily personal and nasty, and thatâs sad.â Gingrich objecting to âpersonal and nastyâ is as believable as Romney pretending he does his own laundry. Thatâs really sad. But Romney had the better night, hitting Gingrich early and often for having to resign the House speakership âin disgraceâ due to ethics charges. And when Gingrich tried to claim he left his leadership post voluntarily, Ron Paul double-teamed him with Romney. âHe didnât have the votes, that was what the problem was,â Gingrichâs former House colleague told the crowd.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12225531"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12225531" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also Monday night, &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-24/romney-paid-13-9-percent-tax-rate-on-21-6-million-2010-income.html"&gt;Romney made partial tax returns available to reporters&lt;/a&gt;. They showed he paid a rate of 13.9 percent in 2011 and 2010, on income of around $21 million both years. That means in a single day, Romney earned more than the median income for U.S. workers, just over $31,000. He paid a lower tax rate than workers making $40,000 to $50,000, because his income came from investments (somehow it seems he didnât have to declare the $374,000 he made last year from speaking fees; itâs still not clear how he dodged that.) Tuesday morning the focus will be back on Romneyâs shamefully low tax rate, and the way he earned his wealth at Bain Capital. Monday night he got his licks in on Gingrich.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney hammered Gingrich hard on some financial information Gingrich released Monday: his contract with Freddie Mac. While Gingrich insists he didnât lobby, Romney noted that his newly released contract showed he was hired by the firmâs chief lobbyist. âWe have congressmen who say you lobbied them,â he told his rival. âI didnât lobby them,â Gingrich shot back, his voice getting high and whiny the way it did when that Iowa voter told him he was a disgrace to his party last spring. At one point he fell awkwardly silent. âYou can call it whatever you like, I call it influence peddling,â Romney concluded. Score that round for the wealthy former frontrunner.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But if it was a good night for Romney, thatâs mainly in contrast to a lot of bad nights, when he let Gingrich prevail. The man shouldnât be allowed to speak unscripted. Though he got off some good punches at Gingrich, he didnât do much to sell himself to the conservative GOP base. While he took the standard GOP line and trashed the Dodd-Frank banking reform law, he nonetheless backed banking regulation â" and he came off like a tool of finance capitalism as he did it. âYou canât have everybody open a bank in their garage!â he exclaimed, sounding like a modern-day Mr. Potter.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Again he bragged that even if he didnât defeat Ted Kennedy for Massachusetts senator, âI made him take out a mortgage on his house,â which sounded like the way a rich guy would boast about besting another rich guy, not the way an American runs for president. Even on a good night he sounds like a corporate motivational speaker, at one point ticking off the seven keys to emerging from the recession like he was selling âThe Seven Habits of Highly Effective Economies.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He sounded uncommonly robotic, even for Romney, when he said he didnât think illegal immigrants needed to be rounded up because âI believe in self-deportation.â But that line wasnât just awkward language, itâs cruel GOP politics. The backers of the latest wave of anti-immigration legislation use the Orwellian term âself-deportationâ to describe what will happen when they harass undocumented immigrants enough â" with obstacles to working, renting, attending school or getting health care â" that theyâll âself-deport,â as in exit the country.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If the candidates once again had no ideas for reviving the economy, they were even scarier on the issues of foreign policy. Despite the NBC ban on applause, the crowd clapped when Romney hoped for Fidel Castroâs death, and clapped louder still when Gingrich said the Cuban leader will go to hell. Interestingly, Ron Paul got the loudest applause when he denounced tough sanctions on Cuba because âthe Cold War is over.â Thatâs either a sign of how much Florida GOP politics has changed when it comes to Cuba, or how many supporters Paul got into the debate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;On the question of war with Iran, which everyone but Paul seems to dream about, I thought again about how unlikely a populist Gingrich really is. âThe American people have no interest in going to war anywhere,â he said imperiously, not even to retaliate for Pearl Harbor or 9/11. Boy, we sound like a bunch of sissies. But given our âhistoric commitment to freedom of the seas,â Gingrich seemed to believe we ought to go to war over Iranâs threats to close the Straits of Hormuz, the wimpy American public be damned.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I missed the rowdy GOP audience in this debate. Everyone who watches plays the popular guessing game, âWhat cruelty will provoke lusty boos or cheers this time around?â Will they applaud the death penalty, people dying without medical care, the idea that the unemployed deserve their fate or the dressing down of the only black moderator? Will they boo gay soldiers or a moderatorâs timid question about Gingrichâs second adultery-driven divorce? Gingrich wasnât the only one disappointed NBC silenced the crowd.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12225531" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/24/mitt_pounces_newt_pouts_two_rich_guys_squabble/singleton/" name="12225531"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/joan_walsh/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10004425" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_joanWalsh_b.png" title="Joan Walsh" alt="Joan Walsh" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10004425" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large.Â  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/joan_walsh/"&gt;More Joan Walsh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12222021"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Maybe Daniels or Jindal should enter the race next month and we can take this thing all the way to the convention!&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="460" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/daniels_kristol-460x307.jpg" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="Mitch Daniels and Bill Kristol" title="daniels_kristol" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="topics"&gt;&lt;strong class="label"&gt;Topics:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/2012_elections/" rel="tag"&gt;2012 Elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/" rel="tag"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/mitch_daniels/" rel="tag"&gt;Mitch Daniels&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/bill_kristol/" rel="tag"&gt;Bill Kristol&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/mitt_romney/" rel="tag"&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/republican_party/" rel="tag"&gt;Republican Party&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;No serious person thinks Newt Gingrich will be or wants Newt Gingrich to be president. Iâd bet a significant percentage of the people who &lt;em&gt;vote&lt;/em&gt; for him donât want him to be president. Voting for Newt Gingrich is just an act of pure petulance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But Newt Gingrich just won the South Carolina presidential primary (South Carolinaâs new motto: âPicking presidents a couple times since a couple years ago!â) and is now amusingly ahead in the early polls in Florida. The conservative elite can attempt to sabotage Gingrich, but the message from the voters is clear enough: Romney is really not particularly liked, at all, and they are willing to vote for literally anyone else who can seem credible on television for a few precious minutes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12222021"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12222021" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Bill Kristolâs Weekly Standard was quietly promoting Gingrich since just before his first surge in the polls, &lt;a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/candidate-be-drafted-later_617478.html"&gt;and Kristol himself early this morning&lt;/a&gt; asserted that of Gingrich, Romney and Santorum, âany of the three could be the nominee.â (No, actually, but this is Bill Kristol.) He then quotes an editorial he wrote two months ago, predicting, sort of, âa late January entry [I'd now say an early February entry] by another candidate.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And he ends with: âI notice a new online petition was launched Saturday night to try to produce one possible outcome. Itâs at &lt;a href="http://runmitchrun.com/"&gt;runmitchrun.com&lt;/a&gt;.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The idea, still apparently existent, that what this electorate â" having previously paid close attention to statesmen like Donald Trump and Herman Cain before turning to Newt Gingrich â" is clamoring for is the respectable conservativism of Mitch Daniels is fun enough. (You didnât like the former governors of New Mexico or Utah? Try Indianaâs current guy â" heâs also a former pharmaceutical executive!) Rahm Emanuel himself &lt;a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/rahm-emanuel-mitch-daniels-stronger-against-obama/331221"&gt;just teased Mitt Romney by suggesting Chris Christie or Mitch Daniels wouldâve been perfect to run against Obama.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But actually parachuting into the presidential campaign after Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and presumably Florida and Nevada have all voted would certainly be a â¦ challenge for anyone who doesnât currently already have a massive campaign war chest and experienced national campaign staff. (Though obviously this election is so different, because complete clowns like Gingrich and Santorum can win â¦ after spending the better part of a year campaigning.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ross Douthat &lt;a href="http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/calling-mitch-daniels/"&gt;is at least realistic about a latecomerâs chances&lt;/a&gt; (he or she â" well, he â" âwould have a necessarily uncertain path to the nominationâ) but says âit isnât too late for one of the non-candidates to change their mind and run,â which is I guess &lt;em&gt;technically&lt;/em&gt; true. A non-candidate could change their mind and run the weekend of the convention, too! Iâd be all in favor of it, and I suspect the president would be, too.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Good news, then: &lt;a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/boss-ross_617535.html"&gt;âa source tells me that a representative from runmitchrun.com will be on Fox News today at 4:45 p.m. making the case that Daniels gets in the race.â&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/an-open-letter-to-republican-leaders/2012/01/21/gIQA9abjGQ_blog.html"&gt;Jennifer Rubin flat-out begs&lt;/a&gt; Haley Barbour(!), Mitch Daniels, Bobby Jindal, Jon Kyl, Marco Rubio, Jim DeMint, Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan and Mike Pence to either run themselves or hurry up and close ranks behind either Santorum or Romney â" Jim DeMintâs late entry to the presidential race would be good February entertainment, itâs true â" which seems to miss the fact that those people have about as much control over the party electorate now as John Boehner has over the Republican House majority.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;(Jonah Goldberg should get some credit for being slightly ahead of the curve for once, having posted his slightly tongue-in-cheek version of this plea &lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/288537/lets-have-do-over-jonah-goldberg"&gt;last Thursday,&lt;/a&gt; before Gingrich had even humiliated the probable nominee in South Carolina.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There is a great deal of point-missing going on. Each of these savior non-Romney Gingrich-killing dream candidates completely lacks the quality that led Gingrich to suddenly take the lead: No one likes him and heâs embarrassing. The voters respond to his breezy shamelessness, and Bobby Jindal is not going to fire this crowd up. (Chris Christie, a loud bullying caricature, might do the trick, but heâs too smart to enter now.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am also not sure how essentially begging for a brokered convention helps alleviate the âchaosâ everyone is currently worrying over, but, again, I welcome the entertainment.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Sadly, theyâre probably still stuck with Mitt. Sorry, Bill.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12222021" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/23/conservatives_demand_new_candidate_to_throw_race_into_further_disarray/singleton/" name="12222021"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/alex_pareene/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000101" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_alexPareene.png" title="Alex Pareene" alt="Alex Pareene" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000101" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon. Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareeneÂ  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/alex_pareene/"&gt;More Alex Pareene&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="story_12213011"&gt; &lt;h3 class="deck"&gt;Newt Gingrich just made life miserable for Mitt Romney â" and for his party&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;div class="art"&gt;&lt;img width="432" height="307" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/01/Screen-shot-2012-01-21-at-9.46.48-PM-432x307.png" class="attachment-lg_horizontal wp-post-image" alt="On to Florida" title="Screen shot 2012-01-21 at 9.46.48 PM" /&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="topics"&gt;&lt;strong class="label"&gt;Topics:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/war_room/" rel="tag"&gt;War Room&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/2012_elections/" rel="tag"&gt;2012 Elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/" rel="tag"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/topic/editors_picks/" rel="tag"&gt;Editor's Picks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="entryContent clearfix"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Newt Gingrich wanted to make Mitt Romneyâs life miserable, and now heâs succeeded.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After getting blown out in Iowa on Jan. 3, the former House speaker all but announced he was transforming his presidential campaign into a one-man crusade to exact maximum vengeance on Romney, whose super PAC allies had crushed Gingrichâs December surge with a barrage of negative attacks. Gingrich then suffered through a predictably miserable week in New Hampshire before moving to friendlier turf in South Carolina, where he completed one of the more improbable turnarounds in modern presidential campaign history on Saturday night with a startlingly lopsided victory over Romney.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="continue-reading-wrap" id="story-12213011"&gt; &lt;div id="fold-12213011" class="hidden" status="invisible"&gt; &lt;p&gt;The outcome severely complicates â" and potentially imperils â" Romneyâs march to the Republican nomination. As the week began, he seemed positioned to post his third victory in as many contests in South Carolina, a feat that no previous GOP candidate had achieved and that would have essentially ended the race on the spot. But with his defeat, which came after some of Romneyâs most problematic general election baggage was exposed, Romneyâs standing in national GOP polls and in the next primary state â" Florida, which votes on Jan. 31 â" figures to plummet. Questions about his appeal to the Republican base and his vulnerabilities in the fall will invite new and intense scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The good news for Romney is that he can probably make most of his troubles â" not to mention Gingrich himself â" go away with a solid win in Florida. The bad news is that Florida will look infinitely more imposing to him at the start of this coming week than it did at the start of this past one, when polls showed Romney opening a lead of more than 20 points. But the poll numbers in Florida, as elsewhere, have been absurdly volatile; it was just over a month ago that Gingrich enjoyed a 27-point lead over Romney. So the race in the Sunshine State should tighten dramatically in the days ahead, if it hasnât already.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Whatâs more, Florida proved itself in the 2010 elections to be particularly hospitable to the Tea Party strain of Republicanism that powered Gingrichâs South Carolina surge â" and that has long been suspicious of Romney. In that yearâs GOP gubernatorial primary, Rick Scott, a Tea Party-aligned outsider with a troubled past whose nomination state and national party leaders feared and strongly discouraged, defeated Bill McCollum, a well-credentialed political veteran with broad support from the party establishment. On the surface, at least, the dynamics of a Romney-Gingrich battle are rather similar.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Disrupting Romneyâs easy glide to the nomination and forcing him into such a precarious position gives Gingrich at least a measure of the revenge heâs coveted. The question, though, is whether he can parlay his South Carolina moment into a serious push for the Republican nomination.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Itâs anyoneâs guess what will happen next, but four basic scenarios seem most plausible right now:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. Mitt rights the ship&lt;/strong&gt;: Romney did his best to project confidence and steadiness in his concession speech. What he seems to be counting on is that the GOPâs opinion-shaping class will respond to Gingrichâs win Saturday night the same way it responded to his surge in early December: with panic.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Much has been made of the role the pro-Romney super PAC played in undermining Gingrich last month, and for good reason. But his poll numbers didnât just collapse in Iowa, where the ads aired; they fell everywhere. That points to the role played by many of the rightâs leading voices, commentators, activists and elected officials who remember with horror Gingrichâs run as House speaker in the 1990s and who used their platforms to lash out against him. Their warnings trickled down to rank-and-file Republicans, who began to get cold feet.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That basic pattern, in fact, has played out multiple times during the GOP campaign, with nervous party elites helping to beat back surges from candidates they saw as unfit for the nomination. Romney clearly hopes the elites â" and his super PAC buddies â" will do some dirty work for him again now, arresting Gingrichâs post-South Carolina momentum and leaving Romney in position to score a Florida victory that would silence the doubts about his viability.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2. Newt supplants Mitt&lt;/strong&gt;: On the strength of victories in Iowa&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/oh_by_the_way_mitt_probably_lost_iowa/"&gt;*&lt;/a&gt; and New Hampshire that really werenât that impressive, Romneyâs national support practically doubled and he opened large leads in South Carolina and Florida. In the wake of South Carolina, though, heâll experience the flip side of this, with his numbers tanking, just as Gingrichâs rise. So it canât be ruled out that Gingrich will roll his sudden momentum into Florida, capitalize on the stateâs Tea Party-friendliness, and engineer an equally impressive follow-up triumph â" one that might lift Gingrich into a clear lead nationally and in the next wave of states.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3. The long slog&lt;/strong&gt;: Or maybe the Florida result wonât prove much at all. The scenario is that South Carolina firmly establishes the GOP contest as a two-man race, with the Tea Party wing of the party largely uniting around Gingrich and everyone else siding with Romney. The two men would then trade wins and losses through a drawn-out, virtually momentum-less primary season â" one reminiscent of Hillary/Obama 2008, Hart/Mondale 1984 and Reagan/Ford 1976. The wild card in this would be Ron Paul, whose strategy of targeting small and midsize February caucus states and gobbling up their delegates could make him much more relevant to the race than heâs been.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4. The chaos theory&lt;/strong&gt;: This is the really fun one, and the least likely. But after Saturday night, it at least warrants a mention. The basics: What if Romney suffers such a bad loss in Florida that his campaign melts down completely and elite Republicans lose confidence in his ability to stop Gingrich? If they really are committed to stopping the former speaker, these elites would then be in need of a Plan B, leading to the âwhite knightâ scenario â" a new candidate drafted into the race who could qualify for the late big-state primaries and to prevent Gingrich from racking up the delegates heâd need for a first ballot nomination. There are many reasons to sniff at this possibility, not the least of which is that itâs unclear if the GOP has any candidate on the sidelines whoâd be capable of this. But if Mitt canât get the job done in Florida, expect to hear it mentioned a lot.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;a class="continue-reading chunked" id="12213011" href="http://politics.salon.com/2012/01/22/the_gop%E2%80%99s_south_carolina_nightmare/singleton/" name="12213011"&gt;Continue Reading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;dl class="author"&gt;&lt;dt&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;&lt;img class="writerImage" id="writer-10000126" src="http://media.salon.com/2011/09/thumb_steveKornacki.png" title="Steve Kornacki" alt="Steve Kornacki" width="70" height="65" name="writer-10000126" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/dt&gt; &lt;dd&gt; &lt;p&gt;Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornackiÂ  &lt;a href="http://politics.salon.com/writer/steve_kornacki/"&gt;More Steve Kornacki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/dd&gt; &lt;/dl&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-2641686982555267441?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/2641686982555267441/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-playing-sex-card-backfires.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/2641686982555267441'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/2641686982555267441'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-playing-sex-card-backfires.html' title='Why playing the sex card backfires'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-9047834183853201684</id><published>2012-01-24T16:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T16:00:06.118-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Romney Unleashes Attack With Gingrich Sole Target</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span itemprop="associatedMedia" itemscope="" itemid="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/01/24/us/24debate1/24debate1-articleLarge.jpg" itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject"&gt;&lt;img itemprop="url" itemid="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/01/24/us/24debate1/24debate1-articleLarge.jpg" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/01/24/us/24debate1/24debate1-articleLarge.jpg" width="600" height="330" alt="" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span itemprop="associatedMedia" itemscope="" itemid="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/01/24/us/24debate1/24debate1-articleLarge.jpg" itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject"&gt;Marcus Yam for The New York Times&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="description" class="caption"&gt;&lt;span itemprop="associatedMedia" itemscope="" itemid="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/01/24/us/24debate1/24debate1-articleLarge.jpg" itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject"&gt;Monday's debate between Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul was the 18th in the nominating contest.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;TAMPA, Fla. â" &lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/mitt-romney?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Mitt Romney." class="meta-per"&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/a&gt; leveled a searing attack against &lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/newt-gingrich?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Newt Gingrich." class="meta-per"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt;âs character and raised pointed questions about his ability to lead during a debate here Monday evening, taking urgent steps to slow Mr. Gingrichâs rising momentum in the fight for the Republican presidential nomination.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;For the first time, Mr. Gingrich strode onto the stage as an indisputable equal to Mr. Romney after dislodging him from his confident perch as the front-runner in the race with his commanding victory on Saturday in South Carolina. Mr. Romney dug into his rivalâs tenure as House speaker and the ensuing years, when he advised companies like the mortgage giant Freddie Mac, a period for which Mr. Romney branded him as âan influence peddler in Washington.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âYou are looking for a person who can lead this country at a very critical time,â Mr. Romney said. âThe speaker was given the opportunity to be the leader of our party in 1994, and after four years he resigned in disgrace.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Gingrich painted Mr. Romneyâs attacks as desperate and riddled with inaccuracies. He embraced his confrontational style and defended himself forcefully, but his responses came without the bombast that has delighted crowds throughout the race.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âTheyâre not sending somebody to Washington to manage the decay,â Mr. Gingrich said. âTheyâre sending somebody to Washington to change it, and that requires somebody whoâs prepared to be controversial when necessary.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The new landscape of the Republican campaign came into sharp view, with Mr. Romney and Mr. Gingrich often seeming as though they had traded personalities for the evening. It was clear from the outset that the tables had turned, as Mr. Romney repeatedly tried to provoke Mr. Gingrich, who has built up a reputation as a formidable debater.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âIâm not going to spend the evening trying to chase Governor Romneyâs misinformation,â Mr. Gingrich said, telegraphing his plan to try to take the high road. âI think the American public deserves a discussion about how to beat Barack Obama.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Yet on the eve of President Obamaâs &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/state_of_the_union_message_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about the State of the Union address." class="meta-classifier"&gt;State of the Union address&lt;/a&gt;, the debate was notable for the lack of time devoted to Mr. Obama. It was the first sign of the consequences of a drawn-out Republican nominating contest, with Mr. Obama taking a back seat to terse re-examinations of the candidatesâ records.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;&lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/rick-santorum?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Rick Santorum." class="meta-per"&gt;Rick Santorum&lt;/a&gt;, a former Pennsylvania senator, and Representative &lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/ron-paul?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Ron Paul." class="meta-per"&gt;Ron Paul&lt;/a&gt; of Texas looked on for long stretches of time as Mr. Romney and Mr. Gingrich tangled again and again.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Romney, with his campaign aides at all battle stations, seized on Mr. Gingrichâs release of one of his consulting contracts with the government-sponsored mortgage lender Freddie Mac just hours before the debate. He said the contract showed that Mr. Gingrich was reporting to its chief lobbyist, while âFreddie Mac was costing the people of Florida millions upon millions of dollarsâ because of the housing meltdown.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Gingrich renewed his assertion that he was not working as a registered lobbyist. He pushed back against Mr. Romneyâs charges, declaring, âThereâs a point in this process where it gets unnecessarily personal and nasty, and thatâs sad.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;As the two started arguing about the revenues of their respective businesses, Mr. Romney at one point raised his voice to say, âYou were working for Freddie Mac, you were working for Freddie Mac.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Romney kept pressing Mr. Gingrich on whether his work met the precise definition of lobbying, saying that some members of Congress have claimed that they were, for all practical purposes, lobbied by Mr. Gingrich.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âWhoa, whoa, whoa, whoa,â Mr. Gingrich cut in. âYou just jumped a long way over there, friend,â he said, calling Mr. Romneyâs charges unfair. âThe American people see through it.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The two men even tussled over what would happen to Fidel Castroâs soul upon his death. Asked how he would handle a potential influx of Cubans to American shores, a critical issue to the large Cuban population here in Florida, Mr. Romney said, âYou thank heavens that Fidel Castro has returned to his maker.â&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-9047834183853201684?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/9047834183853201684/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/romney-unleashes-attack-with-gingrich.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/9047834183853201684'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/9047834183853201684'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/romney-unleashes-attack-with-gingrich.html' title='Romney Unleashes Attack With Gingrich Sole Target'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-37745963807277481</id><published>2012-01-24T15:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T15:30:09.831-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Giffords' decision to resign sets up Ariz. race</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;By The Associated Press&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The race to replace Rep. Gabrielle Giffords begins in earnest Monday as the Arizona congresswoman's planned resignation sets up a free-for-all in a competitive district.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The three-term Democrat announced Sunday that she intends to resign from Congress this week to concentrate on recovering. She was grievously injured just over a year ago in an assassination attempt that shook the country.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div id="vine-inlineVideo__10215671" class="inlineVideo photo_align_block" data-contentid="10215671"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, gravely wounded in a shooting a year ago, will resign from Congress. NBC's Kelly O'Donnell reports.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;Giffords could have stayed in office for another year even without seeking re-election, but her decision to resign scrambles the political landscape. Arizona must hold a special primary and general election to find someone to finish out her term, as well as hold the regular primary and general election later this year.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"I don't remember much from that horrible day, but I will never forget the trust you placed in me to be your voice," she said on a video announcing her decision.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Interspersed with photos, the video showed a close-up of Giffords gazing directly at the camera and speaking in a voice that is both firm and halting.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"I have more work to do on my recovery," the congresswoman said at the end of the two-minute-long "A Message from Gabby," appearing to strain with all of her will to communicate. "I have more work to do on my recovery. So to do what's best for Arizona, I will step down this week."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Giffords was shot in the head in January 2011 as she was meeting with constituents outside a supermarket in Tucson, Ariz. Six people died and Giffords and 12 others were injured. Her progress had seemed remarkable, to the point that she was able to walk into the House chamber last August to cast a vote.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The shooting prompted an agonizing national debate about super-charged rhetoric in political campaigns, although the suspect later turned out to be mentally ill.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With Giffords stepping down from her seat in southeast Arizona's 8th Congressional District, Gov. Jan Brewer will call a special primary election likely in April, followed by a general election in June. Before the cycle begins for the regular election, the district will be remapped and renumbered as the 2nd Congressional District.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The regular primary for the new district, which will cover most of the current district's territory, was scheduled for August.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Republican governor acknowledged that the twin election cycles were going to create a mess, especially for potential candidates.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"I think that it's putting a lot of pressure on a lot of people awfully quick, given the fact that they're going to be filling that continuing seat that expires this year, and then we have elections coming (along) new congressional lines," Brewer said. "So there's going to be a lot of confusion in that congressional district."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Giffords would have been heavily favored to win re-election, since she gained immense public support as she recovered from the shooting. She was elected to her third term just two months before she was shot, winning by only about 1 percent over a tea party Republican.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A bevy of Republicans and Democrats have been mentioned as possible candidates for her seat, with several in the GOP already forming official exploratory committees. Republicans who have expressed interest include state Sen. Frank Antenori and sports broadcaster Dave Sitton, among others.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Democratic state lawmakers have been mentioned as possible candidates, as has the name of Giffords' husband, Mark Kelly, although he has publically quashed such speculation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"That's the great 'mentioner' out there, and there are going to be a lot of people mentioned," said Arizona Democratic Party chairman Andrei Cherny. "I think the best rule in situations like this is, 'The folks who are talking don't know, and the folks who know aren't talking.'"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Those who decide to throw their hat into the ring will face yet another quirk in the race: the deadline to turn in nominating signatures for the general election comes before the special general election.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"I'm sure both parties and candidates of all stripes will in the days to come be thinking wide and hard about this district, and I'm sure there's going to be a very vigorous contest," Arizona Democratic Party chairman Andrei Cherny said Sunday. "But today's about thinking about a member of Congress who's going to be irreplaceable no matter who wins that seat."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Late Sunday night, Giffords' office said she will complete the meet-and-greet political event in Tucson Monday that erupted in the shooting last year. Among those attending will be some of the wounded, those who helped them and those who subdued the gunman. She will also visit a family assistance center set up after she was shot, and event billed as her final act as a congresswoman in her district.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Giffords also planned to attend President Barack Obama's State of the Union address on Tuesday in Washington, D.C. And her political career may not be over, said a state Democratic party official who was among a group that met with her Sunday.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jim Woodbrey, a senior vice chairman of the state party, said at the meeting, Giffords strongly implied she would run again for office someday. He said the decision to resign came after much thought.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It was Gabby's individual decision, and she was not in any condition to make that decision five months ago," he said. "So I think waiting so that she could make an informed decision on her own was the right thing to do."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Â© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-37745963807277481?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/37745963807277481/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/giffords-decision-to-resign-sets-up.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/37745963807277481'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/37745963807277481'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/giffords-decision-to-resign-sets-up.html' title='Giffords&apos; decision to resign sets up Ariz. race'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-1789593700952536931</id><published>2012-01-24T15:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T15:00:11.784-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Europe bans Iranian oil imports in push to curtail nuclear program</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;BRUSSELS â" Europe banned the import of Iranian oil Monday and froze Europe-based assets of the Central Bank of Iran, intensifying an international campaign to choke Iranâs economy and force the radical Islamic government to dispel fears that it is working to develop nuclear weapons.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The ban, decided by foreign ministers of the 27-nation European Union, is a dramatic escalation of sanctions against Iran, joining with the United States to &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/increasing-concern-over-oil-prices-iran/2012/01/13/gIQAP98PzP_story.html"&gt;squeeze the oil earnings&lt;/a&gt; and financial transactions that the Tehran government depends on to sustain its citizens and finance its military. The British foreign secretary, William Hague, called the E.U. effort âunprecedentedâ and said it shows the resolve of European governments to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="article-side-rail"&gt;    &lt;div class="article-video border-top border-top padding-top padding-bottom margin-bottom photo-wrapper"&gt; &lt;p class="heading heading3 teaser"&gt;Video&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="relative"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/clandestine-smuggling-goes-on-between-iran-west-138/2012/01/22/gIQAMJitIQ_video.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://img3.wpdigital.net/rf/image_296w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/01/22/Foreign/Videos/01222012-18v/01222012-18v.jpg" alt="Sanctions may have Iran feeling the pinch from Western nations, but in one spot along the Strait of Hormuz, trading goes on much as it always has. Merchants in speedboats move an array of goods between a spot in Oman and Iran. (Jan. 22)"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/clandestine-smuggling-goes-on-between-iran-west-138/2012/01/22/gIQAMJitIQ_video.html"/&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;p class="caption"&gt;Sanctions may have Iran feeling the pinch from Western nations, but in one spot along the Strait of Hormuz, trading goes on much as it always has. Merchants in speedboats move an array of goods between a spot in Oman and Iran. (Jan. 22)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the decision also &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/eu-nations-commit-in-principle-to-iranian-oil-embargo/2012/01/13/gIQADSAivP_story.html"&gt;includes broad loopholes&lt;/a&gt; â" including a six-month delay before it goes into effect â" that soften its immediate practical impact. Existing contracts for Iranian oil can be respected until July 1, an announcement said, and the ban will come under review before May 1 to see if more flexibility is needed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Countries such as Greece and Italy, suffering under crippling debt burdens, are likely to get more time before they have to break their financial ties to Iran, European diplomats said on condition of anonymity. Greece has been buying oil from Iran on credit and earns desperately needed money by refining crude for Balkan neighbors, they said. Italy has arranged for Iranian oil in payment for loans granted by Rome in the past.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Iran has the benefit of its contracts with Asian nations â" in particular, about 60 percent of Iranâs 2.2 million barrels a day of exports have been locked into contracts with China, Japan and South Korea. Turkey accounts for an additional 7 percent. Traditionally, European customers have accounted for less than 20 percent of Iranian exports.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, powerful figures in Iran immediately threatened retaliation, according to news agency reports from Tehran. Their defiance, including calls to close the Strait of Hormuz, underlined the high stakes in the Westâs confrontation with the Islamic government.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ali Fallahian, a member of the countryâs influential Assembly of Experts and a former intelligence minister, told the semiofficial Fars News Agency that Iran should cut off sales to European nations immediately and, if the crisis grows, constrain maritime traffic through the strait. The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow exit from the Persian Gulf through which one-fifth of the worldâs oil exports pass.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Similarly, Mohammed Kossari, deputy chief of the parliamentâs foreign affairs and national security committee, said: âIf any disruption occurs regarding sale of Iranian oil, the Strait of Hormuz will definitely be closed.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Iran had threatened earlier to close the strait, and the Obama administration has said that the United States would see the action as a red line that it would not allow Iran to cross. Underlining the point, a U.S. aircraft carrier group led by the USS Abraham Lincoln sailed through the strait Sunday into the Persian Gulf, accompanied by two European frigates, the British Navyâs Argyll and the French Navyâs La Motte-Picquet.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;European ministers emphasized that their goal in imposing the sanctions was not to provoke more confrontation with Iran, but rather to push the nation to resume talks on &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/irans-quest-to-possess-nuclear-weapons/2011/11/07/gIQAEZaZvM_gallery.html"&gt;Iranâs nuclear program&lt;/a&gt; and to increase openness for inspectors from the United Nationsâ nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âI want the pressure of these sanctions to result in negotiations,â Catherine Ashton, the E.U.âs foreign policy representative, told reporters in Brussels.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear development program is designed to further research and supply electricity. But it has refused full access to its facilities, which include a new underground uranium-enrichment plant.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;U.S. and other officials suspect that Iran is seeking to acquire the means and technology to make nuclear warheads while at the same time improving the missiles that would carry them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âThe recent start of operations of enrichment of uranium to a level of up to 20 percent in the deeply buried underground facility in [Fordow] near Qom further aggravates concerns about the possible military dimensions to Iranâs nuclear program,â the E.U. ministers said in a communique.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Israel, the only Middle East nation that possesses nuclear weapons, has said that a nuclear-armed Iran would threaten its existence, and several Israeli officials have suggested that the Jewish state might at some point seek to destroy or impede the program through a &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/barak-says-israeli-decision-on-iran-strike-remains-far-off/2012/01/18/gIQAcXCv7P_story.html"&gt;bombing campaign&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the E.U.âs embargo was âa step in the right direction,â the Associated Press reported from Jerusalem.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-1789593700952536931?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/1789593700952536931/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/europe-bans-iranian-oil-imports-in-push.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1789593700952536931'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/1789593700952536931'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/europe-bans-iranian-oil-imports-in-push.html' title='Europe bans Iranian oil imports in push to curtail nuclear program'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-4163010746619761986</id><published>2012-01-24T14:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T14:30:03.458-08:00</updated><title type='text'>âSuper PACâ for Gingrich to Get $5 Million Infusion</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;A wealthy backer of &lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/newt-gingrich?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Newt Gingrich." class="meta-per"&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/a&gt; will inject $5 million into a âsuper PACâ supporting his presidential bid, a person with knowledge of the contribution said on Monday, providing a major boost to Mr. Gingrich as he seeks to fend off aggressive attacks from &lt;a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/candidates/mitt-romney?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Mitt Romney." class="meta-per"&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/a&gt;, his main Republican rival.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The supporter, Dr. Miriam Adelson, is the wife of &lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/profile/sheldon-adelson/"&gt;Sheldon Adelson&lt;/a&gt;, a longtime Gingrich friend and patron who contributed $5 million to the super PAC, &lt;a href="http://www.winningourfuture.com/"&gt;Winning Our Future&lt;/a&gt;, this month. Dr. Adelsonâs check will bring the coupleâs total contributions to Winning Our Future to $10 million, a figure that could substantially neutralize the millions of dollars already being spent in Florida by Mr. Romney and &lt;a href="http://restoreourfuture.com/"&gt;Restore Our Future&lt;/a&gt;, a super PAC backing him.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Mr. Adelsonâs initial check financed a high-powered barrage of negative ads against Mr. Romney in South Carolina, helping Mr. Gingrich to a shocking victory in Saturdayâs Republican primary there. But those attacks, which focused on Mr. Romneyâs wealth and career in the &lt;a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/p/private_equity/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" title="More articles about private equity." class="meta-classifier"&gt;private equity&lt;/a&gt; business, also drew condemnation from many conservatives, who said that Mr. Gingrichâs allies were undercutting free-market capitalism and amplifying class-warfare arguments being made by Democrats and Occupy Wall Street demonstrators.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;In making the coupleâs second $5 million contribution, Dr. Adelson expressed a wish to officials at Winning Our Future that the money be used âto continue the pro-Newt message,â the person said, rather than attacks on Mr. Romney.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The Adelsonsâ contributions on Mr. Gingrichâs behalf illustrate how rapidly the era of unlimited political money is reshaping the rules of presidential politics and empowering individual donors to a degree unseen since before the Watergate era.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The wealth of a single couple has now leveled the playing field in two critical primary states for Mr. Gingrich, a candidate who ended September more than a million dollars in debt, finished out of the running in Iowa and New Hampshire, and, unlike Mr. Romney, has yet to attract the broad network of hard-money donors and bundlers that traditionally propel presidential campaigns.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;The contribution underscored how the traditional advantages built by Mr. Romneyâs campaign, including a potent get-out-the-vote operation in Florida and campaign contributions raised in chunks of no more than $2,500, are being challenged by new forces, including the high-profile debates that have defined the campaign and the emergence of new campaign finance rules in the wake of the Supreme Courtâs landmark &lt;a title="About the ruling." href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-205.ZS.html"&gt;Citizens United&lt;/a&gt; ruling.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Rick Tyler, a longtime Gingrich aide who is now a senior adviser for Winning Our Future, declined to comment on the contribution. But the prospects of the group getting another cash infusion from the Adelsons appeared to be in question as recently as Sunday night, when Mr. Tyler said he would like to spend $10 million in Florida to aid Mr. Gingrich but did not yet have the resources to do so.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Indeed, early Monday, as Mr. Romney and his allies signaled the start of an aggressive anti-Gingrich effort in Florida, Winning Our Future placed only a small, short-term advertising buy in the state: $392,000, relatively little in a state with large numbers of expensive media markets.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;News of the contribution was reported in a Twitter message on Monday evening by Jon Ralston, a columnist for The Las Vegas Sun.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Dr. Adelsonâs contribution came after days of public and private pressure from allies of Mr. Romney, who hoped to stem the flow of money to Mr. Gingrich and viewed Mr. Adelsonâs continued help as potentially devastating to Mr. Romneyâs chances.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;One of Mr. Romneyâs chief backers, former New Hampshire governor John H. Sununu, referred to Mr. Adelson in a recent television interview as ânot so brightâ and suggested he would face retribution from investors in his casino empire.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;âDoes he think people donât remember when you attack them and pay for the attacks in the primary? Especially when one of the parties receiving that attack is the same investment community that he likes to go to finance his expansions?â Mr. Sununu said.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Just how dependent Winning Our Future is on the Adelsonsâ money is impossible to say. Federal Election Commission rules do not require Winning Our Future and other candidate-specific super PACs to publicly report donors until Jan. 31â" the same day as the Republican primary in Florida.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Through Monday, the group had reported spending $3.9 million in the early primary states, three-quarters of it on advertisements attacking Mr. Romney.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;Restore Our Future, the super PAC supporting Mr. Romney and run by a trio of his former aides, has spent far more: About $11.1 million through Monday, including millions of dollars spent against Mr. Gingrich in Iowa on ads that are widely credited with crippling his campaign there.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p itemprop="articleBody"&gt;It is unclear whether the group has yet attracted contributions at the Adelsonsâ level; through the end of June, when it filed a midyear disclosure report with the election commission, the groupâs largest donors had given checks of $1 million.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="authorIdentification"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jeremy W. Peters contributed reporting.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-4163010746619761986?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/4163010746619761986/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/asuper-paca-for-gingrich-to-get-5.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4163010746619761986'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/4163010746619761986'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/asuper-paca-for-gingrich-to-get-5.html' title='âSuper PACâ for Gingrich to Get $5 Million Infusion'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-5850096319254781043</id><published>2012-01-24T14:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T14:00:04.040-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama to 'Hang Out' Online, Answer SOTU Questions</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="innerbody"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jan 23, 2012 9:47am&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" title="Obama to &amp;#x2018;Hang Out&amp;#x2019; Online, Answer SOTU Questions" description="Following Tuesday&amp;#x2019;s State of the Union address, President Obama will be taking his message online, participating in a virtual video &amp;#x201C;hang out&amp;#x201D; to answer questions about his speech. In an ongoing White House effort to maximize social media tools, the president will participate in a..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" title="Obama to &amp;#x2018;Hang Out&amp;#x2019; Online, Answer SOTU Questions" description="Following Tuesday&amp;#x2019;s State of the Union address, President Obama will be taking his message online, participating in a virtual video &amp;#x201C;hang out&amp;#x201D; to answer questions about his speech. In an ongoing White House effort to maximize social media tools, the president will participate in a..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" title="Obama to &amp;#x2018;Hang Out&amp;#x2019; Online, Answer SOTU Questions" description="Following Tuesday&amp;#x2019;s State of the Union address, President Obama will be taking his message online, participating in a virtual video &amp;#x201C;hang out&amp;#x201D; to answer questions about his speech. In an ongoing White House effort to maximize social media tools, the president will participate in a..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="font-toggle"&gt; &lt;div class="wp-caption alignnone c3"&gt;&lt;img title="PHOTO:&amp;#xA0;President Barack Obama walks into the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House in Washington on July 29, 2011." src="http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/ap_barack_obama_jef_110729_wblog.jpg" alt="ap barack obama jef 110729 wblog Obama to Hang Out Online, Answer SOTU Questions" width="478" height="269"/&gt;&lt;p class="wp-caption-text"&gt;Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP Photo&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;Following Tuesdayâs State of the Union address, President Obama will be taking his message online, participating in a virtual video âhang outâ to answer questions about his speech.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In an ongoing White House effort to maximize social media tools, the president will participate in a Google+ Hangout next Monday, January 30. The live video chat will mark the first all-virtual interview from the West Wing and cap a week of social media engagement that the White House is planning around the State of the Union.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âThe president is committed to creating a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Thatâs why President Obama and more than twenty-five members of his administration will be responding to your questions about the speech all week and talking about the issues that matter most to you,â according to the White House.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will be answering video questions submitted through YouTube and will invite some of the questioners to âhang outâ and participate in the live conversation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The president will also be taking his message on the road with a three-day tour through five swing states later this week.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" title="Obama to &amp;#x2018;Hang Out&amp;#x2019; Online, Answer SOTU Questions" description="Following Tuesday&amp;#x2019;s State of the Union address, President Obama will be taking his message online, participating in a virtual video &amp;#x201C;hang out&amp;#x201D; to answer questions about his speech. In an ongoing White House effort to maximize social media tools, the president will participate in a..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" title="Obama to &amp;#x2018;Hang Out&amp;#x2019; Online, Answer SOTU Questions" description="Following Tuesday&amp;#x2019;s State of the Union address, President Obama will be taking his message online, participating in a virtual video &amp;#x201C;hang out&amp;#x201D; to answer questions about his speech. In an ongoing White House effort to maximize social media tools, the president will participate in a..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" title="Obama to &amp;#x2018;Hang Out&amp;#x2019; Online, Answer SOTU Questions" description="Following Tuesday&amp;#x2019;s State of the Union address, President Obama will be taking his message online, participating in a virtual video &amp;#x201C;hang out&amp;#x201D; to answer questions about his speech. In an ongoing White House effort to maximize social media tools, the president will participate in a..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu-questions/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-5850096319254781043?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/5850096319254781043/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5850096319254781043'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/5850096319254781043'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-to-hang-out-online-answer-sotu.html' title='Obama to &apos;Hang Out&apos; Online, Answer SOTU Questions'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-3568611418389728243</id><published>2012-01-24T13:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T13:30:05.248-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Presidential Planner - The State of the Union</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="innerbody"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jan 24, 2012 10:37am&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" title="The Presidential Planner &amp;#x2013; The State of the Union" description="Tonight President Obama will stand before a divided Congress to deliver his third State of the Union and outline his vision for an &amp;#x201C;America Built To Last.&amp;#x201D; Echoing the themes of a speech he gave in Kansas last month, the president will detail his vision..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" title="The Presidential Planner &amp;#x2013; The State of the Union" description="Tonight President Obama will stand before a divided Congress to deliver his third State of the Union and outline his vision for an &amp;#x201C;America Built To Last.&amp;#x201D; Echoing the themes of a speech he gave in Kansas last month, the president will detail his vision..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" title="The Presidential Planner &amp;#x2013; The State of the Union" description="Tonight President Obama will stand before a divided Congress to deliver his third State of the Union and outline his vision for an &amp;#x201C;America Built To Last.&amp;#x201D; Echoing the themes of a speech he gave in Kansas last month, the president will detail his vision..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="font-toggle"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Tonight President Obama will stand before a divided Congress to deliver his third State of the Union and outline his vision for an âAmerica Built To Last.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Echoing the themes of a speech he gave in Kansas last month, the president will detail his vision for economic fairness and a return to American values.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âThis is not just another political debate. This is the defining issue of our time. This is a make-or-break moment for the middle class, and for all those who are fighting to get into the middle class,â the president said in Osawatomie, Kan.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama will make a renewed pitch for tax fairness and the âBuffet Ruleâ as he calls for wealthier Americans to pay their fair share. Billionaire Warren Buffett has argued that he shouldnât pay a higher tax rate than his secretary and the president agrees. Buffettâs secretary, Debbie Bosanek, will be seated in the first ladyâs box to listen to this eveningâs address.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In a preview of the address, the president drew a clear line in the sand. âWe can go in two directions: One is towards less opportunity and less fairness, or we can fight for where I think we need to go: building an economy that works for everyone, not just a wealthy few.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Overall the president will lay out a roadmap for the economy based on four central pillars: manufacturing, energy, skills for workers, and American values.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Tomorrow Obama will take his message on the road, visiting five critical swing states in just three days.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;h6 class="tagged"&gt;SHOWS: &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/topics/show/world-news/" rel="tag"&gt;World News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h6&gt; &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" title="The Presidential Planner &amp;#x2013; The State of the Union" description="Tonight President Obama will stand before a divided Congress to deliver his third State of the Union and outline his vision for an &amp;#x201C;America Built To Last.&amp;#x201D; Echoing the themes of a speech he gave in Kansas last month, the president will detail his vision..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" title="The Presidential Planner &amp;#x2013; The State of the Union" description="Tonight President Obama will stand before a divided Congress to deliver his third State of the Union and outline his vision for an &amp;#x201C;America Built To Last.&amp;#x201D; Echoing the themes of a speech he gave in Kansas last month, the president will detail his vision..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" title="The Presidential Planner &amp;#x2013; The State of the Union" description="Tonight President Obama will stand before a divided Congress to deliver his third State of the Union and outline his vision for an &amp;#x201C;America Built To Last.&amp;#x201D; Echoing the themes of a speech he gave in Kansas last month, the president will detail his vision..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/the-presidential-planner-the-state-of-the-union/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-3568611418389728243?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/3568611418389728243/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/presidential-planner-state-of-union.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3568611418389728243'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/3568611418389728243'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/presidential-planner-state-of-union.html' title='The Presidential Planner - The State of the Union'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-36776680351170602</id><published>2012-01-24T13:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T13:00:06.475-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Winners and losers in Mondayâs debate</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="el-article-div"&gt;&lt;span id="startOfPage"/&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mondayâs debate marked the first such meeting in months where the GOP nomination wasnât seen as Mitt Romneyâs to lose.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A Republican presidential debate in Tampa, Fla. on Monday marked the first such meeting of the rivals in months where the GOP nomination wasnât seen as Mitt Romneyâs to lose. Coming off his wide-margin win in South Carolinaâs primary on Saturday, Newt Gingrich &lt;a mce_href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/205991-romney-and-gingrich-exchange-fire-early-in-gop-debate" href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/205991-romney-and-gingrich-exchange-fire-early-in-gop-debate"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;assailed Romney&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, while Ron Paul and Rick Santorum struggled to get a word in edgewise.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hereâs a look at some of the winners and losers from Mondayâs debate:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Winners&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The former Massachusetts governor launched into a confrontational and unrelenting attack on Gingrich within minutes of the start of the debate, putting him on the offensive early and leaving no question in the minds of his opponents that he came ready to play.&lt;/p&gt;  Hardly a slap landed on Romney in almost two hours, despite pointed questions about his refusal thus far to release his tax returns; Romney reversed an earlier decision to hold off and is scheduled to release them Tuesday morning. &lt;p&gt;He also delivered a one-two punch to Gingrich, now his most threatening rival in the GOP contest, accusing him of lobbying for Freddie Mac, the government-backed mortgage lender that most conservatives revile, and claiming he âresigned in disgraceâ from his position as Speaker of the House in the late 1990s.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney also offered his most compelling and conclusive response yet to questions about his job-creation record as CEO of private-equity firm Bain Capital, pivoting critiques of his work to a display of what he had accomplished for American workers.&lt;/p&gt;  âI will not apologize for having been successful,â Romney said. âI did not inherit what my wife and I have â" nor did she. I built the old fashioned way, by earning it.â &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Newt Gingrich&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There were abundant opportunities for Gingrich to go off script and let loose on Romney, who relentlessly attacked Gingrich from almost every direction. But Gingrich kept his cool, opting to respond to what he called Romneyâs untruths in a website he said his campaign would establish by Tuesday morning, rather than waste his time during the debate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Gingrich may not have helped himself tremendously, failing to have any stand-out moments or to generate the standing ovations that characterized the previous two debates. But he headed into Mondayâs debate with the momentum of a decisive win in South Carolina and new polls showing he has closed the gap on Romney both in Florida and nationally.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;By hovering mostly above the fray, Gingrich affirmed his status as an unlikely but unambiguously top-tier candidate, and did himself no harm in the process.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The GOP's neoconservative wing&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Candidates didnât mince their words outlining a decidedly interventionist approach to dealing with foreign countries who donât cotton to American-style democracy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney railed against the shrinking size of the Navy, while Santorum declared his commitment to using U.S. resources to ensure that âour hemisphere and those who are close to us are folks that we can and should deal with.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Santorum later deemed Iranâs theocratic government to be the equivalent of al Qaeda, and Gingrich called for the United States to use covert operations (among other methods) to help overthrow the government of Cuba.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Rep. Ron Paul (Texas), meanwhile, joked about how much he still had to teach Gingrich about foreign policy, reiterating his longstanding belief in a non-interventionist approach to foreign policy and calling for increased trade relations with nations of all flavors.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âItâs not 1962 anymore and we donât have to use force and intimidation,â Paul said. âI just donât think thatâs going to work anymore.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Losers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ron Paul and Rick Santorum&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thereâs a reason both Paul and Santorum have remained in the race even after Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Jon Huntsman all dropped out: Both have made impressive gains during the past few months and translated those gains into relative success at the polls. The final tally out of Iowa showed that Santorum won the first-in-the-nation caucuses â" albeit narrowly â" and Paul has placed in the top two or three in all of the first three contests.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But both were relegated to afterthoughts in Mondayâs debate, barely speaking in the first 40 minutes and struggling to prove their continued relevance in the race.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fidel Castro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Throwing red meat to GOP voters in Florida, where conservative Cuban immigrants make up a substantial portion of the primary electorate, the candidates left little unsaid about their distaste for Fidel Castro, who has officially stepped down as Cubaâs leader but still looms large over the nation.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âYou thank heaven that Fidel Castro has returned to his maker and will be sent to another land,â Romney said when asked how he would respond to a phone call informing him of the dictatorâs death.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"I don't think Fidel's going to meet his maker. I think he's going to a different place,â said Gingrich, taking the assault a step further.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The unemployed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unlike almost all of the previous 17 presidential debates this season, where talk of unemployment and plans to create jobs dominated the discussion, there was scarcely a mention of jobs in Mondayâs debate, despite an unemployment rate of about 10 percent in Florida.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Instead, the conversation revisited topics of questionable relevance to contemporary voters, including the merits of life-sustaining medical treatments for Terry Schiavo a decade ago and the impetus for U.S. intervention in World War II.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In fact, the closest the debate came to a focused conversation on creating jobs came as Romney was defending himself against ongoing critiques that his work in the private sector included laying off workers to make companies more profitable.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âThese are not just financial jobs,â Romney said as he recalled companies such as Staples that his private equity firm helped launch. âIâm proud of the fact we helped people around the country.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;hr/&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-36776680351170602?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/36776680351170602/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/winners-and-losers-in-mondayas-debate.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/36776680351170602'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/36776680351170602'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/winners-and-losers-in-mondayas-debate.html' title='Winners and losers in Mondayâs debate'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-2555899596911420124</id><published>2012-01-24T12:30:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T12:30:03.980-08:00</updated><title type='text'>RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="innerbody"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jan 24, 2012 11:48am&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" title="RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama" description="President Obama&amp;#x2019;s unpopularity in the polls seems to be seeping beyond his politics and affecting his social calendar. When Obama welcomed the NHL&amp;#x2019;s Boston Bruins to the White House Monday, goalie Tim Thomas, one of the hockey team&amp;#x2019;s star players, snubbed the presidential invite, staying..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" title="RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama" description="President Obama&amp;#x2019;s unpopularity in the polls seems to be seeping beyond his politics and affecting his social calendar. When Obama welcomed the NHL&amp;#x2019;s Boston Bruins to the White House Monday, goalie Tim Thomas, one of the hockey team&amp;#x2019;s star players, snubbed the presidential invite, staying..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" title="RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama" description="President Obama&amp;#x2019;s unpopularity in the polls seems to be seeping beyond his politics and affecting his social calendar. When Obama welcomed the NHL&amp;#x2019;s Boston Bruins to the White House Monday, goalie Tim Thomas, one of the hockey team&amp;#x2019;s star players, snubbed the presidential invite, staying..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &lt;div class="font-toggle"&gt; &lt;div class="wp-caption alignnone c3"&gt;&lt;img title="Boston Bruins Visit the White House" src="http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/gty_barack_obama_white_house_boston_bruins_ll_120124_wblog.jpg" alt="gty barack obama white house boston bruins ll 120124 wblog RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama" width="478" height="269"/&gt;&lt;p class="wp-caption-text"&gt;Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;President Obamaâs unpopularity in the polls seems to be seeping beyond his politics and affecting his social calendar.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When Obama &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/obama-honors-stanley-cup-champion-boston-bruins-15422405" target="_blank"&gt;welcomed the NHLâs Boston Bruins&lt;/a&gt; to the White House Monday, goalie Tim Thomas, one of the hockey teamâs star players, snubbed the presidential invite, staying home in protest of the state of Washington politics.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âI believe the federal government has grown out of control, threatening the rights, liberties, and property of the people,â Thomas said in a statement, adding that his decision not to attend the ceremony âwas not about politics or party, as in my opinion both parties are responsible for the situation we are in as a country.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thomasâ snub is not the first cold shoulder Obama has gotten from a sports star.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In September, when Obama invited 12 NASCAR drivers to the White House, two declined the invite. Although &lt;a title="NASCAR Drivers Deny Obama Snub" href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/nascar-drivers-deny-obama-snub/"&gt;Greg Biffle and Tony Stewart&lt;/a&gt; cited scheduling conflicts, their high-profile hooky did not go unnoticed or un-criticized by their fellow drivers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;âRegardless of political views, when (president of the United States) sends an invite and wants to honor you at the White House, you accept,â driver Jimmie Johnson tweeted, adding a hash tag with the word ârespect.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Later that month former &lt;a title="Obama Honors 'the Greatest Team in NFL History' (a.k.a. Da Bears)" href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/obama-honors-the-greatest-team-in-nfl-history-a-k-a-da-bears/"&gt;Chicago Bears lineman Dan Hampton&lt;/a&gt; also chose not to attend an Oval Office celebration of the Bearsâ 1985 Super Bowl win, saying heâs ânot a fan of the guy in the White House.â Obama honored the teamâs 25-year-old win last September because the Bearsâ initial visit with Ronald Reagan in 1986 was canceled after of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Former President George H.W. Bush was also on the receiving end of a superstar snub. Basketball legend Michael Jordon was a no-show in 1991 when Bush invited the NBA Champion Chicago Bulls to celebrate their win at the White House.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Itâs not just sports stars who have a habit of turning down invites from the commander-in-chief. Politicians have a long track record of opting out of major presidential events, such as the State of the Union address.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Colorado Republican &lt;a title="Rep. Lamborn: Working With Obama Is like 'Touching a Tar Baby'" href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/08/rep-lamborn-working-with-obama-is-like-touching-a-tar-baby/"&gt;Rep. Doug Lamborn&lt;/a&gt; has already announced he will not attend Obamaâs third State of the Union speech tonight because he âdoes not support the policies of Barack Obama.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;At last yearâs State of the Union, three front-row seats where empty after Supreme Court justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas refused to attend.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Their absence was likely inspired by an uncomfortable exchange during Obamaâs 2010 address, when the president chided the courtâs &lt;a title="War of Words Continues Between White House, Supreme Court" href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2010/03/war-of-words-continues-between-white-house-supreme-court/"&gt;Citizens United decision&lt;/a&gt;, which allowed corporations to have a greater impact in election financing. During the speech Justice Alito was seen mouthing the words ânot true.â&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;  &lt;h6 class="tagged"&gt;SHOWS: &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/topics/show/world-news/" rel="tag"&gt;World News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h6&gt; &lt;div class="social-buttons addthis_default_style"&gt;&lt;span class="addthis_dynamic_wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" layout="button_count"/&gt;  &lt;a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" title="RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama" description="President Obama&amp;#x2019;s unpopularity in the polls seems to be seeping beyond his politics and affecting his social calendar. When Obama welcomed the NHL&amp;#x2019;s Boston Bruins to the White House Monday, goalie Tim Thomas, one of the hockey team&amp;#x2019;s star players, snubbed the presidential invite, staying..." size="medium"/&gt;Â &lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_email share-email" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" title="RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama" description="President Obama&amp;#x2019;s unpopularity in the polls seems to be seeping beyond his politics and affecting his social calendar. When Obama welcomed the NHL&amp;#x2019;s Boston Bruins to the White House Monday, goalie Tim Thomas, one of the hockey team&amp;#x2019;s star players, snubbed the presidential invite, staying..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="addthis_button_compact share-share c2" url="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" title="RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama" description="President Obama&amp;#x2019;s unpopularity in the polls seems to be seeping beyond his politics and affecting his social calendar. When Obama welcomed the NHL&amp;#x2019;s Boston Bruins to the White House Monday, goalie Tim Thomas, one of the hockey team&amp;#x2019;s star players, snubbed the presidential invite, staying..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/blogs/politics/wp-content/themes/abc/img/transparent.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool smaller-text" id="small" title="Reduce Font Size"&gt;Smaller Font&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool restore-text" id="original" title="Original Font Size"&gt;Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool larger-text" id="large" title="Increase Font Size"&gt;Larger Text&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="divider"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas-colorado-rep-snub-president-obama/" class="text-tool print-text" id="print" title="Print Page"&gt;Print&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" /&gt; &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2597727123430056533-2555899596911420124?l=thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/feeds/2555899596911420124/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/2555899596911420124'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2597727123430056533/posts/default/2555899596911420124'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thepoliticalsnitch.blogspot.com/2012/01/rsvpeeved-bruins-goalie-tim-thomas.html' title='RSVPeeved: Bruins Goalie Tim Thomas, Colorado Rep. Snub President Obama'/><author><name>Cancer85</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='24' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jvWSIwx_XBg/S9YNPyBNpXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/Qrnu2DlhrJ0/S220/6a00c225258f88604a00f48cee9f620003-500pi.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2597727123430056533.post-2285295370431626908</id><published>2012-01-24T12:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T12:00:04.083-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Romney Earned $42M in Last 2 Years</title><content type='html'>&lt;div id="storyText"&gt;     &lt;p&gt;Mitt Romney earned more than $42 million over the past two years, and paid $6.2 million in taxes at an effective rate of less than 14 percent, according to documents provided by the Romney campaign today.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The tax rate is less than what most middle-income Americans were required to pay, mainly because a majority of Romney's earnings were derived from investments rather than a yearly fixed income.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The former Massachusetts governor released the tax record amid increasing scrutiny into his financial records and repeated calls by his rivals, and even some supporters, to release his tax information.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In 2010, Romney made $21.7 million, on which he gave nearly $3 million in taxes. In 2011, the former governor earned a similar amount, and paid $3.2 million in taxes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"It's an extensive disclosure and we feel that it adequately satisfies the public," Romney's campaign counsel, Ben Ginsburg, said in a conference call this morning.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney's tax rate appears to be considerably low for someone with his amount of wealth, but Ginsburg pointed out that capital investments are taxed at the corporate level at about 35 percent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The returns also showed that Romney and his wife, Ann, gave away $3 million in charitable donations in 2010, including $1.5 million to the Mormon church. In the past two years, Romney and his wife, Ann, gave just a little bit less, about 10 percent, to the Church of Latter Day Saints.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The two put their assets in a blind trust when he became governor of Massachusetts in 2003.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Answering questions about his investments in the Cayman Islands and in mutual funds that includes assets from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Romney's trustee who handles his family's funds, Brad Matt of Ropes and Gray, said that the decision to make the investment was made by him, not Romney and that the two are not allowed to confer with each other on these investments.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Romney's portfolio included an account in a Swiss bank, but it was disposed of in 2010, the year that Romney announced his candidacy. Malt said the move may or may not have been aligned with Romney's political views, but Malt closed the account because "this account was not serving any purpose."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_image_feature"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="leftRail.showStoryPhoto('rel_image_feature');" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Image]&amp;amp;lid=view[Image]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ap_mitt_romney_jef_110627_wg.jpg" width="200" height="100" class="c3" border="0" alt="PHOTO:Â Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, accompanied by Thomas Desmet, president of Mosaic Technology, speaks during a roundtable discussion with business leaders in Salem, N.H. on June 27, 2011." title=""/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jim Cole/AP Photo&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="photo_caption"&gt;Republican presidential candidate Mitt... &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="leftRail.showStoryPhoto('rel_image_feature');" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Image]&amp;amp;lid=view[Image]"&gt;View Full Size&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ap_mitt_romney_jef_110627_wg.jpg" width="640" height="320" class="c1" border="0" alt="PHOTO:Â Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, accompanied by Thomas Desmet, president of Mosaic Technology, speaks during a roundtable discussion with business leaders in Salem, N.H. on June 27, 2011." title=""/&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_1"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_1','15427307',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_1]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/GMA/abc_gma_steph_120124_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;Obama Strategist on 2012: 'A Very Close Election' &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_1','15427307',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_1');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_2"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_2','15419380',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_2]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/GMA/abc_gma_gingint_120123_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;Newt Gingrich Says He Can 'Shake Up Washington' &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_2','15419380',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close" onclick="closeLeftRailVideo('rel_2');"/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_container g_4" id="rel_3"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_content"&gt; &lt;div class="rel_thumb"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_3','14044580',true);" name="lpos=widget[Left_Rail_Video_3]&amp;amp;lid=view[Video]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/US/abc_NewsFlash_new_111004_wl.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="112"/&gt;&lt;span class="image_icon"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_headline"&gt;Giffords Steps Down From Congress; Starbucks Adds Booze &lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="open" onclick="playStoryVideo('rel_3','14044580',true);"&gt;Watch Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div class="rel_inactive"&gt;&lt;img src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" width="640" height="360" border="0" class="c4"/&gt;&lt;span class="active_image_closer"&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0);" class="clo
